High Court · 2025

Anumula Ramesh @ Ramesh Reddy, S/o Late Anumula Raii Reddy, Aqed about. 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ryo H.No.2-95, Akunuru Vittage, bneryal lVandal, Siddipet District,Telangana State Smt.Anumula Renuka, W/o Anumula Ramesh @ Ramesh Reddy Aged about- !5-.ygars.Oc9 Agriculture, R/o H.No.2-95, Akunuru Village, Ch-eryal Mandal, Siddipet Diskict, Telangana State Smt.Anumula Anusha, Wo Kesireddy Narender Reddy, D/o Anumula Rqmegh @ Ramesh Reddy, Aged about. 26 years, Occ. Hold, R/o H-No.2-95, Akunuru Village, Cheryal [\4anda[, Siddipet District,Telangana State -House ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 a 4 5 6 The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buldings, Hyderabad The District Collector, Siddipet District, Siddipet The Tahsildar, Cheryal [r,4andal, Siddipet District Smt.Ku-sa Vijaya, W/oAnjaiah, D/o Late Anumula Raji Reddy, Aged about. 51 years, Occ.,House Hold, R/o Nilojipally Village, Kodurupaka, Boihpalli Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District Smt.Kusa Aruna, Wo Kondaiah, D/o Late.Anumula Raji Reddy, Aged about. 45 years, Occ. House Hold, R/o H.No.2-54, Salakpur Village, lvladdur tvlandal, Siddipet District Smt.Anumula Suguna, W/o Late Anumula Raji Reddy, Aged about. 70 years, Occ. House Hold, Rl/o H.No.2-96, Akunuru Village, Cheryal Mandal, Siddipet District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in trying to alginate the ...RESPONDENTS properties in way oJ creating third party rights made by the r:eppondent no.4 and 5 even though there was civil case pending and trail was took 'place vide OS.547 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble First Additional Junior civil Judge-cum-First Additional Judicial [\/agistrate of First Class at Siddipet against the petitioner no.1 ,2 and 3 and respondent no.5 and 6. Earlier the above case number was O.S.No.58 of 2021 on the file of Hon'ble Additional Junior Civil Judge, at Jangam subsequently it was transferred to siddipet due to bifurcation of districts as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of the T.S.Rights in lands and pattadar passbooks Act and Violative of petitioners Rights guaranteed under Articles 14,21 and 300-4 and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to not to createlhird party rights on the agriculture lands in Sy. No.1182lAl4 Ac. 0-38 gts, Sy. No.1282ltu6 Ac.0-21 gts' Sy. No.1256/tu4 Ac.0-32 gts, Sy. No.1234lAl4 Ac.0-04 gts, Sy. No. 1184/4"/4 Ac. 1-O7 gts, Sy. No.11B3/A/4 Ac.0-18 gts., Sy.No.11B1lAl4 Ac.0-06 gts, Sy.No.11B0/A/4 Ac.0-05 gts Total to an extent of Ac.4-1 1 gts, situated at Akunuru village of cheryal [\/andal of siddipet District until finalization of the partition suit vide OS.547 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble First Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum- First Additional Judicial [Vagistrate of First Class at Siddipet lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanies stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to not to create third party rights on the agriculture lands in Sy.No.11B2lA/4 Ac.0-38 gts, Sy.No.1282lA16 Ac.O-21 gts, Sy.No.'12561A14 Ac.0-32 gts, Sy.No.1234lAl4 Ac.0-O4 gts, Sy.No.1184lAl4 Ac.1-07 gts, Sy.No.1183/A/4 Ac.0-18 gts, Sy.No.1 181lAl4 Ac 0-06 gts, Sy.No.118OlN4 Ac.0-05 gts Total to an extent of Ac.4-11 gts, situated at Akunuru village of cheryal [Vlandal of Siddipet District until finalization of the partition suit vide OS.547 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble First Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-First Additional Judicial [t/agistrate of First Class at Siddipet pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. RAM PRASAD TEEGALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY ORDER: IVRIT PETITION No.2 849 of2O25 It is stated that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of various extents of agricuitural land situated in different survey numbers of Akunuru Village, Cheryala Mandal, Siddipet District. It is further stated that when disputes arose over the said property, respondent No.4, who is the sister of petitioner No.1, filed a partition suit uide O.S.No.547 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Siddipet. The grievance of the petitioners is that pending adjudication of the said suit, respondent Nos.4 to 6 are making efforts to dispose of the subject property in favour of third parties.

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed at.the admission stage. In view of Lhe nature of relief sought for in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the unofhcial respondents is dispensed with. I L i I 2 CVBR, J wp 2,349 2025 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos l to 3 has vehemently contended that respondel-rt No'3 is competent to entertain any registration andinthcabsenceofanyoftheinjunctiongrantedbythe competent civil Court, the registering authority is not having any po$rer to restrain the persons to cnter into sale tra nsactions' As per the Standing Order 219' if any of the injunction order 4. granted by the competent civil Court not to entertain any alienation, thi: said orders are binding on the registering authority and in the absence of any injunction prohibiting for entertaining the registration, the registering authority is not hzrving any power to refuse registration Admittedly' in the said suit there is no in-junction order prohibiting to entertain registration' Therefore' this writ petition is misconceived and is liablc to bc disrrrissed' 5 Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed There shall be no order as to costs-

6. As a sequel, the shall stand closed. misce llaneous pe titions pending' if any' //TRUE COPY// SD/.S. MALLI KARJUNA RAO ISTANT REGISTRAR S SECTION OFFICER \ To, SRI. RAM PRASAD TEEGALA AdVOCAtE [OPUC] GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana '1 . One CC to 2. Two CCs to louTl Two CD CoPies 3 KKS GJP fl+ HIGH COURT DATED:0310212025 1oi TE, . C) .$' ,ii: -/ \\ s\ x o iu- \ ORDER WP.No.2849 of 2025 I l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I :. 6 2S t/, z.)