✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 19 Oct 2012

The Fishermen Cooperative Society, Gunjepalli v. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Matsya Bhavan, Shanthi Nagar, Vijay

Writ Petition No. 32962 of 2012C V NAGARJUNA REDDY

Case at a glance

Order date
19 Oct 2012
Bench
C V NAGARJUNA REDDY

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.M.Vidyavathi Counsel for the respondents: --- The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: respondents in not according permission

…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Register/Organise Fishermen Cooperative Society, Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District as bad, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the APCS Act, 1964 and also offends Arts.14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to register the Fishermen Cooperative Society, Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District under APCS Act, 1964 in the interest of justice.

At the hearing, Smt.M.Vidyavathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to her client to file a fresh writ petition in proper name. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41968 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous. 19th October, 2012 VGB C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

APCS Act, 1964; Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 21.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Oct 2012. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA REDDY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 32962 of 2012). ← Search more judgments