Lahari Kolanupaka v. Deputy Collector on 17 Oct 2025

Order

FiIe This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: ,,...to issue an appropriate Writ' order or Direction more particula'ii'ot" in the nature of Writ of Mandamus aectiing that the order of the Second proceedings bearing Respondent in No.1786O lcll2()tg a"t"a 15'06'202O on the basis of attegea notilication vide No.E5/a7 33 I 2o13/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally' 26.09.2org i""'"1'by the pi"t'i"t Collector' contrary to the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 25'08'2014 in by confirming the rejection order WP.No.19069 'i 'O14 of the third respondent bearing No'ZO of 2019 dated registration in a selective manner "the 19.11 .2()lg '"*-"t"* alleged letter bearing on the u""[ No.B/322 l2Oo;' J"ta Og'Oq'ZOrt issued bv the Tahsildar .t'd' O"O"' Collector' Serilingampally Mandal, in respcct of the sale d'eed dated Lg 'O6'2OL9 executed i, fr;;;; of the petitioner herein vide pending Document No'SZg of 2olg for Plot No'2OO sq. yards in Sy'No'36/AA/ 19 & admeasuri.rg 36lAA]2O, situated tt gtotk No'l' (presently known as Pattabhi Nagar) Gopanpally Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Itangareddy District as being illegal' arbitrary' discriminatory' contrary .to '^Y' . ' "{:::t jurisdictio"u'1""o'" and violative of the principles of natural iustice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents forthwith to receive and register the Gift bearing Pending Document Deed dated in f*"'" of the petitioner and No.373 of 2Ot9 "*""'ted to pass such other order or orders"'" -lg.o6.2}Lg, 'zoo 'e s:',_rer'i1

2. l{eard Mr. Y.Pandarinath Goud, learned counsel for petitio:eer and Ms. D.Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Goverrrment Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for reslrondents.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the subject matter in the present writ petition is identical to the subject matter in w.P.No.4475 of 2o2l & batch, that by common order dated 06.10.2025, this court allowecl the writ petitions. Hence, similar orders be passed in this writ petition.

4. Fc,r reasons alike, as stated in the common order, dated o6.lo.2'J25, in w.P.No.44T5 of 2o2l & batch and in terms thereof, the writ Petition is allowed, "qua" the writ petitioner, "qud' the prayer. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ Petition shall stand closed. That the Rule Nisi has been made absotute as above. ' witness THE HON'BLE THE cHrEF JUSTTCE sRr ApARESH KUMAR STNGH, on , this Tuesday, the seventh Day of october, r*o Thousand i*"nty Five ",rj To //TRUE COPY// Sd/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT S

1. The Spet:ial Chief .gecretary,. Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Brock, 4th- Fro;i, t'"higi;; E;"rJi;ii"t, Hyd"rabad _ sooo22. 2 l?8"3i:[''h,ffffI3l r,!li3iT"i:,f",.fl:!agr,],n,,,,DA Kukatpa,ry, ' I}[ta'lh:'3gl.:,,.4,.;"n?,Blfllf,frlfJl;,*)"_l;?3ir,.Sr1.i,,o,,r,l."o,j,#i1:

4. One CC to SRI Y. PANDARINATH GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] S. Two CCs to GP for STAIr/PS and REGISTRATION , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] / "/

6. Two CD CoPies \ (Along with a copy of the Common Order dated. 06.10.2025 in W.P No.4475 of 2021 & batch) PMK/MP 0 HIGH COIJRT DATED:0711012025 o D E WP.No.3466 ot 2021 f ( STAI€ 1 FT n 'I.. .i: \t;.,. jk t);=,", p i,-i'i ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION II I OUT GOSTS THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUI(AI{TI 509 368 5435. 5436, 5926 678L.8331 and 88OO of 2o21 118 6238, s44L, 5446.677L 6772, 6779, 15 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.4475of2o2|isfiledwiththefollowing prayer: *... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No'576/G1 l2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No'85 of 2Ol9 dated lr9fit1zOt9, in respect of the Plot No'65 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the aieged notification dated 26/O9l2Ol3 in File No.E5/473 3 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated OS/O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector' Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective melnner as being itlegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contra-ry to law' suffers frolr.irri"aictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated rcjOZ1ZO19, bearing Pending Document No' P455/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass"'" W.P.No.4480 of 2021 is filed with the following 2 prayer: 2 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1B l93lGl l2Ol9 17 /06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.99 of 2Ol9 dated 19/ll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.303 in Survey Nos.36/A4/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2OO7, dated OglO9/2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitraqr, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 25 lO7 l20l9, bearing Pending Document No.P5O4/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4494 of 2O2L is filed with the following 3 praJrer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.586/G L/2O2O ' dated 16l06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.199 of 2OL9 dated 2I/lIl2Ol9, in respect of the Plot No.42 in Survey Nos.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated.26l09/2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No-B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, \a 3 JAK'J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law' suffers froi, iurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct thq respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated rcjOSlZOtg,bearing Pending Document No' P667 /2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass"'" W.P.No.4502 of 2O2l is filed with the following 4 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No' 1837/G I l2ol9 -16.O6.2O2n confrrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal Proceedings bearing No' 104 of ZOt-g dated tg lll l2}l9, in respect of the Plot No' 181 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the aiteg"a notification dated 26109 /2013 in File No.Os/+i3 3 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampaily/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/Ogl2Otl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector' Serilingampatly Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal,lrbitr"ry, discriminatory, contrary to larv' suffers f.oi. iu.isaictional errors and violative of the principles of natuial justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated OS|OIIZOO, bearing Pending Document No'P576 of 20lgexecutedinfavourofthepetitionerandpass.-.,' W.P.No.4542 of 2O2l is filed with the following 5 prayer: '...to issue a an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus \': i JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18186/G1l20l9 dated 17 /0612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.97 of 2Ol9 dated in respect of the Plot No.186 in Survey l9/lll20l9, Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912OI3 in File No. E5/ 473 3 / 20 13 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, is a selective metnner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice mod violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 25/07l2ol9, bearing Pending Document No.P500 of 2019 executed in favour of .the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.5072 of 2O2l is filed with the following 6 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18185/G1l2O2O dated 17106/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1OO of 2Ol9 dated in respect of the Plot No.161 in Survey I9llll20l9 Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Rqddy District, acting on the alleged notihcation dated 2610912013 in File No. E5/473312013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OB|O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5z, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of soboar ''e-', i rrvvrqvou, ^cUlgareuuy ulslnc[, I elangana_ ... "-i:i.:.-_r;.: ., x) 5 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 l07 l2ol9, bearing Pending Document No.P526/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass... W.P.No.3681 of 2021 is filed with the following 7 prayer: File "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18183/Gl /2019 dated 17/0612020 acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 No.E5/4733/2O13 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal No.76 of 2Ol9 dated 19 /ll /2019, acting on the alleged letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l20L1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the PIot No.287 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O3/O7l2ol9, bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2Ol9 in a selective manner and contrary to the law laid down by this Honourable Court in W.P.No.19O69 of 2014 as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors -and violative of the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 3OOA of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O3/O712019 bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

8. W.P.No.3998 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: h g !r --s t EI 6 JAK'J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch '...to issue a an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction more particularly ot'" itt tttt nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No' 18189/ Gl l2OL9 dated the Order of the Third 1710612020 "ot'f"*L'g Respondent in Proceedings bearing No'82 of 2Ol9 dated in respect of the Plot No'73 in Survey lgltll2}lg Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the alteged notification dated 26lOgl2Ol3 in No.E5/473 3 / 2Ol3 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/3zzi2oo7, dated o8lo9l2ol1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector' Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory' contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O4lO7l2}lg, bearing Pending Document No'P442 of 20lg executed in fat'o'r of the petitioner and pass "'" g. W.P.No.5O80 of 2O2L is filed with the following -File prayor: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction more particularly ot" it' the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No'58llcll2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O cot'firmiig the Qrder of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No'1O2 of 2Ol9 dated tOittl2}lg, in respect ot the Plot No'128 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpatly Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the alleged notification dated 26lO9l2ol3 in File No.ES / 473 3 I 20 13 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl3zzi2oo7, dated o}log/2o11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector' @lelh # rdts,o,rf-ffi*a.€*:t- rr.- r xuq*;#*'f.**:3:l?r*ri14"+.--- . -g..\,q,ewLry rJlstnct, I elangana_ 7 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 07 /OB/2019, bearing Pending Document No.p565/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass...,,

10. W.P.No.5O91 of 2021 is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No-572/Gt /2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.75 of 2Ol9 dated 19.7L.2O19, in respect of the Plot No.l33 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2OI3 in File No. E5/473 3 /2013 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and. further dirett the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 l06/2019, bearing Pending Document No.p4l6/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass..."

11. W.P.No.S118 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: '...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 8 JAK.J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch declaring that the order the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.905/G1/2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.84 of 2Ol9 dated L9/ltl2OI9, in respect of the Plot No.140 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6,situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alteged notification dated 26/09l2ol3 in File No. E5 / 473 3 / 20 13 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9|2OL1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contraqt to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06l07 l2019, bearing Pending Document No.P446/ 19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

12. W.P.No.5145 of 2021 is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.57l lGl l2O2O dated 16l06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.74 of 2OL9 dated l9lll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.l31 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notilication dated 26l09l2Ol3 in File No. E5 / 473 3 / 20 13 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l2Oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of r--. u, rlrrffi'*r?*@;'ffii$, -i.Im#:-- 04 9 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 27 /O6/2Ot9, bearing pending Document No.p4 tS/ Lg executed in favour of the petitioners and pass..., 13' w'P'No.5399 of 2o2r is fired with the forowing prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.lg20l/ GL /2)tg 17.06.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in proceedings bearing No.130 of 2Ol9 dated 27.ll.2oLg, in respect'of the plot No.l1l in Survey Nos.36/44/ 1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting the aileged notification dated ZO.Og.ZO\S in File No.E5/473 3 / 2OL3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpalty, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OOZ, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitraqr, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and SOb_A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and. register the SaIe Deed dated 25.1O.2O19, bearing pending Document No.pT56/2Ot9 executed in favour of the petitioner arrd pass...,, -on

14. W.P.No.5415 of 2O2t is prayer: filed with the following '...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18 190/ ct /2OLg dated L7.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third l0 JAK.J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch .1 Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1 10 of 2Ol9 dated 19.11.2019, in respect of the Plot No.2B in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2OI3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 I Serilingampally I Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated IL.O9.2O19, bearing Pending Docurnent No.p646/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

15. 'W.P.No.5420 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer': "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.580/GI /2O2O dated 16.06.2020 conhrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1O1 of 2OL9 dated Lg.lL.2O19, in respect of the Plot No.3O5 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification 'FiIe No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated

26.09.2013 * JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

27.O7.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P527 /2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

16. W.P.No.5429 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.1835/GL /2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing 132 of 2019 dated 21,llI/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.110 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification 'dated 26109 /2013 in File No. E5/473 3 / 20 I 3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 28lLO/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P763/2Ot9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

17. W.P.No.5435 of 2O2L is filed with the following i prayer: '...to issue as an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. IB2OO lcl /2OL9 dated 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1 17 of 2OL9 dated l9lll/2oI9, in respect of the Plot No.257 in Survey situated at Gopanpally Village, 36/ AAI ll, t2 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 261O9 /2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 /2OL3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l2oll stated to been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 16l09l2O19, bearing Pending Document No. P665/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

18. W.P.No.5436 of 2O2I is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18199/G | /2019 dated 17.06.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1 16 of 2OL9 dated 19.11.2019, in respect of the Plot No.268 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notif,rcation dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 16.O9.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P664/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." 13 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch ,

19. W.P.No.5926 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing NoJ8l77lGLl2Ol9 dated 17l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No'73 of 2019 dated in respect of the Plot No-80 in Survey lgllll2}lg, Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File No.E5/473 3 l2Ol3 /Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the Eistrict collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OB/O9/2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being iltegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2l I 06l 2019, bearing Pending Document No'P384/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass "'" W.P.No.6234 of 2O2L is filed with the following 20 prayer: i "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.574/G1/2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O conf,rrming the Order of the Third Respond.ent in Proceedings bearing No'81 of 2Ot9 dated Lgllll2}l9, in respect of the Plot No'77 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2OL3 in File \ l4 JAK'J W-P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/473 3 I 2Ot3 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No-B/322f2oo7, dated o8lo9l2oll stated to have b-een issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector' -erilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory' contrary to law' suffers i.oir.;rrri"aictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 04lOTl2}l9, bearing Pending Document No' P44ll2OI9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass " '" W.P.No.6238 of 2021 is filed with the following

21. pra{er:. "... to issue a an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in f ro"..aI-rgs bearing No' 18187/ Gl l2Ol9 -l710612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No' 1 I 1 of 20 19 dated tOittlZOtg, in respect of the Plot No'188 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the att.ged notification dated 26'09'2013 in File No.Os/+i3 3 /2013 /Seritingampalty/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No. B/32212OO7, dated OB/O912011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector' Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law' suffers from iurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natuial justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the - respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated tti Og I ZOt9, bearing Pending Document No'P647 I 2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass "'' ). t5 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

22. W.P.No.5441 of 2O2I is filed with the following prayer: '...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1836/G | /2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1 13 of 2OI9 dated in respect of the PIot No.58 in Survey l9/lll20l9, No.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 261O9 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l2ol1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2I /O8l2Ol9, bearing Pending Document No.P659/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

23. W.P.No.5446 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: o...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.587lG1 l2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.12O of 2Ol9 dated 2l.ll.2Ol9,in respect of the Plot No.38 in Survey Nos.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification File

26.09.2013 l6 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 23.O9.2019, bearing Pending Document No. P6B9/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

24. W.P.No.6771 of 2O2L is filed with the following pra]'er: \ "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.l8l78lcl l2OL9 dated 17 /0612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.87 of 2Ol9 dated in respect of the Plot No.182 in Survey l9llll2ol9, Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2Ol3 in File No. E5/473 3 I 20 13 I Serilingam pally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8|O9/2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner ds being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale cum Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated lll07l2019, bearing Pending Document No. P459/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." f t7 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

25. W.P.No.6772 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.592/G1 l2O2O dated 16'06'2020 conf,rrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.152 of 2Ol9 dated 09'12'2O 19, in respect of the Plot No.362 in Survey Nos'36/AA/11' situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the atleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No'E5/4733120131 Serilingampallyl Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.l3l322l2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violatiye of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated O6.lL.2}lg, bearing Pending Document No'P777 /2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass "'"

26. W.P.No.6779 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.593/G1/2O2O dated 16l06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No- 154 of 2Ol9 dated Ogll2l2olg, in respect of the Plot No'98 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File ,. _;**a|i]:..,. .. l 18 JAK'J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/473 3l2}l3l Serilingampellyl Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8lO9l2Oll stated to harre been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law' suffers f.ol-, iuA"aictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of Ind'ia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated tS 1 tt 1ZOt9, bearing Pending Document No' P787 12019 executed. in favour of the petitioner and pass"'" W.P.No.6781 of 2O2l is filed with the following

27. prayor: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declarlng that the order of the Second Respondent in p.oceedings bearing No'9352/Gl l21l9 -l7l06l2OrO confirming the Order of the tl"1 Respond.ent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No'40 of ZOf-g aated 2OlOSl2Ol9, in respect of the Plot No'82 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' acting on the a-ieged notification dated 26lO9l2ol3 in File No.E5/473 3 / 2Ol3 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally' said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212CO7, dated O8lO9l2Ol1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector' Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being itlegal, arbitru.ry, discriminatory, contrar5r to law' suffers froi-r.1,-r.isaictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and" register the Sale Deed dated ZojoSlZOtg, bearing Pending Document No' P3O1 l2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass"'" 14 '.ia t9 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

28. W.P.No.8331 of 2O2l is filed with the following pfayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1 4009 / c L / 20 19 dated OBIOT /2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.34 of 2019 dated O2/O5/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.51 in Survey Nos.36/AA/11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2013 in File No. ES l 4733 /2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No-B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrarTr to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 02 / OS / 2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P262 / 2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner ard pass..."

29. W.P.No.8800 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to register the Sale Deed pending document No.878 of 2O2O submitted by the petitioner for registration with regard to the Plot bearing No.3 Part admeasuring244.44 sq yards in Shilpa Poineer Block-I in Sy.Nos.37 of Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District vide refusal order No.2l7 of 2O2O dt.l7 /12/2O2O as highly illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the 3.a 20 JAK,J of 2021 & batch W.P.No.44?5 ,esponden,.:::,Ii:"-?=Ji+:il"$l#k"ilJ",.X: ;:l,tT:"ff':;r}","" *nn '"*11r" in Shirpa p:11"", i,".;;;; admeasuri.'s 244'44 "'"'II#;;ti X;il ;,'',, .:IlT:i. rii.:::,:i:", U:Tffi l: Serilingamo.i"' *# the Proceedings and Pass "' ;;' pi"tri"t cott village' c Rao' learned counsel for 30. Heard Mr' B'Venkateswara petiti'rners and Ms' Dara Haritha Kiran learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents' 31. The subject matter in all the Writ Petitions pertains of Survey No'36 situated to Pl-ots in various Sub-divisions Mandal' Ranga at riopanpall1l ViIIage' Serilingampally Reddy District' For reference' facts in W'P'No'3681 of 2O2t are being considered (Serial No'7 in the batch of writ Petitions)' relusingtoreceiveandregistertheAgreement,ofSale-cum- 32 It is the grievance of petitioner that respondents are lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O3'O7 '2019 bt:aring document No'433 of 2Or9 in respect of Plot No'287 ir' Sy'No' 36lAAp (Sub Division No'8 of Sy'No'36) situated at Gopanpally Village' Serilingampally FleddyDistrict.Itissubmittedthatthedocumenthasbeen Mandal' Ranga *l d 2l JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch kept pending on the file of Sub Registrar on the ground that a notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2O13lSerilingampally/Gopanpally issued by District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7 dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar. It is further submitted that Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, refused the registration of document that the scheduled property is prohibited as per the list furnished by Tahsildar, classified as Poramboke.

33. Attention is invited to Ex.P3 a letter addressed to the Sub-Registrar by Tahsildar.

34. It is submitted that order of refusal of Sub-Registrar was carried by way of an appeal before the District Registrar and the District Registrar vide proceedings dated L7.06.2020 (Ex.Pl) refused. registratiron of the deed on the premise that property in Sy.No.36 / AAlS was included in the prohibited property list vide notification in File No.E5/4733/2O13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, dated

26.O9.2OL3, issued by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and as such the property could not be registered. 22 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

35. It is submitted that notification relied upon by the Registrar in his order dated 17.06.202O is in parimateria to the rLotihcation which was the subject matter of challenge before this Court and that this Court in W-P.No- 19069 of 2OL4 by its order dated 25.08.2014 had directed the Sub- Regis;trar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance subjr:ct to the condition that Sub-Registrar was at liberty to refuse to register the deeds by duly assigning reasons. Placing reliance upon the judgment of the learned Single Judg,e, it is contended that the said notification annexed at Page No.26 being in parimateria to that of the notification unde,r challenge in the W.P.No. L9O69 of 2014, the notification dated 26.O9.2O13 has to receive the same fate.

36. l,earned counsel invited the attention of this Court to the ,locument annexed to the counter affidavit'filed and subreitted that the list communicated by the District Colle:ctor to Commissioner & Inspector General vide letter No.E1 /447812024, dated 07.O4.2025, is a subsequent list and the same cannot be relied upon, as the order of the Regi,strar and the Sub-Registrar are based on different 23 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch notification (earlier dated) and letter of Tahsildar. It is submitted that by letter dated 07.O4.2O25, properties are added to and a revised list of immovable properties is issued and the said survey number finds place in the said list. It is further submitted that reliance placed on a list dated O7.O4.2O25 is misconceived and is not valid in the eye of law as the rejection orders of both the Sub-Registrar and that of Registrar are based on different lists and the letter dated 07.O4.2O25 cannot have a retrospective effect.

37. Placing reliance on the Honble Apex Court judgment in Commissioner of Police, Bombag a. Gordhandas Bhanjil, it is contended that orders once made, the purport of the order and content cannot be improvised and has to be read and understood on the contents of the order itself. It is further contended that any improvement made by way of counter affidavit or submissions cannot be added to change the Purport of the order.

38. Basing on the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court, it is contended that notification dated 26.09.2013 of 'arn tgsz sc to \ 24 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, fell for consjderation before this Court and learned Single Judge of this lourt by order dated 25.08.2014 in w.P.No.19069 of 2Ol4 directed the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deed,s of conveyance without reference to the Notification date<l 26.O9.2OL3.

39. It is submitted that as the subject matter i-e., plots in various subdivided survey number(s) of Sy.No.36 are parct:ls of land in this batch of writ petitions which pertain to tt.e notification, this Court may consider the order of learr:ed single Judge, unless different set of facts are borne out c,f record.

40. It is submitted by learned counsel that as the facts are riimilar in nature, same order as in W-P.No- 19069 of 2Ol4 be passed

41. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Plea<ler for respondents submitted that on the basis of a comrnunication received, Tahsildar addressed a letter to Sub-Registrar, letter dated September, 2O11, that certain ,1 "i 25 JAKJ W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch properties in Serilingampally Mandal and the subject property of the writ petitioner was reflected as Government land(s) in the Khasra Pahani, hence prohibited from being registered. It is further submitted that District Registrar on appeal confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notification dated 26.09.2O13 issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. That the properties in Sy.No.36/AA one in the prohibited list.

42. [t is submitted that District Registrar has not erred in rejecting the documents and as such refusal to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioners in the writ petitions are in accordance with law. 43- Learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Honble Apex Court in Mohinder Singh Gill and another a. The Chief Election Cornrnissilon r, Neut Delhi and. others2, invited. the attention of this Court to Paragraph No.8 of the judgment, wherein the observations of Honble Justice Bose in Commissioner of Police, Bombag a. Gordhandas Bhanji (L supra) were extracted, on the basis 2 (tsza) l scc4os 26 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch of ttLe contents, it was contended that notification of the officr: of Collector have to be construed on the basis of language used therein.

44. It is submitted that pursuant to Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short 'the Act') various notilications were issued across the State by the offices of Dist:ict Collectors. That one such notification issued by the offic,: of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, is dated

26.09.2O13. It is further submitted that on the information and data collected/gathered at the ground level, properties in various survey numbers have been included in the notilication and the notification came to be issued on

26.09.2013. It is also submitted that Collector is empowered to issue notification under Section 22-A of the Act.

45. It is submitted that upon the exercise of powers und,:r Section 22-A of the Act, lands are included or listed undr-'r any of the Sub-Sections of Section 22-A(1)(a-e) of the Act. It is further submitted that lands in which the State Govr:rnment has "avowed" or "accrued" interest can also be 27 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch - included/listed in the notification under Section 22-A of i4 the Act, that the notifications are issued to protect the properties from being claimed as private properties, etc,. It is submitted that the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 19069 of 2014 is pertains to set of lands situated in Hafeezpet and the order may not be extended to other areas, as the order is very specific to particular parcels of land. It is further contended that on 07.O4.2O25, the said parcels of land in various subdivided survey numbers of Sy.No.36 in Gopanpally Village have been notified. It is also contended that the respondents be given liberty to proceed in accordance with law as the said plots in survey numbers have been included in the notification dated 07.O4.2O25 of the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

46. Heard learned counsels,- perused the record, considered the submissions.

47. In all these writ petitions, petitioners are purchasers of various plots in the main Survey No.36 of Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the specific case of all the petitioners that they presented 28 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch sale deeds, development agreements, gift deeds and agreement of sales before the Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally on various dates for registration. That Sub- Registrar without assigning any reasons refused regisl.ration. It is observed from the record that Sub- Registrar placed reliance on a communication of the office of T;rhsildar (Deputy collector cadre), serilingampally Manclal, d.ated Ni1.09.2011, Lr.No.B/32212017 (Page No.2l], P3) and refused registration.

48. On appeal District Registrar confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notification dated 26.01r.2013 issued by the office of District collector, Ranga Reddy District. That the properties are in prohibited list.

49. It was contended that the Sub-Registrar and the District .Registrar on appeal could not have refused registration of documents. It was further contended that the notification d.ated 26.O9.2OL3 was only a draft notification and the same cannot be relied. by the office of District Registrar. 29 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

50. It is pertinent to extract the relevant portion of the notification communicated to the office of Sub-Registrar. The same is as follows: THE RANGA REDDY DISTRICT GAZETTE EXTRA ORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY Ranga Reddy District Serilingampally Mandal Rajendranagar Division R.R. No. 86 File No. ES / 47 33 / 20 1 3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally Dated: 26-09-2013 APPendix NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred under G.O.Ms. No. 863 Rev. (Reg.1) Dept., dated: 20-6-200Z and CCLA's circular Instructions No. Bl/385/2O12, dated: 29-5-2013.. The following lands are notified under Section 22-A (l) (a) for the purpose of section 22A(L), Notice is hereby given inviting objections and suggestions on the above proposal from all persons who are likely to be affected thereby for being taken into considering by the Government. All objections and suggestions should be in writing in English or in Telugu and should be addressed to the Collector (by designation) of Ranga. Reddy District within whose jurisdiction the area lies, so as to reach tl:e office of the Collector, Ranga Reddy District on or before the expiry of thirty days from the date of publication of this notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette.

51. On a perLrsal of the notification dated 26.O9.2OL3 communicated which contains the list of prohibited properties, can at best be a notification calling for objections to arrive at a final list of prohibited properties. The notification cannot be termed as a final notification of prohibited properties upon which documents can be refused for registration. The notification relied on by the 30 JAK'J W.P.No.++ZS of 2021 & batch Distrjct Registrar cannot be said' to be in tune with the law laid clown bY the Full Bench'

52. A similar notification issued on 26'09'2013 fell for consideration before this Court in W'P'No'19069 of 2OL4' with the following PraYer: 26-os'io13, -. ,,... to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature ;f w;i of Mandamus declaring the Ranga Reddy nistrict, c it Notification R'R'No'86' issued ;;;;'d il""lN..Bs 1 +zss 1iot3/serilingampally/Hafeezpet .L dt.26.Og.2}13 by tt't-Z"a respondent in so far as rt of Hafeezpet village relates to lands i" iy'N"7S and !O Se rilin gampally Vranl't,- R' R' Oi"trilt. as ille gal' arb itrary and contrar5r to tie ptovisions of the Registration Act and consequently sef aside the same and grant such tt'i" Hon'lcle- Court may deem fit other order o. o'a"i" "" of the case'" ""Jo-p.t in the "i'"'*"t"ttces

53. A learned' Single Judge of this Court by order dated 25.08.2014 held as follows: Order: "It is the case of the petitioners 1 to 3 that they are the owrlers oi tf" tana aameasuring ncs"5O'O0 guntas in Survey No'Zg of Hafeezpet Village' The claim of the 4th petitio";;i" tr'"t t'" is tlhe owner ":d 1: l:]1 extent of land admeasunng i""""""i." "f ""othtt Acs. 1 1 5.OO grr.t,,"-itt S'-trvey No' SO-of Hafeezpet Village' iu't'g" Reddv District' The Serilingampally M;JJ' petitioners intend I t"fi the a6ove extJnts of land and when they appr"""rca the Sub-Registran' Moosapet' Hyderabad-+ttr responJent' they.were informed about the District Gazetti notifrcation issued by the. P'."tl"t Collector, Ranga il"aai J"t"d' 26'09'1913 in which the the affected persons against objections *.r. tttt fa.1" in Suryelflos'zz-,lA'^z^l the proposur to and80ofHafeezpetVillageof_Bal"n,ga.and ""ii"Jitom "oury 31 - JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch Serlingampally Mandals, Ranga Reddy District covered under C.S.No.14 of 1958 under Section 22_A of t]ne Indian Registration Act, 1908 (for short the Act).

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the said notification is without power or jurisdiction. A notification can be issued concerning the properties which are mentioned in Section 22(A)gl(el of the Act by the State Government and the District Collector has no power to notify any properties covered. by Section 22(A)(Il(el of the Act as the registration of Government lands by way of deeds of conveyance were piohibited. Learned senior counsel placed ieliance on earlier orders issued by the Government in memo No.28908/JA1l2OO4-1, dated 05.11.2004 and memo No.59734/JA.l/2OO5, dated 18.05.2009, which inter alia disclosed that these lands are treated. as private lands and directions were issued for mutation ir terms of the orders in C.S.No.14 of. 1958.

3. Learned senior counsel further submits that attempts made by the State Government in this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court have failed and therefore, the above orders are issued. Learned senior counsel therefore submits that the present notification issued by the District Collector treating it as sarkari is contrary tt the orders of the Government and the District Collettor does not have competence and power to overrule the orders of the Government and noti$r the subject land as sarkari land.

4. The matter underwent few adjournments at the instance of the learned Advocate General. When the matter is called, the Advocate General produced a memo frled by the 2nd respondent, wherein reference was made to the order of status quo passed by the Sup?eme Corrt in SLA (C) No(s).t2362-t236312}1+ and also orders passed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District in Case No.DS/5412/2014, dated 06.OB.2Ot4, suspending the mutation granted in respect of M/s.Savera construction.

5. Learned Advocate General submitted that in view of the order o f status quo granted by the Supreme Court and further orders passed by the Joint Collector suspending the mutation orders passed in favour of M/s.Savera construction, no further action can be taken. 32 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

6. Learned Advocate General submits that the lands in Survey Nos.77, 78, 79 and 80 of Hafeezpet Village are Government lands and that the Government is taking appropriate steps in this regard.

7. As regards the rival contentions on various issues concerning status of land and Government right to assert its title that cannot be gone into in this case.

8. The only issue for consideration in this writ petition is whether the notification issued by the District Collector amounts to prohibition of registration of lands mentioned therein concerning Survey Nos.77 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village in purported exercise of power under Section 22(A)(1)(e) of the Act.

9. Learned Advocate General submits that the notification in question is not issued under the above said provision and that it is erroneously mentioned and that the power is vested to issue a notification only in the State Government under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act. Further the State Government is entitled to call for the report from the District Collector and the notification issued on 26.09.2013 is for the purpose of compiling the information and submitting a report to the State Government to enable it to issue a notification under Section 22{Al(2l,of the Act. iO. In other words, learned Advocate General fairly submits that there is no notification issued as on today under Section 22(A)(21of the Act. It is further submitted that onty after receipt of report from the District Collector and after examining the same by tl e State Government, appropriate action as warranted by law more particularly under Section 22(A)(21 of the Act would be taken. 1 1. In view of the submission of learned Advocate General, it is made clear that notification dated 26.09.2013 is not a notification under Section 22(Al{.21 of the Act and since, as on today, there is no such notification issued under Section 22(Al(2) of the Act, there is no restraint on the registering authority to receive and process the deeds of conveyance concerning the lands in Survey Nos.79 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village.

12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of 33 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09.2013 in accordance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. However, it is open to the registering authority to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that mere registration of deed of conveyance does not confer title to the property and it is made clear that this order does not preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

54. This Court has taken note of the order of the learned Single Judge and the submissions made by learned Advocate General in the matter in W.P.No .19069 of 2014.

55. The notification that fell for consideration in W.P.No.19069 of 2014 and the notification in these writ petitions is pai materia, it is apparent that the notifications issued are on the same day by the office of the District Collector. Having perused the order of the learned Single Judge, this Court is of the view that the contention, that, ord.er in W.P.No.19069 of 2014, is applicable to the facts of the case is tenable and valid.

56. Be that as it ffiay, the learned Single Judge at Paragraph No.12 held as follows: 34 JAK,J W.P.No.++ZS of 2021 & batch "12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09-2013 in accordance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. However, it is open to the registering authonty to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that mere registration of deed of conveyance does not confer title to the property and it is made clear that this order does not preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

57. This Court is not inclined to take a different view frorrr what has been held in the order of learned Single Jud.ge at Paragraph No.12, tlrre same view is endorsed by this Court.

58. A Fult Bench of this Court in Viniannuri Raiagopala Chotry and others o. Principal Secretary, Revenue Dep'artment, Hgd.erabad. and otherss, dealt with respect to the entire gamut of Section 22-A of the Act. Further a Division Bench of this court in a batch of writ petitions, considered the validity of Section 22-A of the Act as incorporated in the Registration Act, 1908 vide A.R. Amr:ndment Act No.19 of 2OOT with effect from 20.06-2007 - I20l5 scc online Hyd 407 I 35 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch The validity of Section 22-A of the Act was upheld by the Division Bench in rnaectq. Technorogies privqte Limited and Others a. Government of Andhra prad.esh, Hgdera.bad and. others+. A combined reading of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this court and the Division bench and various orders in writ petitions, it is evident that any refusal for registering a property by an office of Sub- Registrar can be only in accordance with the Act and as per the law laid down by the Futl Bench. The notification issued in not in accordance with law.

59. In Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and others a. Principal Secretary, Reoenue Department, Ilgderabad. and others (3 supra), the Full Bench summarised the conclusions at Paragraph No.158 (in the form of points from I to XV), the relevant points in the present context are as follows: "158. We, thus, sumrnarize our conclusions and issue directions as follows : - (i) The authorities mentioned in the guidelines, which are obliged to prepare lists of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d), to be sent to the registering authorities under the provisions of Registration Act, 02023 scc online TS 4565 36 JAK'J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch ptoP.itY is classified' (ii) Insofar shall clearly indicate the relevant clause under which '""I"-Jt''"e (a) is concemed' the "^"t, indicate the concerned, District tofftttot" "t'"tt 't"o statute under which a transaction and its registration is of. the properties :"":::d orohibited. puttfrer il "tpltt ;rearlv indicate which orthe tui, ;;;;;ii ffi;;:il.l Governments own the ProPertY' (31 and (4) in the (iii) Insofar;"';;;;;phs clause (c) and (d) Guidelines, "outt''iitlp"tit-".* "nde-r' are concerned, il; L'irtotitits contemplated therein shall also forward'"to1t" t"gi"tering authorities' along th: with lists, the t"t"t"li" oi tegisierslgazette '7f property i" .o"t'J iv-"itt'"t t'Jo**tttt or wakf' and under -the provisions" of declarationsToroerl covered under clause (d)' Ceiling Acts if th" ;t;;;tis -i""at , (iv) " " v) No notification' contemplated by sub-section (21 of Section 22A' is necessary. with respect to the (a) to (d) of sub-section properties falling ""a"1 "t"t-t"tt it1 of Section 22-A' "ti'-"' llilr in" re gistering a]thoril:;s^T":L::i-":Tiii in refusing regist?ation & do""tnts in respect of the (a) to (dl of sub-section (1) properties "out'"ily";;;=;" l'tn"rttie s contemplated o f Sectio n 2'z -o ; ;'#;; under the g'iJeUne"' as aforementioned' have communicated th;i'i^;'or fioperties prohibited under ,3iiit;" concerned authorities' which are obliged to furnish tt e ti=-ts oi properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of suu-seclion'(ii of Section 22-L' and the concerned Registering Oflicers shall follow the guidelines scruPulouslY' . (ix) It i" tp"" #the parties-to a document' if the relevant prop"'l;)t;i'^H;"--.-place in the' list of properties .ou"tti'by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section zz-n,io ippiy ftt its'deletion from the list or ^t6 ttre concemed authorities as modification tttereoi' provided for in J# gtiii"rines' The-concerned authorities are obliged to tot'"iat' the request in proper neSne'clive and pass ,pptort"iit oid"' within six *eeks from the and make its copy date of .""tipt "oi1t'e available to the concerned Party' ttx.....xv-" "pptication l 37 - JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

60. It is submitted by learned counsel for official respondents that by letter dated 07.04.2025, office of District collector communicated a list of prohibited properties to the office of sub-Registrar(s) (through the office of IG) and authorities be granted liberty to initiate steps or act in the light of the new list dated o7.o4.2o25. Need.less to state that authorities are empowered under law and are not precluded to act within the frame work of law.

61. It is submitted that pursuant to interim directions documents presented were received, registered and released in the batch of writ petitions. In view of the submissions made, this court is of the opinion that no further orders are necessary as far aS registration of documents is concerned "qtta" the petitioners in the batch of writ petitions.

62. Having considered the entire factual matrix of the case, the order of the learned. single Judge, the law laid down by the Full Bench, the Division Bench of this Court and the Act, this Court is of the opinion that the order of respondent No.2 bearing No. 18183/G1 12019 dated 38 w.ii.No.++zs or 202t.'ffi{ , ,f on the alleged notification dated 17 /06I'2020 acting 26.O9.t>.o13 in File No.ES /4233 / 2OI3 seriling;ampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the Disrtrict colrector, confirming the order of the Third Responcent in Refusal No.76 of 2019 dated rg/rL/2org, acting .n the aleged letter bearing No.B/322/2oor, dated 08 / 09 /'2O 1 1, are set aside. 63' Be that as it may, Authorities are not precruded from taking steps as warranted by law, in respect of the prohibitr:d properties communicated uid"e letter dated 07'o4.2(t25, by office of District collector to the office(s) of Sub-Registrar(s) (through the oflice of IG). 64- Fo. reasons aforesaid, writ petitions are ailowed "qua" the writ petitioners,,,qua,,the prayers. No costs., Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shatl stand closed. Date: 06.tO.2O2S plp/vpt ANIL KUMAR JUI{ANTI, J t: s j :.i li, :l

1., ,:: ): : 1:| ? 't :i :, I : ,j