✦ High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Oct 2025
Length
1,132 words

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. Np.t23 of 2024 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the matter has been referred to the Lok Adalat constiruted by the High court Legal services committee. Hyderabad, for settlement, and after due deliberations, the Lok Adalat passed an award on

13.09.2025 as per the terms agreed upon b,v rhe parties. 2- In view of the aforesaid subnrission, rhis Appeal is disposecl of in tbrms of the award dated 13.09.2025 passed bi, rhe High Court Legal Services Committee. No cosrs.

3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shail stands'closed. .. SD/. T.SRINIVASAREDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1' The MACT-.um-XXV Additionar chief Judge, city civir court at Hyderabad. 2. Lhg sg"r.t ry, Hrgh court t-egais"ri"". c"om;i-f,ee,-riigr, court Buirdings at KONDADTAJAY KUMAR Ac 9Q to -SRt. gg E sHi *'[ ]VfiANDLU Advocate {dFff3j" CD Copies [oPt c] Hyderbad. One One Two

3. 4. 5. GE/PSLw Enclosing along with a copy of Lok Adatat Award HIGH COIJRT DATED:25 t1Ot2OZs i { I JUDGMENT MACMA.No.123 ot 2024 ) t * lHE S 2 7 F[B llllfi * OIS.POSTNG OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWEhO 6ld la-[ I '! , t I i j,l :::ilt ' e,,'' (Before the Hon' High Court) (On the file of the XXV AGAINST tW.o.P._No.470 of 2o19 Additiona[ Chief Judge, City Civit Court at Hyderabad) MGIr{A.No.123 of 2o2a Eetween:- lclcl Lombard Generat rnsurance co. Ltd.,.secoM. Ftoor, shop No- 7 to r , & 1 g to 20, Lumbini Jewet Matt, Road No.2, Banja. riittrrtnya".uuut, nlp.uv its Legal Manager, Door No- 6-3-352t1,3'd Froor, osman praza, Road No.1, Banjara Hitts, panjagutta, Hyderabad-5@037. l ,I ,l i i Jl 1 2. 3. 4

2. Counsel for the Appe(lants /C{airnants Counsel for the Representative Respondent /l nsurance Conrpany of lnsurance Conpany i ....Respondents Sri K. Hanmandtu, Advocate Sri K- Ajay Kumar, Advocate Sri Mohammed Abdul, Shabbeer Senior Manager - Legat Ctaims J c ; I i I I I i :' ! ! i i i i i I I I i i, i I i I I I i I i I i I i '.'_-'-. t,E: =li.:ir::-if!ltf, :ii.i . _ i1-.; : : E: - Compensation Awarded (Setttement Reached) ih the Lok Adatat. HIGH COURr LOK AOALAT €#r{r' Rs. 30,56,000/ propor"tionate petition with interest @: .- .- . .. ..1 .. onty) with :l date of: MACMA No.123 of 2A24 has been preferi'ed by MACMA No.304 of 2024 has been preferred by the'PetitionerslCtaimants against the orders passed in'MVOP No.470 of 2019 by the Trjbunat. Gompahy The Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Ngs:1 to 4 atong with their counse[ and Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager-Legat Ctaims for the lnsurance Company have appeared and identified before the Lok Adatat. During the pendency of both Appeats, the Appettants/ Petitioners/ Ctaimants and Respondent-lnsurance Company represented that they have mutuatty entered into compromise and settied the rnatter. ln pursuance of the same, the Appettantsl Petitioners/Ctaimants have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.21,38,6271- (Rupees Twenty-one lakhs thirty-eight thousand six hundred and twenty-seven only) in addition to the amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company. towards futt and finat setttement of their claim and the lnsurance Corlpany has agreed to pay 'thE 3afrd tfrverds futt and final settQqnar{ of the claim. Accordfngty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. . ln view of the settlement, the lnsurance Company shatt pay the above said amount within a period of one (1) month frorn the date of receipt of copy of this award after deducting the amount that was deposited, in any. ln the event of default or detay in making such deposit, the Ctaimants/Appettants are entitted to claim iftterest as awarded by the Tribunat. Apportionment of Compensaticn, if The apportionment among the lClaimant Nos.l to 4 shatt be made as per the apportionrnent determined by the Tribunat in M.V.O.P. No .470 of 2019. Additional Direction(s): 1. The Appettants are entitted to the refund of Court Fee pgid i,f these appeats. 2.The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Coinpany if any, shatl trd given credit to. 3.5oon after deposit by the lnsurance'Company, the Appettant/Petitionerlclaimant Nos. 1 to 4 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts. : tn token ol consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counset have signed this a'arard in our presence. lntermsrtf thecompromisearrivedatbetweentheparties, theserrtACAtANo.l23 of ?0?4 and lvlAClytA I'1o.304 of 7024 stand disposed of. i ln Act'a F\'t N ':.,1*r-, 13 r) Appellant (s) I grSrce<av lapn g tguv't@ 2 ?istce.rery Suaryaltet B-, g, ?q;r . prBtceua.y ,Wqnolr.tt ,r'?)/gl"'/ +' pt.g Lervaz- '.'r !, ** r qe+63 \9P, n tga^/r,4 Member

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments