Smt Gummadi Sudha Rani @ l\/uppavarapu Sudha Rani v. The State of Telangana

2. The District collector, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 3. The Tahsildar, Charla [\4andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 4. Smt. Avula Satyavathi, W/o. Lakshminarayana Reddy, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Gommugudem Village, Charla l\/andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

5. Smt. Vajrala Ramadevi, W/o- Bramahananda Reddy, Aged about 59 years, Occ. H6usewife, RJo. Gommugudem Village, Charla Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direclion more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent /Tahsildar, in not implementing the orders of the Honble Special Tribunal Case No.128 of 2021 , dt.19.06.2021 as confirmed by the Honbe High Court orders passed in WP.No.1B507 of 2O21 dt.16.08.2021, confirming the orders of the Revenue Tribunal to the extent of cancellation of the new Pattadar passbooks of respondent No.4 and 5 in accordance with law, in respect of the petitioners land in Sy.No.4212P to an extent of Ac.4- 20 gts of Tagada (Z) village, Charla [\,4andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, (in Sy.No.4212PlEE with Kata No.124 in the name of 4th respondent to an extent of Ac.2- 20 gts and in Sy.No.4212P/AA with Kata No.125 in the name of Sth respondent to an extent of Ac.2-00 gts), inspite of the Petitioners representation dt.06.1 1.2O21 is illegal, void and opposed to Articles 14,19,21 and 300 A of Constrtution of lndia. and consequently to direct the respondent No.3 to cancel the new pattadar passbooks issued favour of the respondent No.4 and 5 in respect of the petitioners land in Sy.No.42l2P to an extent of Ac.4- 20 gts of Tagada (Z) village, Charla [r/andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, (in Sy.No.4212PlEE with Kata No.124 in the name of 4th respondent to an extent of Ac.2-2O gts and in Sy.No.4212P/AA with Kata No.125 in the name of 5th respondent to an extent of Ac.2-00 gts) after giving notice to the respondent no.4 and 5. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to stop the Rythu Bandhu Scehme Benefit forthwith, in connection with the petitioners land 1n Sy.No.42l2P to an extent of Ac.4-2O. gts of Tagada (Z) village, Charla Nlandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, (in Sy.No.4212PlEE with Kata No.124 in the name of 4th respondent to an extent ot Ac.2-20 gts and in Sy.No.4212P/AA with Kata No.125 rn the name of Sth respondent to an extent of Ac.2-00 gts), since the special Tribunal orders in Special Tribunal Case No. 128 of 2021, dt.19.06.2021 has become final, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: OROER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.4241 of 2022 Date: O 1.t December 2O25 Between: Smt. Gummadi Sudha Rani (i Muppavarapu Sudha Rani The State of Telangana, Rep. b1, its Principal Secretarv, AND Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & four others. ... Petitioner ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Mummaneni Srir-rivasa Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistan t Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.I to 3. As per Lhe memo of proof of service filed by the petitioner, the notices sent to respondent Nos.4 and 5 returned with an endorsement as "Addressee has refused this article that's why returned to sender" and in view of the same, the notices sent to respondent Nos.4 and 5 are decmed service of notice. Perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that the petitioner liled the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.3-Tahsildar in not implementing the order dated 2

19.06.2021 passed b5. the Special Tribunal in Case No.l2g of 2021, as conllrmed by this court uide order dated 16 .oa .2021 in wp. No. 18507 ol 2021, confirming the orders of the Reve.rue Tribunal to the extent ol- cancellation of the ne*, Pattadar passbooks of responder-rt Nos.4 and 5 i. acc.rdance * ith lau. in respect or the petrtioner's ra,d in Sr.No.42/2P to an extent of Ac.4- 2O guntas of Tagacla (Z) Village, Charla Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District i.c., S5..No.42 l2plDlrr rvith Kl-rata No.124 to an cxtent of Ac.2 20 guntas in rhe name of respondent No.4 and Sy.No.a2/2p/AA with I(hata No.l25 to an extent of Ac.2-00 guntas in the name of respor-rder-rt No.5, despite the petrtioner's represenration dated 06.11.2021 , as ille gal a.cl arbitran..

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in spite of lapse of more than three and half years, thc respondent authorities have dot liled a counter der-rying the averments madc by the petitior-rer in the u.rit affidavit. Therefore, learned counsel requested this court to allo*' the writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities to implement the orders dated 19.06.202 1 passed by the Special rribunal in case No.Da/2021 and also the orders crated i6.08.202 1 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.p.No. laSOT of 2021.

4. On the other ha,d, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue did not dispute the orders dated 19.06.202 1 passed by the Special Tribunal in case No.l2gl2o2l and also the orders dated _ll 3

16.08.2021 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.1B5O7 of 2O2l and submits that the respondent authorities will consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Therefore, Iearned Asslstant GovernmenL Pleader requested to pa.ss appropriate orders. 5, In vierv of the submissions made on either side, tl-ris Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to implement the orders dated 19.06.202 1 passed by the Special Tribunal in Case No.l28l2O21 and also the orders dated 16.08.202 I passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.18507 of 202 1, ivithin a period ol eight (8) weeks from the date ol receipt of a cop-v of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner thereon. There shall be no order as to costs

6. Miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending in this Writ Petition, sha-ll stand closed //TRUE COPY// oT 'l . The Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department, ' Hyderabad, State of Telangana. S . K. BHAVANI S ISTANT R RAR SECTION OFFICER etariat at Hyderabad,

2. The District collector, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Koth agudem District 3. The Tahsildar, Charla l\/andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 4. One CC to SRI IUUMIVIANENI SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies (f BSR PVL HIGH COURT DATED: 0111212025 ORDER WP.No.4241 of 2022 l t I .2, Tr-rE s 2 J t,tR 2t)2i * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS LD?\e) 4H ffx a t\r\'ir