Special Ilranch, Central Zone, Hyderabad, wlro v. High School, Reddy Colony, Champapet

Petition und -'r {i:ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed 'n support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respond=nts to considering the representation dated- 3'1 .0'l .2020 and pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition und,:r Sr:ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sr, pport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responrlentr; to allow the petitioner to attend the training session schedule on 17-2-2020 and pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondents No.1 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.2 : SRI M.V.RAMA RAO, SC FOR, TSLPRB Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.4&5 : GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the forlowing: ORDER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITIONN .29 240F2 o2(J ORDE R: Heard Sri V.Raghunath, learned counsel appearing on behatf of the petitioner, learned Government pteader for Home, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1, Sri M.V.Rama Rao, learned Standing Counset for Telangana State Levet potice Recruitment Board, Hyderabad, appearing on behatf of the respondent No.2, learned Government pleader for Revenue, appearing on beharf of the respondent No.3 and the tearned Government pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.4 and 5.

2.7 e tioner oraver as under: DD ched the u s eki q "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in not the representation dated: considering as being illegal, arbitrary, 3L.OL.2020 against the law and violation of Articles , 2 sN,J W.P.No.2924 of 2020 74 , ?-L of the Constitution of India and pr ncit)les of natural justice, consequently di[ect the respondent to allow the to attend the training session p€titicner schecl,rled on 17.02.2020 and pass such otirer order or orders may deem fit and prope' in the circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No 2 submits that the prayer as sought for by the petitiorer in the present writ petition had already been granted in favour of the petitioner and hence, cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudicatiol, any more and the present writ petitiorl has become inf -uct Jous. Learr ed counsel appearing on behalf of the 4. respondent No.2 brings on record the proceedings vide R.C.No.2BlRect.lAdmn.4l2O20 dated .08.07.2020 01' the Administra:ive Officer, Recruitment, Office of the Chairman, Telangana Stat:e Level Police Recruitment Board, Hyderabad and subm ts :hat the case of the petitioner had been considered in the light of the interim orders of this Court dated 08.C6.2020 passed in the present writ petition and detailed speak ng order dated 08.07.2020 had been passed informing 1:he petitioner that the claim of the petitioner as put forth vide petitioner's representation dated 3l.Ol .2020, I I \ 3 SN,J W.P.No.2924 of 2020 that the petitioner is a local candldate to Hyderabad, incorrect. P USED ERE o RD: 5 The relevant Dortion of th Droceedinos vide R.C.N o.28/ Rect/Ad mn.4/ 2020 dated oa.o7.2020 of the Admini rative Officer, Recruitment, Office of the Level Police Recruitm ent Chairman, Telanoa na Sta Boa rd, Hvderaba com liance the directionsofth is Court dated 08.06.2 o2 O in the oresent wri Detitaon rsextr cted itioner hereu nder: "In the light of the direction of the Hon'ble High Court, the case of the petitioner has been examined. The details are as follows: Sri.Jarapala Ramesh (Reg.No.1183973) had applied for the Post of SCTPC Civil and/or equivalent Posts pursuant to the Notification 1.t cited and participated in the recruitment process. He was provisionally selected to the post of SCT pC (AR) in Hyderabad under ST NCC category, subject to verification of Antecedents, Original Certificates and Medical Fitness. The Petitioner was actually local to Ranga Reddy district as per the study certificates submitted by him and was erroneously mentioned a l i 4 SN,' w.P.No.2924 of 2O2o 'l in the Cl'eck Slip as local to Hyderabad, at tlre time of Certificate Verification prior to his Provisioncrl Selection. The Petitioner in the Online Application also mentioned that he is Local 1:o Hyderaba J and St.Mathews School wherein lte studie d frrm 5th to 10th Class falls in Hyderabad. In the Notification at para 20, page No.rl2 instru ctiorrs were given to the Candidates who studie d in bordering areas of Hyderaba'J, CyberabaC/Rachakonda to obtain a Certificate from the cf,ncorned Head Master of the School as to under which Revenue and District Education Offic'er Jurisciction the school falls i.e. DEO, Hyderabad rr DEO, Ranga Reddy. Tl'e Petitioner in his representation dated 3l-01 -2O2O has contended that his Bonafide is from Hyclerabad and only in the SSC Memo the distrir:t is mentioned as RR District. He also stat(ld that the lichool is functioning in the same premises since its 'nception and the permission was grantt:d by th': authorities of R.R. District. Tf e Petitioner is informed that as per the Lr.Rc No.03/St/2020, dated 31-01-2020 of the Distri:t Educational Officer, Ranga Reddy, addre sserl to the Asst. Commissioner of Police, Special Ilranch, Central Zone, Hyderabad, wlro actually r:nquired into the matter, Sri J. Rame:sh (Admission No.58B) who studied in St.Mathervs High School, Reddy Colony, Champapet, 5 SN,J w.P.No.2924 ()f zozo Saroornagar Mandal. Ranga Reddy Dist from V Class to X Class during the period from 2003 to 2008 falls under the jurisdiction of Ranga Reddy and as per School record the same is found correct. In the light of the above facts, the claim of the Petitioner in his representation dt.31_01_2020, that he is a local Candidate to Hyderabad is not correct. As a local Candidate of Ranga Reddy, the petitioner secured lesser marks than the cut off marks for all posts, as such he is not in the zone of consideration. The marks details are as follows: Marks Least applicable cut off Marks Sl.No Name of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SCT PC (Civil) scT PC (AR) scT PC (SAR CPL) CT rc (TSSP) Constable in SPF Firemen Warder (Mate) secured by he petitioner 78

85.16 78 78 78 78 7A n o u n H 'br Hi 8 2 P 2 me ts retecte ST (Genl) ST(NCC) 98

702.A2 106

100.25

704.25 124 118 u 105

105.38 106

101.2 5 to4.75 724 118 e f th li e t d o2 n q 0 5 SN,J W.P.No.292,1 of 2O2O

6. Taking into cons deration: a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, Hyderabad appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 and, c) The contents of the proceedings vide R.C.No.2ttlRect/Admn.4/2O2O dated O8.07.2O2O ot the Adminis'llrative Officer, Recruitment, Office of the Chairmarr, Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, H'Tderrabad, The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, th,=re shal! be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending ir the: Writ Petition shall also sta nd Closed. I To, /TTRUE COPY// SD/.K. SREE RAMA MURTHY REGISTRAR ?\:"' "'lSEcrl ON OFFICER Department of Home' Secretzrriat' State of 'lelangana State Level Police Recruitment Brlard' Nampally'

1. The Princil al SecretarY' Telangana, lyd€'raDao

2. The Chairm an, HYderabad 3- The Revent e Divisional Officer' Saidabad, HYderabad 4. The District Edu':ation Officer' Nampally'Hyderabad ' 5. The Manoa Edt cation Officer' Malakpet' Hyderabad t U t t!t!!! t!!!! 11 t!!!!t!!! ! -._l /' 6 One CC to SRI V.RAGHUNATH, Advocate. IOPUCI T Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] B. One CC to SRI M.V.RAMA RAO, SC for Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board. [OPUC]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

10.Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 'l 1. Two CD Copies. BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:1710312025 1 \ ORDER WP.No.2924 ol' 2020 CC TODAY glAi E g i'. ar' Y\E !< t( ') ,) .t 'i; 1\ Nq $15 ,,f -I i1- '-1---^_:-.-f.-- '1:'1.1 .t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT C;OI}TS /9 4./3 ./zl/4{ z/