✦ High Court of India · 30 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,519 words

Acts & Sections

Thotla Srilatha, D/9, T wioo, nOO'"ts H No PedtaPalli, Telangana Karimnagar District) rirsi,ru'#"i**#'il,lft ilsf, dfll8f i"n:# ...PETITIONER AND 1

2. J, 4 5 b 7 rh e s tate of re I a ns a n a'.13i. lil it&,lii"ff : fn",T:t" U,,t[ "Sl?i![:fi lt: Revenue DePartment' t) Hyderabad -5OOo22' orrices comprex - Peddaparri' ;::r:;Il$ S't:f ?'3,..;"$::':L%1, ?f"'"' *:irr::l*r,"t+"",:,1€:liitTtq'AcquisitionUnit-SCCL'Godhavarikhani' The Revenue Divisional Officer' Manthani Division' Peddapalli District ,Telangana - 505184 orrice' Ramagiri Mandar' centinary U{i:n:g;,liBe'J.31u%"1'MRo Ull*i*i,*gi-:,8,s!ffi€i5n'ft i:$'fiif; #J:""tll'3rr?h"T'1 i$::f +'"':'"J:gf : u"",3il"l*,il3l?,Ys:33ilflg?lo3il";i,t:%?"Jjf 505212 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' Order or sr' Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the Respondent i i I I I I I I I I I t , --t-_, .e...*+r, ,/,/ ,/ No 4 about considering petitioner submitted reorescnr,r;^^ A^.^, ^. ^. with abnormat or sreat detay that viotatins ,n. nr:o':,t,r"J:il,:i::::Jrrr":r"i:ilI) in Telangana State Land Acquisition (Consent A Lump sum payment towards Rehabititation and R Lump-sum pack "r, Ijjl;,H:Hrlj:::J"J;r: and Sect on ro,.,n"'n*l#i:' [:d:[T:t::: .#]:::i;, :ff Acquisition' Rehabiritation and Resetrement Rures, 2013, against the Articre 300-4 of the constitution of rndia, against in the right of Judgment of the Division Bench of this Honble court in writ Appear No.677 of 2022 an(lagainst to the Mekala Pandu and others reportedas 2oo2 (s) ALD 2 matters of Land Acquisition is i'egar, arbitrary and in vioration of and consequenry direct the Respondent No 4 for considering petitioner for R and R package Amount as eligibre beneficiary horder being as affected famiry member aggrieved with not granting of R and Fr package amount rike other citizens who berongs to same village as affected fiamily member according to Notification by Government, The Andhra pradesh Ga;zette part-r Extraordinary pubrished by Authority with No..r B, Karimnagar' Dated '25-07-2013 by correcting or rectifying on updating names of petitioners of the list of eligible family members to be like as a benericiary or R and R package horcrer ;:J;;" r^'l::::l',t "T; :,ff : Ji:, ::: :H l:; R shr to Fa r com pensa, :T::'jT,j:.ffi Judiciar precedents made by Hon'bre Supreme court of rndia time to time otherwise petitioner vuill b respondents arb trary, ";JT.:j:.:;ffj;l'HT:;:::J :il:1ff :1,ff Articles of 14,21 and ,Articte 3004. IA NO: 10F 2025 Petition under Siection 151 CpC praying that in the ci in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court direct the Respondent No.4 to consider the submitted represe by the petitioner dated 24_6_2021 pertaining to R and R amount under Section 17 in Telangana State Land Acquisitio Voluntary Acquisition and Lump sum payment towards Resettlement) Rules, 21017 or Rand R Lump_sum package (Telangana Amendmerrt) Act, 20.16 and Section 30 of rcumstances stated may be pleased to ntation which made package payment n (Consent Award, Rehabilitation and under RFCTLARR the Right to Fair Acquisition, Rehabilitation he above writ Petition' and Pass ln Land disPosal of t TransParencY 2013, Pending ComPensation Resettlement Rules' Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI PONAMPELLI GounserrortheRespondentNo'1tu'it"P$i1l$Xtt"$ft'tit';h counsel for the Respondent No'6 & ?' lEll6sJl33lt'o REDDY' RAVI The Gourt made the following: ORDER 'I I i i I I l T H N' Ordcr ST t Pe tI on N .26 1 of 2025 o u 7 ENIV 40 i I f I I I " ... lrr tssrr. , tt'-. l'he \X rit Petition is filed seeking rhe followrng rehef: ,'iL, - \,r, ,,'i;,i,),;lil:l]:::: il*:,", mn,, r,, r,urr,, ,,n, I 1 . ,,r',,,r ,, .,r,,rrs p",;,;;;",;;X::i lf,_l'.,,"" ,,r ,r," R,.r"nu,,,, .^ , ,, ,,,'.",, ",.,,..11 j"1,. ,r,,, ,,"i,111 li rcl,,\(nr.,ro,, ,lrrrd 1i,,, 1,.,t urrl rn I' r.,rr, ,r " , ,, ,.^,n'i,"r"lLT',:.t111'':,' t',,,,'.,,,,,. ,,, .,.',," , anol-rirrJ,.umIrarmc,ttcrrvadsD,.,,"""'.\\\-l,rl\olu,],.rr.\,,trl\tu, an,i Rc.c,rl..,l.r.,,r R,.t,'.. . ,r . :. R . u * arn,f.r,'''" i])f^"1.,,,1,',,.n , $d#rffi#rffi$tr:iffiil ,r, to the Mekala l'andu .rnd oth.rs .r,,,,._ ,i tePoftedas ,oo, t orii JliiJ,sa8:r.nsr ;;".;; ,";r",Illl::,,::,.#^:T:';ll,"n ",rr" 1",;,:,: , ';.,1;:'l';,1 ; :1"]1"i1'Jr-:.n"un 'r: eLqr,c r'qr rri,,,, "i,-; ;:," ru\r ,,r,)(. ,,,.ur.,. \'o b.r,rnr.,"ill,,.::,911,,,r*"ri,n rir.,.^.,i. Iill ,,, c, or J nl,,',",,;.;, ;, ;,*"1 :;",;:l: ;;:.,i:,i,l,i i;,r::,,:l:, ]1,,,i',] i j;-1,'f".1;il]] ]l:11|t o, A-urhonr]. \rith No 18 Karim,r;rgar L)aaLr r,., .'. 1,.,1 I ;, ;;;l';:,;;i:;'ii'i:: ; i:,l].:, li,::;Iln"1,r;.";,",,' hotl, r r,,,,-d nq ru_lrovr\rons/surJ(u^.. ..,r,r-, ,._rii",i l', : i,_; ,,': I " . ( r,rnlens.r11,,n:nd Transparcncr in Lrncl _\cqursition _r.r, j0r,'rlrl i"a., ,l.1o: r,r H,,ni,le Supre,rrc (i,rrrt of rnctra trrnc t., ru,,c ,rri,e,.,,., ll:_::0;,,, pcirrrunrr \ I J,c f,ur rnro suffcr wrrh rr_rcpar:tLle arr"..^i- il., ' ,^] *,, rc'ponde.r. rrr,,rran legrl unconstr rrLrio.al ,.,i"".. ,"r..i. .."'..,,,i";;,,':, ,,,., .\rrr, l( . ,,t I . 'l anJ \ruL le 100 \_..,. Fleard l"Ir. Ponampelli Ravi, learned counsci for thc petttroner. lfr.. Somu Srinir.as Reddy, learnecl i\ssistanr 2 Gor.ernmenr Pleadcr for Lancl Acquisition appearing fcrr respor.rdenrs Ni..1 ro 5 and t\,Ir. p.S. Harsha Recicrr,- Ieatn.rl Standing Coutrsel tol Singar:eni Collieties Ootr-lpan-r' l'lmitecl (SCCf) aPP(lnr'':rrg for respoutierrts No'(r lncl 7' \ 1 \X/ith the coflsent of Iearnecl counsel for the Partics; writ Petiuon ts being disposed rlf at the st'age o[ adrrrisston

3. The brief facts purchased a PIot admeasulng o f the case are that rhe Petitloner 86 squarc 1'ards in Survey No.258 oF l'adnaP ur \ri[age, Ramagiri Mandal' Peddapalli Mutharam Mandal' I(arimnagar District) District (e rstwhiie and coostl-r-lcted a house aod orher strllctrlres thereon' rvhich was allotted House No'273 and since then' hc was residing in the said house' While so' responclenls No 1 to 5- authoriues acquired the said proPcrn along rvith certain "thcr [or the pur?ose of cxpansion of Open Cast Proiect-Il of Singareni Collietics Company Lirrrited and passed an award properties or26.09.2015.

4. Thc grievance o[ thc petitioner is that he was not cxtended the benefits of Rehabilitation and Resetdement (Tt&R) package. The Peuuonet submitted rePrcsefltatlofls a I I I I I I -Eq;gp' ,/' .,/ 3 beforc re ,.ponclent No. bencfits crf lt&R pack; consider:ed the representafion 24'06'2021seeking ro e'':tend thc tge. But, respondent No.4 has not anci the same ar-e pcnding. \r r_t'nr.ncJ counsel lor the pedrioncr submtrrt.rl tlrar rlris o.26910 of 2tt24, to examine tite (lourr, in ur sirilar writ peudon being W.p.N dtrected rhe R61,6nlle Dir,,isionai Officer representation submitted b1, the petitioner th ercin alons witlr the docutnen is annexed thereto and in the cven t the petifloner tircrr:in is found to be eligible for rhc benefits r>f R&R package, he shall take appropriare acrion tor pa\,rneor of cornpcnsatrcn in accordance with the provisions of itght t() Irair- Conipensauon and Transparency in l_ancl Acquisition, Rc.-r:rbilitation ancl Resettlement i\ct, 2013 (for brer.iq. 'Act 3(.r ol'2()13) and the pedtioner herein be gralrred the ver\, same rc lie L l I l 4 I-earned Assistant Gorrernrncn[ I]lcailer appcaring For 6. respondents No 1 to 5 'nnt1 lcantecl Standing Counsel appearing for responrlents No'6 and 7 jointly submit that respondent No 4 rt''il consiclcr the representation submitted arrd r''"'ill Pass approPrlate otder rn by the Pctitioner accordancc rvith law rvil.hin a reasonable dme as may be fixed by this Court 1 In r.iew oi the above' responclent No'4 is directed to consider the rcPtesentatron dated 24.06'2021' submitted bY thc petitioncr along with the documents' if any' annexecl rhereto in support of his claim and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance u'ith larv' after giving an tlpportuniry of personal heanng to the petiticncr' rvithin a perioci of eight (8) rveeks from th<: ciate o[receipt of a cop'i of this order' IF the petirionet is tound cligible fot thc beneftts of R&R package,, respCfrtetrt No 4 shall pa1' thc same as pcr thc provisions o[ 30 "f 2013' '\r--t ::5::

9. Sr-rbjcc:t ro the above directions, the Writ pctition is disposecl of. No cos ts. As a se,quel, miscellaneous pctitions, pending if an1,, stand closccl To, 1 //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REG ISTRAR SEJhN OFFICER i!*+H'.{*gr"i'"::",13y",'o.,,,"no:J:[,u#"t,T;;'!.1"o,d:"gill3"ll

2. The Pedd,'J:ill'J,"",lJf ?t#, J 3 li[,, pr" trict orrice s co m p rex - Peddapalli, ",fS'- 4 District, 4sf,'r:iiiBiJlY:+"",,'.';:lT Land Acquisition Unir- SCCL, Godhavarikhani, The Revenue Divisional I etangana _ 5051 g4 5. The Tahsildar, Tahsi Officer, Manthani Division, peddapalli cotony, eeaoli",ii.jirlr,$l%Jrl\rlRo office, Ramasiri Mandar, centinary 'iffi :Fi#:il%ifils;;i*,,#;ffi '',?:'J,,?",*",:r,rr j,"r1ir; ' L:*?!fl 8. One CC to SRt PONAI\4PELL| RAV|, Advocate tOpUCJ 9. One CC to SRt p.SRt HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL [OPUC] 10.fw.o CCs to Gp FOR Telangana ]i nlo"l-r"ur'otflUff o"n''tlrloN, High court ror the state of T3 i: ;,, tLft , #fi ;$fl s{" }: s."J,j"# : yi " Eg3 :, ":3it]x'# "lf, I n 1 1 . Two CD Copies BSR t i i l HIGH COURT DATED: 3OtOl]ZO2S cCTODAY 5: St ,{rs 1 o. -) nI J I r r ij-i ,;ii: -.:i,l , *^ a .:, il ;.,/ .,/ ORDER WP.No.26T1 of zOZs DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments