1. It/ohd. Khaleelulla v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF () L.' MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in granting No objection and permitting the respondents 6 and 7 in constructing the petrol bunk on the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 2-20 guntas in Sy.No. 54,1/AA and S42lE situated at Udithyal village, Balanagar Mandal. Mahabubnagar c istrict is illegal. arbitrary contrary to l;lw and violation of Articles, 3004 of the con:;titution of lndia and consequently drrect the respondents to cancel the NOC whir:h is granted to the respondents 6 :rnd 7 by stopping the construction of the pe,rol bunk in the above mentioned larrri. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circun.stances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High Court mal be pleased to direct the respondents 2lo 5 to stop the construction of fl-e petrol bunk constructed by the rr>spondents 6 and 7 on the petitioner land exlent of Ac.2-20 guntas in Sy.No. 542lAA and 5421E situated at Udithyal village, Balanagar lVlandal. Mahabubnirr;ar district by cancelling the NOC grant,rd by the 2nd respondent to the rr:spondents 6 and 7 pending disposal of the main Writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: '1 . Abdul Hameed, S/o Abdul Jabbar aged about 50 years, Rl/o Jdithyal village Balanaqar Mardal, Ivlahabubnagar district.

2. Abdul Salam, S/o Abdul. Jabbar aged about 45 years, Fl/o Jdithyal village balanagar l\4an Jal, Mahabubnagar district. ...VACATE PETITIONERS ..,PETITIONERS AND

1. Z. J.

6. Mohd. Khaleelr I a, S/o Mohd. Jahangeer Aged about 65 year. Mohd. Kareemtrlla, S/o Mohd. JahangeerAged 57 years, Mohd. Shafellulla, S/o Mohd. Jahangeer Aged 50 years, Mohd. Azmathr- Ila, S/o [\/ohd. Rahamathulla Aged 45 years, Abdul Wahab, [i,'o Ali Sab aged 75 year, Abdul Munaf, Str Abdul Wahab, aged 58 years, Rl Mahabubnagar d istrict, . to R6 are .are. Agriculturists, R/o Udithyal village Balanagar Mandal, 7

7. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

8. The District Collector, Mahabubnagar district, Mahabubnagar. 9. The Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal Balanagar, Mahabubnagar district. '10.The lndian Oil Corporation Limited Divisional Office, 9-1-83 and 84, Sarojinidevi Road S'ecunderabad-S00 003 rep. by its Deputy General Manager. 'l 1.The District Civil Supply Officer, lntegrated Collector Office, Mahabubnagar District, Mahabubnagar ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 7 t2l2O21 passed in l.A.NO.1 OF 2021 in W.P.No.3153 of 2O21 . lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Between: The lndian Sarojinidevi Manager. Oil Corporation Limited Road Secunderabad-500 Divisional 003 rep. Office, by its 9-1-83 and 84, Deputy General ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 4 5 t) 7 o o Mohd. Khaleelulla, S/o Mohd. Jahangeer Aged about 65 year. lr/ohd. Kareemulla, Sio Mohd. Jahangeer Aged 57 years, Mohd. Shafellulla, S/o Mohd. Jahangeer Age.d 50 years, lvlohd. Azmathulla, S/o Mohd. Rahamathulla Aged 45 years, Abdul Wahab, S/o Ali Sab aged 75 year, Abdul Munaf, S/o Abdul Wahab, aged 58 years, All petitioners are Agriculturists, Rl/o Udithyal village Balanagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar district. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Mahabubnagar district, Mahabubnagar. The Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal Balanagar, Mahabubnagar district' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to (' L( vacate the fnterim orier granted in WP. No. 3153 of 2021 daled " 7-02-2021 and dismiss the above r€ ferred writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KASU BAL REDDY 6.ror eneser.rrl Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES Coun5el for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR CIVIL SUppLIES Counsel for the Respondent No.6 & 7: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH ORDER: WRIT PETITION No.3153 oF 20.21

1. On O5.O2.2O25 when the matter was called, there was no representation and, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption .,For Dismissal". Even today also there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this Court has no option except to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution/default. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// sol- r. rlyesnee ASS STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI KASU BAL REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 2. One CC to SRI DOIVINIC FERNANDES, Advocate tOpUCI t3. One CC to SRI SWAROOP OOR|LLA, Advocate tOpUCl 4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] To,

6. Two CD Copies BSR GJP "1 HIGH COURT DATED: 2510212025 ORDER WP.No.3153 of 2021 -== lHE 5 7., o7 J o o tu, 21 APE iw } f,, DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT, WITHOUT COSTS