M. Venkanna v. Pradesh, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 226
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.JAGANNADHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO : 922 of 2007
ORDER:
(Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned G.P that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No:21707/2006 and batch, dated 19.3.2008. Recording the above submission, this writ petition dismissed in terms of the order of this Court in W.P.No:21707/2006 and batch, dated 19.3.2008. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ___________________ Justice S.Ashok Kumar Dated:27.03.2008 Gurc/nn THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :922 of 2007 (Division Bench Order delivered by Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) , 27/03/2008
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 27 Mar 2008. The bench was T MEENA KUMARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.