High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more parthularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent M. 2 to 4 herein in not stopping the iflegar and unauthorised construction being carried out by the Sth Respondent herein in contrary to the sanctioned pran and buirding permission vide Lr.No. 266946/cHMC r419912023dated- ogto3t2023, as iregar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation Act'1955 and arso Ts-bpass Act,2020 and consequenry direct the Respondent l'lc .2 to 4 herein to revoke the building pernrrssi rn vide Lr.No. 266946/GHt\,4() I t1)912023, dated- 09/03i2023, and to d€'molish :he illegal and unauthorised cc ns.tructions already carried out by the 5th Re sporrdent herein in premises i.e., H N,r 6-3-188, Jai Nagar Colony, New Bhoi-ttuda Se cunderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition r nc t:r Section 1 51 CPC praying that in th() circurr stances stated in the affidavi': fllel in support of the petition, the High Cc,urt ma) be pleased to direct the Respr:,n,ients No. 2 to 4 herein not to give, issianc;e at d process any further clearances'permission including but not limited to ssLanc,) of occupancy certificate to th(r pr3mises i.e, H.No. 6-3-188, Jai Nagar,:;ol,lny. I'1ew Bhoiguda, Secunderabact ;rerrding disposal of the above Writ Petition lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition t.nce,r Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the, c rcurrstances stated in the affidavi . f le i ,n support of the petition, the High C: u11 may be pleased to direct the Resipondent No.2 to 4 herein to consr:er ;:nC dispose the representatior s r:omplaints submitted by the petition€ r i,erei .r vrde dated- O21O112025 and 2)t(.)112025 by stopping the construction wc rk r premises i.e, H.No. 6-3-188, Jai Nagar Colony, New Bhoiguda. {jecrnderabad pending disposal of tho i1b(),() Writ Petition. Counsel for the Pr:titioner: SRI B.ARJUN RAO Counsel for the Rr:spondent No.1: AGP FOR MCPL ADMr.l URBAN DEV Counsel for the Rr:spondent No.2 to 4: SRI G.MADHUSUETHAN Rl::DDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made, the following: ORDER I I ! I l HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.2802 of2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No. 1 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4. perused the record.

2. In view of the nature of relief sought by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage dispensing with notice to respondent No.5.

3. Petitioner herein is resident ol Chacha Nehru Nagar, New bhoiguda, Hyderabad. Respondent No.S has obtained building permission for construction of stilt for parking + 2 upper floors, whereas, she has constructed hve floors without leaving setbacks. The said construction is in deviation to the building permit order. Therefore, the same is unauthorized construction. petitioner has submitted a representation, dated 02.O1.2025 ro respondent No.4 with a request to take action against rcspondent No.5. Despite ,// K'J \\/. '}.No.2802 of 2ul5 2 receiving rrnd acknowledging the said repres( ntation, responctent No.4 did not act upon the samt:' lt'g51r ieved by the sai 1 irLir,:tion of respondent No'4, petilior,er iled the present r,,rit ttetition.

4. Wh,:r':rs. Sri G. Madhusudhan IQedtil'. learned StandirLg llr>unsel appearing for responclent I o.4, on instructir:,ns, would submit that responcient No.4 will inspect tlrr: site, consider the repres€r.1t:ltior. dated 02.Ol.i',O'.2i; submitted by the petitiont:- ,rn<1 il the allegatiorrs lade by the petitioner are founri to be correct, he will I ak er action against respondent \lo Ii sl r-ictly in accorrlitr ct: with the procedure laid do',vrL ur der the Telarrgirr a lr.{unicipalities Act, 2019 (for :;hc r t :l-rc Act' 2019) b'. Jrrrtting the petitioner and resp':nrl--rr1 No 5 on notice irr rd irtTording them an opportunity o[ he.Lr-in ..

5. lrL h,: iight of the said submissions, tLris \Vri Pet ition IS dispor',e'l of directing respondent No.4 1o rol' 'idcr the repre s(rrl1zition, dated O2.O7.2025, inspect tht: si e and il the allc:rra i(,ns made by the petitioner at'e IoL.tr rcl to be: i* KL,J W.P.No.2802 of 2025 3 t I i i I : correct, he shall take action against respondent No.S strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Act, 2079 by putting the petitioner and respondent No.5 on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of reieipt of copy of this order. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. AMMAJI IS ANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, j 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 The Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development ffi ,,#;""t,'G;iiri"f erildtg't' Hvderabad' state of relangana' The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad lrilunrcipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. The Zonal Commissioner, Greater. Hyderabad tvlunicipal Corporation, Secunderabad Zone, Secunderabad' HyoeraDao ' The DeDutv Commissioner, Greater , Begump6t Circle -30, Begumpet, Hy0eraoao One CC to SRI B-ARJUN RAO, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' SC FOR GHIVC [OPUCI TwoCCsToGPFORMCPLADMNURBANDEV'HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad [OUT] Hyderabad trlunicipal Corporation' I Two CD CoPies o 8 BSR GJP HIGH COURT DATED: 03111212025 ORDER WP.No.2802 of 2025 e o .J /'/" c? ==i=rHl: ;fA i(: 2$,ilN 20fi t ,. o iCHE ) ? L, {' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION' WITHOI'T COSTS \\ 2\ ( A' W