The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fibd therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 porice in not providing protection to the petitioners from the hands of the respondents 5 to g who are accused in FrR No. g6t2o16 pending before the respondents 3 and 4, to enter into the petitioners into his agricultural lands of compartment No. 2060, Thimmampeta Block, cherupa[i Range of an extent of Ac.9.g2 cents ROFR patta in Sy No. 410, 396/19 cherupaili viilage, mangapeta lVrandar, Jayashankar District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of naturar justice and also violation of Articles 14,19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and con:;, 'quently direct the respondents police to provide protection to the petitioner frorr the hands of the respondents 5 to B. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:56570 oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circtrl lstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court n ay be pleased to direct the respondents 3rd and 4th police to provide protectic I to the petitioner from the hands of the accused in FIR No. 96/2016, pending dis rosal of the above writ petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(W PMP. NO: 9468 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circtt rstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rray be pleased o receive the additional material papers in the above WP.No. 4i;{ 13 of 2016 as per the list in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SARATH KUMAR.D (NOT PRE ;ENT) Respondent Nos.l TO 4: SRI R.LAXMIKANTII REDDY, Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 7: SRI M.V.DURGA PRI\I iAD Respondent Nos.6 & 8: - AGP FOR HOME: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT P TITIoN No. 4s913 0F 2076 ORDER This Writ Petition is iiled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: "...to issue a Writ Order or l)ircction morc particularlt one in thc natute of Writ of Mandamus declaring rhc action o[ the rcspondents 3 rnd 4 police in not providing protccti()D to thc pctittonets from the hands of thc respondents 5 io IJ u,ho arc ;rccusetl in F-IR No 96/2016 pending beforc the rcspondcnts 3 ancl 4 to entcr into thc petitionets into his agriculrural lands o[ ( -otttp;rrttnctt t \o 7060 Thimmampeta Block Cherupalli Range of an cxtcnt o[.\c 9 82 cents ROFR patta in Sy No 410 396/19 (-hcrupalli villagc rnangapeta Mandal Jayashankat District is illegal arbirran ancl asainst thc principles of natural justicc and also vurlation oi ,\tdclcs 74 19 27 and 300A of Constirution of India and consc.lucnth direct thc respondents police to provide pr<rtcctrott rtt tltc I)eutl(,1tcr from the hands of the tespondcnts 5 to 8 and to pass sttch othcr order ot otders as this Honble Court mal dcci.n tlt anci propcr irt rhc intcrcst of justice. . .."

2. None appeared on behalt oi rire pe iiriorrcr i. I have heard Mr. R. Laxr.nik';trrtir Rcclcir-, lcarned Assistant Government Pleader for Homc appcaring [c>r rcspondent Nos. 1 to 3, and the learned counsei apPcarirtg ftrr the unoffi.cial resPondents +. The learned Assistant Ciovcrnrncnr Pleader tirr Home' AS wcll as the learned counsel frrr rhc trrtoatlcial rcsP()11.lcnts, subft;t 2 that (.rimc No. 96 of 201(t rvas subsequentlv takcr :ognizance of as C.C. No. 245 of 2011 , and upon trial on irr, rirs, the case culminatcd in an order of acqruttai dated26.05.2()23 passed bv rhe Iearnc'd -\ddiuonal Judicial Magisuate of Frst Clas:,. I{rrlugu. lt is, thcre [rrrc, c()ntendcd that the cause raised in thc p cscnt perition longer surr ives for consideration. LearneC cr urrsei [<rr the urro filcial iesponclcnts has furtirer submitted ti-i t, rlurins t]re pcndenci, o[ the pctirion, the petitioner has unf<rrr rnalclv passcd a\\'aI

5. j hai e ircrtrscd the record.. (. ['irr 1,r rtr,ioiu:r's qricr.ance, as originallt- rais,.,: , o l:. ih.rr rirc i('5i)ol(i('rr l:,,licc ira:l iailec rc; pi.:r.ide plcrr(,.rr);l t-'.rlLr riri.. rrro t-t-ici:- L icsPonclcnts, who were anarved as accris :ci rrr rhe saicl CTLIIIC F{or'..r'r-er, l-raving resard to the subsetlucn dcr c[()plncrits clnrinq iirc pcr-rlcnr:r' oI this petition, namely that rlr ca]r.rrciar. case lrsclI has rr''cr-, clisl;,.rscC of bv ecouittal, this ( r Lr:.t r5 r,I r irt consiriclcci r ir'v' rhat n()thing fr-irther survives rn ii is I.,r'ririon tlrr ^-l 111() 'l _) 7 Accordingly, the petition stands dismisscd as having become infructuous. There shali be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c SECTION OFFICER J //TRUE COPY// To'" 1. On" CC to SRI SARATH KUMAR D- AdvgcaLe [OPUC] - i. i;; cc. t"-eiFoR HoME; Higrr court for the state of relangana' at a. 6il"c66'shr rtr.V.ouncn PRASAD, Advocate [oPUCl 4. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad. [OUT] PSK PVL HIGH COURT DATED:17 10912025 ORDER WP.No.45913 of 2016 r,i S14 <\c. o(J ? i JAtt 2M6 * r) i pr\T t.\\: :- '\ .$' * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ,)'l