High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith ' the High Court may be ...RESPONDENTS i i I I I I i I I I pleased to issue .n appropriate Writ, Direction or Order m,lr-o l)articularly one tn the nature of Wr t ,1 l\,'iandamus. n interferrnrT are aboul To issLre ;1 rrr.if order or direction more particularly one he nature of Writ of Mandarlr rs declaring the action of the respondent Nc 3 and No. 4 in ,'rt,r the peaceful life and liberty of the petitionr,rs (as both FlRs ,r;rne offence) and registering the false a,d f:rbr cated cases and trying tr ir-(:'rit the petitioners in crime (FrR) No 04 at 2025, on the file of fi/latwada F',tlir;e Station (Warangal police Commissic,nerrrte ) and also in FIR No 35 0f 0n the fire of Bandraguda porice Statio.i F yderabad porice Co mm i:;s jon,,,rate) without following the due process of aw and without rssurng an) r'c,tice U/s 35 (3) of BNSS Act and mor,) l?rti, ularly directions of the '-lon'b e. Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs State ol Bihar is illegal arb t.a -,r u nco nstitutional and violation of Article 1t) and 21 of the India and also violation of the principles cf Natural Justice Constitu tic r r.,f highly "2r-t25 lo fc llow the directions and con.sequr,,rrtly direct the Respondent No 3 and 4 of the 'lon'b e, Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs S"ate of Bihar more particula.ly rtr-ect him to follow the provisions of 35(3) 01 tlNtjS Act Criminal procedure :::ie in 24 hours and NOT to harass the petj|o re no. .1 who is in USA as he i ar; nothing to do with the alleged crime

2. consequ':ntiai y' crub (second FrR of Bandraguda pS) ie. t.rR 3s or 2o2s with first Ff R ca 6f 2o2s (Matwada porice Station) in rher rnk,rrest of Justice and fair ptay stated in o: 10F2 o25 IA N To ing that in the circumstances the High Court may be Pleased olice Station) and Respondent No 4 ctions of the Hon'ble APex Court in articularly direct him to follow the Petition under Section 151 CPC pray affidavit filed in support of the petition ' ct the Respondent No 3 (Bandlaguda P (Matwada Police Station)' to follow the dire Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar more p provisions of 35(3)BNSS Act Criminal proced ure code in 24 hours counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R' VIJAY GOPAL " T Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER # THE HoN'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BIIASKAII ITEDDY wRIT IT ION NO .2 644 OF 2 o2s ORDE\; ^,., ,-y'ru The l,,r; t petition is fil:d seeking following relie t: "1r; is-. 1.1. a urtt order or nc1tn .t. i;;";f rlr!::ction,more particutnre ,,l ,(tp,.t t ,t Nos.3 and *"'1\:",-!"*,:ii'iiZ""!'r"X' ,l',!,i a:t :i , 1u ,f ,i.^'iJr;;:^j!,."t"*,i"g btto the ,rc,, t[J'n,\. lnd resisterino :::r:f L"rh'"F;;: ;:;,' ",;:',i"!'|.'[: , .,,"i'ri."p"irio,tle raLse and fabricat< rt ./t<es and ,1i..,",, ": v.|_,i""'7.li! "T;,gr),{r"",::,o1 .oz; o, in.nn N, ii of i;;;';:,i',r, f,':; LX',',"i)', ,',",'*te)r7,!"at-so Con.mt. ,",",ot.) "riiio.r, l^!,?ttf . THsclerabnd p, ri^c ,".,,,^!o"o1'n9 the due prt,c, ss )l !ou) ,.tthout "ry::frt,, o,i"i!,,i"1,. ,,,11,, , ,", ji (3t , r tt\ : :. ii" ,.nai,;i:t Apc." (\, t,t ;r Amesh Kuiar ,,;t, ,tt, qnr arbii.rar;1 ,rrconstitutional ona u._totion Ly ii"LJ" ii,,i,irr, r rt the r-on;- -LLtton of India ond also ,.19t"rL".iiii.'1r,i,1,1,,n, of Nqturut -tt,tttce and conseo.uenq dir;;l- i;'r;r"o:"ii *r, , and 4 t '' i,tlout tlte direcitons of the Hon,ble Ape.t (,o.tn tn A^me;,h ', na, Vs. State of Bihai i.r" i"*"t"ir)tir',,, ti^ tu J()uor 't e prousLons of 35 (3) o/ BAISS A t ( r,nrr al procedu,r r. :ode tn 24 hours and. NOf i h.c:rcL", tn. p"tf ,ror,., No.l Luit,: rs lrr [.IS,4 as he has nothing to do uLith thZ dlegecl olsequentiallg club (seconi FIR of Bandlaqu.'dct I,S) ?nme _?:1.' .< i.e., i'IF' itt. .35 of 2O2S u.tith /rrsr FIR O< oi ZOZi |.i,to'a ua, to. police St(Lttotl) in the interest of Justice and...'..." It is s;riLled that acting on the complaint lortge d by respondenl No. i. respondent No.4 registered a case il) Orime No.4 of 2025, lated O5.01.2025 for the offences purrisirable snL .i's;;:;L ,ci

2. .vs under Sections i4. 78, 79, 308 (2), 351 (2) of BNs, rvherei:r the petitioners trcrtrjn are arrayed as accused Nos'1 to 4 It is further stltej that respondent No'6 and petitionr:r I'[o'1 are 2 family friends and when petitioner No' 1 has threatened to marrJr respondent No'6, she lodged a complaint before respondent No.3 and acting on the same' a case in Crime No 35 of 2025 dated 25 01'2O25 was registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section s 77 ' 78' 79' 336 l4)' The grievance of the petitioners 1s 3sl (2) r/w 3(5) of BNS that, at the instance of respondent Nos 5 and 6' without following the due process of law' respondent Nos'3 atd 4 are frequently interfering with their life and liberty' and summoning them to the poiice station; and the said action on the part of respondent Nos 3 and 4 is illegal' arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice' t earned Assistant Government Pleader for Home 3. appearing for respondent Nos' 1 to 4 submitted that the petitioners here are arrayed as accused in Crime Nos'4 of 2O25 and 35 of 2025 before respondent Nos'3 and 4' therefore' for the purpose of preliminary enquiry into the said crimes' the respondents have summoned the petitioners to the police station. karned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home further submitted that if the presence of the petitioners is required for the pufpose of further investigation in the said 1 I : 1 I l ! i : : I i, i , cnmes. r f L,: respondents will issue notice to under S:: r:on 35 (3) of the BNSS Act. the petitioners 4 11 ,.6 1a' of the above submissions, this Cortrt, deems it apprcpri a I : to dispose of this writ petitio n rlirr :cting the respord< I r s;-police to issue notice to the , pr:titi:rn,:rs under Section ii;'- {3) of the BNSS Act and a,lso follorv rhe guideiines issuec tr' the Hon'ble supreme court in ARNESH B:UMAR v. STATE 0}. BITIARI, if thc presence of the: pr:ti-ioners is requirr:d l: ?ny case. 5 \Vi -]r r he above observations, this writ petitic,n is disposed of. No orc cr as to costs

6. As: sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if aly, 1 zotqq scc 273 //TRUE COPY// SD/-IVIOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTA.NI' REGISTRAR ro, Secrerarii t r r'ri.atabdd, Ay;;;;b';, i"J;;ij Xi) sooozz sECrdN OFFTCER 1. The Princ pal S _.cretary,. State of Telangana, D"pg(in"nt of Jo ne. Telanqana 2 l!1llql.rrta., Ciry police Commissioner, Commrssione. <f potice. O/o. rt Poorice' rower-A' tccc aliioins. R.;;i't i 'z 'eriji? ff#IB: ?";i, Fr"irir. Hyderabad .I

3. The Station H. .rs;e Officer, Bandlaguda police Station, Hyder.abad City police, . elangana S0b022 - Matwada porrce Station, \A/aransar porice 8:il,:lljli[ 5]!lEBuBX,."r,

5. One CC tc SF I lt VtJAy GOPAL .. T., Advocate tOpUCl t ti: Home' Hish court ror the state .r reransana at lff"r:S"l, 7. Two CD Copie s l:.+r ",. / IVIP GJP r, HIGH COURT DATEDT:3010112025 -:==:= HE.i-.q7 1 ( c) 21 trA( 2tr25 C .t * ()E.SpA a\ ii:==-:-1 + ORDER WP.No.2644 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS r' / €