Mohd Sadiq v. Smt.K. Annapurna, Wo Sri K. Satyapal Goud
Case at a glance
- Bench
- VLLL
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With this direction, the present Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this civil revision petition shall stand closed. /ffRUE COPY// SD/. B. REKHA RANI S ISTANT REGIST CTION OFFICER To…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:2477 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the Order Dated 26.11.2021 passed in 1.A.No.461 of 2019 in A.S.9 of 2017 on the file of the Vlll Additional District Judge, at Nizamabad. Between: Mohd Sadiq, S/o Shaik lmam Aged about 62 Occ. Pensioner, R/o H.No. t 0.9.13, Khilla Chowrasta, Nizamabad, Presently at Hyderabad. ...Petitioner
/Appellant AND Smt.K. Annapurna, Wo Sri K. Satyapal Goud , Aged 44 Years, Occ: Tailor and Swimming Trifler R/o Flat No ,A2 Singamitra Arcade near Baswa Garden Function, Vinayak Nagar Nizamabad. ...RespondenUDefendant Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHAIK AHMED ALl. Representing SRI MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG Counsel for the Respondent: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TfI(ARAMJI ClttrL REVISION PETITION No.2477 cf 2o25
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the revlslon petitioner aggrieved by the r rder dated
26.11.2021 in I.A. No.461 of 2Ol9 in A.S. 1,o.9 of 2017 on the file of the learned VIII Additional I)i ,,trict Judge, 1 Nizamabad.
Heard Mr. Shaik Ahmed Ali, le:rnr:d counsel, representing Mr. Mirza Nisar Ahmed 13;lig Nizami, learned counsel for the revision petitioner
At hearing, it is brought to the notrt e that after passing the impugned order, the appeal sr it itself has been dismissed for default and against thz-r, order a civil miscellaneous appeal has been hled ancl he same is pending on the file of this Court
Having regard to this position and e s the issue involved in this revision would be su: ject to the restoration of appeal suit, by granting I lrerty to the z revision petitioner to file ar appropriate application for revival after the appeal is restored to hle.
Operative part
With this direction, the present Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this civil revision petition shall stand closed. /ffRUE COPY// SD/. B. REKHA RANI S ISTANT REGIST CTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Vlll Additional District Judge at Nrzamabad - ^ i. d; c..i,tJ$iMit.; xisai nnrieo Baig' Advocate [oPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies NVB/gh w HIGH COURT DATED:0410312025 ORDER CRP.No.2477 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION 6coRRtA &t"-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.