The High Court · 2025

12.Smt. Fouzia Ather, Wo. Mulla AzherAhmed, D/o. Late Mohd. Muzafferuddin Mahmood Khan, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Household, PJo.16-2-22, Akbar Bagh, Behind Govt. Press, Malakpet, Hyderabad-SOo 036

13.Smt. Sadia Anwer,, W/o. Md. Junaid Ali Khan, D/o, Late Mohd. Muzafferuddin Mahmood Khan, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Household, Rlo. 16-2-511811 , Akbar Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad-S0O 036.

14.Smt. Arshia Kauser, Wo. MumtazAhmed Jaleel, D/o. Late Mohd. Muzafferuddin Mahmood Khan, aged about 48 years, Occ. Household, R/o. 17-9-1731E, Karmaguda, Yakutpura, Hyderabad-500 059. l5.Mohammed Habeebuddin, S/o. Mr. Mohammed Basheeruddin, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No. 16-2-5119, Akbar Bagh, Malakpet, Amberpet, Hyderabad-SOO 036. 'l6.Smt. Shameerunnisa Faeana,, Wo. Mohd. lmtiaz Hussain D/o. Mr. Mohammed Basheeruddin, aged about 69 years, Occ.Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 16-2-721 , Akbar Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad-500036.

17.Smt. Najeeb Sultana,, Wo. Mohammed Salahuddin, D/o. Mr. Mohammed Basheeruddin, aged about 64 years, Occ.Housewife, R/o. H.No.16-2- 51/9,Akbar Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad-S0O 036.

18.Smt. Nafees Rehana,, Wo. Yousuf Hasan Khan, D/o. Mr. Mohammed Basheeruddin, aged about 54 years, Occ.Housewife, Ft/o. H.No. '17-2-607, Mehdipura colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad-500 036.

19.Smt- Naseem Rizwana,, W/o. Mohd. Shakir Siddiqui, D/o. Mr. Mohammed Basheeruddin, aged about 57 years, Occ.Housewife, Rl/o, H.No.16-2- 61lN1l4lA, P.M. Residency, First Floor, Plot No.102, Akbar Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad-500 036.

20.Mr. Ahmed Abdul Rawoof,, Sio. Gulam Ahmed, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.18-2-43l3tN64,Ghazi Millathtolony, Charidrayanagutta, Bandlaguda, Keshavgiri, Hyderabad-500 005.

21.Smt. Ayesha Fatima,, Wio. Mohd. Nayeem Ahmed Khan, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Housewife, Rlio. Block No.22, B Block, Malakpet, Hyderabad-SO0 036.

22.Smt. Salma Fatima,, Wio. Shaik Abdul Aleem, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, Ri/o. H. No.'1 7-3-309/1, Murtuza Nagar, Yakutpura, Charminar, Hyderabad-500 023.

23.Gulam Ahmed,, S/o. Late Shaik Fareed, Aged about 88 years, Occ.Senior Citizen, Rl/o. H.No. 18-2-43131N64 Ghazie Millaf Colony, Chandrayanagutta, Bandlaguda, Keshavgiri, Hyderabad-500 005.

24.Habeeba Fatima, W/o. Mohammed M. Ahmed Farooqui, D/o. Gulam Ahmed, aged about 42 years, Occ.Housewife, R/o. 20-6-365/10/A, Rooplal Bazar, Shalibanda, Behind Shah Ghouse Hotel, Charminar, Hyderabad. 7

25. Mr. Eedr-rlakanti chiranjeevi Goud,, S/o. Eedurakanti Barraj Goud, Aged about 4/ yrs, Occ. Business, RUo. H.No.2-95, Sardarnagar Villag-e, Mahesiraram Mandal, Ranga Reddy-SO1 359.

26. Paladugu Sam[asiva Rao,, S/o. p.Venkateswarlu, Aged about 65 yrs, Occ. 27 ZA Business, Rl/o. Flat No.1702, The Botanica Apartmen-t, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, R. R. District, nyOer5OaO_SOo OSz, Y1-l:^ll1^Ygqcale,lnjg LLP.., Rep, by its Designated partner Sri Lingata :3llaT Rggdy, S/9 Lingata Reddy, R/o 8_i _298/8/1 , 5th Ftoor, uwaraka Nagar, Shaikpet, Golconda, Hyderabad-Soo OOB. f,/11, !.verOreel Infra Devetopers, Rep. by its Managing partner, Sri Y,e?.rs,l_eslyar AteKhya fowers, Bairamalguda, L.B. Nagar, Hydeirabad_S00 079. Redjry.Sudini, Sto. S Siiniv-as Reddy,*R/5. Ftat No. 1244, ^Lakshma zs V{: Purvansh Holdings Private Limited, Rep. bv its Authorised Sionarorv trrlr p;venf?re f\agarju1, S/o. B.Nagaraja Naidu, R/b. H.No.1_18/HtE/iln_2, 4in rroor, Hotrday. tnn.txpress and Suites, Road No.2, Gachibowli, Nanakramguda, Hyderabad-500 032.

30. Sreenidhi Eco-Spaces LLp., Rep, by its Authorised Sionatory, Mr. Linoam Krran Kumar, S/o. Late Jag-an-Mohan Rao, R/o.plot N6.105rM, Roadtto.+S, Jubilee Hirrs, Hyderabad-Sb0 033. (R.R. to to:o aie not neceiir.v pirti".i' ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, irre Hign court may be pleased to .sulrend the operation of the impugned order passed on o2to1r2o2s in W.P.No.37l56/2024. Counsel for the Appellant: SRt VIJAy B. pAROpAKARt Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: K. VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to g: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.9: Ms. D. MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CIIIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAT'L AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENI'I(A YARA WRIT APPEAL No. 145 of 2o25 JUDGMENT lPer tLrc Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul) Heard Sri Vrjay B Paropakari, learned counsel for the appellants; Sri K. Venkata Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.4 to 8 ald Ms. D Madhavi, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), for respondent No.9.

2. The opening argument of leamed counsel for the appellants is relating to the last paragraph of interim order passed by learned Single Judge. He submits that the status quo was directed to be maintained pending frling of counter affrdavits' Since counter a-ffidavits have already been filed, the interim order pales into insignificance. He further submits that the counter has already been f-rled by the present appellants' Since there are civil suits pending between the parties, the writ remedy is not the proper remedy. On a specific query from the Bench, he fairly admitted that, at present, the Writ Court has not decided the question of entertainability/maintainability considering the pendency of civil suits. { I I I I 2

3. In this view of the matter, since as per appellant himself ad interim order of status quo does not survive upon filing the counters and the matter is pending before the Writ Court, we {ind no reason to entertain this Writ Appeal. If the appellants have raised such objection of maintainability/entertainability before the Writ Court, t1le said Court is best suited to decide the said aspect and at this stage, there is no occasion for us to assume the jurisdiction of Writ Court. The Writ Appeal is misconceived and accordingly disposed of. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, sha1l also stand closed. //TRUE coPY/t SD/.K.SAILESHI DEPUry REGISTRAE- lNtr:;--- \ SEbTION OFFICER \ To, i I

1. One CC to SRI VIJAY B. PAROPAKARI, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI K. VENKATA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms. D. MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 4. iil Ccs to cp FoR REVENUE, High Coud for the State of Telangana'

5. Two CD Copies BN LS u HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 JUDGMENT WA.No.145 of 2025 Se1 T T q ) :.) U0 ?l?5 c: o, F .;.? (' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS n 6 \f"