Pittala Naresh v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ or direction particularly one in the nature of ...RESPONDENTS 7 WRIT OF MANDANIUS declaring the action of the Respondents No.1 to 7 in not considering the rr; presentatio n s of the petitioner plat;e:d before them on dt.0911212024 com6rl3ining about the irregularities happening in Rudrangi Gram Panchayat Office through Respondent Nos.8 & I who are granting House Construction Permissions-in Government Lands for monetary gains by giving House Numbers w thout mentioning the Survey Numberi which were already alloted to Gram Panchayat, Rudrangi village for the sal<e of public Use and Construction of Government offices and other in Sy.No.481ll2 extent Ac 0-38 gts, Sy.No.428l3 extent Ac.0-25 gts and Sy.No.428l4 extent l,c:.0-9 gts, total extent Ac.1-32 gts Situaterl at Rudrangi Village and Mandal, ftajzrna Sircilla District as illegal, arbitrary and un co nstitutio na I and consequently dire:1. the Respondents to. i) cancelling the House Building Permission Order of Gadd;rrn Satya W/o Shankar vide Proceedings No.557/BP/2023, dt.0410812123, $anlec by Respondent No.9 forthwith. ii) directir:ns to respondents no.5 and 6 to not to grant any House Building Permissior s in Government Lands in Sy.No.482'2: extent Ac-0-38 gts, Sy.No.428l3 extent Ac.0-25 gts and Sy.No.428l4 extent Lc.0-9 gts, total extent Ac.1-32 gts Situaterl in Rudrangi Village and Mandal, Raja.rna Sircilla District. iii) directions to the respondent no.5 and 6 to demolish the structures, Buildings and sheds raised Government lands in Sy.No.482l2 extent Ab.0-38 gts, Sy.No.428l3 extent Ac.0-25 gts and Sy.No.42814 extent Ac.0-9 gts, total extent Ac.1-32 gts Situated in Rudranr;i Village and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District forthwith. iv) Directions to the rel;pondent no.7 to not to register any do':t-rment pertains to the Government Lands n Sy.No.48212 extent Ac.O-38 gts, Sy.Nlo.42Bl3 extent Ac-0- 25 gts and Sy.No.12814 extent Ac.0-9 gts, total extent Ac 1-32 gts Situated in Rudrangl Village & l/andal, Rajanna Sircilla District forthwitl lA NO: '1 OF 2025 Petition unde' Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Col rt may be pleased to direct the Responrlents cancelling the House Building Permission Order of Gaddam Satya W/o Shankar vide Proceedings No.557/BP/r'CtZ3, dt.O4lOBl2023. lA NO:2 OF 2025 Petitron unde- Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Col rl may be pleased to Direct the respond:nt no.7 to not to register any docunrent pertains to the Government Lands in Sy.,No.48212 extent Ac 0-38 gts, Sy Nlo.428l3 extent Ac.0- 25 gts and Sy.No.a28l4 extent Ac.0-9 gts, total extent Ac 1-32 gts Situated in Rudrangi Village & l\,4andal, Rajanna Sircilla District, PenCing disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition unde- Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor n may be pleased to direct the responderrt no.5 and 6 to demolish the structure!i, Buildings and sheds raised Government lands in Sy.No.482P extent Ac.0-38 gls, Sy.No-428/3 extent Ac.0-25 gts 81. Sy.No.42Bl4 extent Ac.0-9 gts, total extent Ac.1-32 gts Situated in Rudrangi Village and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no.S and 6 not to grant any House Building Permissions in Government Lands in Sy.No.48212 extent Ac.0-38 gts, Sy.No.42813 extent Ac.0- 25 gts and Sy.No.428l4 extent Ac.0-9 gts, total extent Ac.1-32 gts Situated in Rudrangi Village and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAM PRASAD TEEGALA Counset for the Respondent No.1: SRI G. VEERASWAMY, GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2,4,5 & 7: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, a GP FORREVENUE Counset forthe Respondent No.3 & 6: SRI P. ASHOK KUMAR, ASST. GP FOR PANCHAYATH RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.8 & 9: SRI P. KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BI,E THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SII''OY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA ]TARA WRIT PETITION (PILI No.8 of 2O25 ORDER (Per rlrc tlctrt'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul): Sri llzrrn Prasad Teegala, learned counsbl [or the petitioner; Sri G. Veerasrrvamy, learned Government PieeLi[er for General Administration Department, for respondent No' J ; Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katran r, Iearned Government Pleader 1'cr Revenue, for respondenl Nr s.2, 4, 5 and 7 and Sri P. Ashol: Kumar, learned Assistant Govt'rnment Pleader for Panchayat Ra Department, for respondent, No.6. Learnt'cl Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj

2. Department, to<la5', produced written instructions before us' Relevant para!,raph of the same is extracted as under:- ''ln ttris regard, it is submitted that, on leceipt of thc |c1>rt: sentation cited, the Divisional l)itnchayat ()ffi< cr. Sircilla has been instrucr.ecl vide L.Nr R2/2862 12O24-Pts on 13.72.2024 t() conduct enqLrin' and to submit the report. The Divisional P:nr:hzry:rt Oflicer is engaged in the proposed Gram Panr'hayzrt Elections, 2O24. The enquiry will got comPleted in the presence of the writ petirli'lner and ftrrllrcr irction will taken according to the Rules uithin a lortnight." (Verbatim reproduced) r) J In vrr'w of aforesaid stand of respondrl'lt No'6, learned counsei tbr llre petitioner is satisfred and urgec ma1' be disposed of by directing respondenl that the petition No.6 to act in accordance with his stand taken in the aforesaid extracted 'l 2 paragraph.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for panchayat Raj Department has no objection.

5. Accordingly, this W.P.(PIL) is disposed of by directing respondent No.6 to act in accordance with his stard taken in the written instructions. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits ofthe case. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stald closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8. 9. 10 11 12 IJ The Chief Secretary Dr.B.R.Ambedkar The State of Telangana, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad The Princip'al Secretary, Revenue Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad ihe Principal Secr6tary, The State of Telangana, Panchayath Raj and Rural Developmbnt, Secretaiiat Building, Hyderabad The Cfiief Commissioner Land Admiriistration, Government of Telangana, Nimpally Station Road, Opp. Annapurna Hotel, Abids, Hyderabad tfre bistiict Collector, Rajdnna Sircilla District, Telangana State 1e oiitrict Panchayith Officer, Rajanna Sircilla Dislrict, Telangana State fne Suo Registrar, Vemulawada Sub Registration Office, Vemulawada, Raianna Sirdilla District. Telanqana State On'e CC to SRI RAM PRASAD TEEGALA, Advocate [OPUC] o;; aa io Snt p. ktsHone RAo, sc for GRAM PANCHAYATH toPUC^l i*o ccr toci FoR GENERAL ADIMINISTRATIoN, High court for the state of Telangana. [OUT] Two CCd to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana' touTl lwo CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYATH RAJ, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies BN GJP w HIGH COURT DATED:0710212025 ORDER WP(PIL).No.8 of 2025 1t'l E 5TA r A ) 2 g qPP. 2[76 (;_ }. 2 O5 q,r 1-1q-'- DISPOSING OF THE WR|T PETTTTON (PrL) WITHOUT COSTS .*8d t(*t <G.'