VINN Healthcare Private Limited v. Sahrudaya Health Care Private Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. One CC to Sri. P Pratap, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P. Kranti Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies l SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED: 20102|,2026 ORDER ARBAPPL.No.36 ot 2025 I ,/ I I L. :iL ,(} 2 B rEB 2u6…
Judgment
Cause title
Arbitration Application filed Under Section 11(6) the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying that in the circumstances stated in accompanying affidavit this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint an Arbitrator to.adjudicate the disputes that have arisen under Lease dated 18.08.2022 registered as 1g7T of 2022 between the Applicant and the respondent herein. Counsel for the Applicant : Sri. P Pratap counsel for the Respondent : Sri Krishna c v Grandhi representing Sri P. Kranti Kiran The Court made the following: ORDER ; I I I I rN rHE HIGH couRr FOR'tffiffirE oF TELANGANA THT]HON'I}LF] THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRT APARESH KTMAR SINGH ON No. DATED z 20.02.2026 Between: VINN l{ealthcare Private Limited AND Sahruciaya Health Care Private Limited
ORDER:
Applicant Respondents Sri P. Pratap, learned counsel appears for applirant. Sri Krishna C V Grandhi, learned Senior Counsel represents Sri P. Kranti Kiran, learned counsel for respondent.
The instant Arbitration Application was filed for appointment of an independent Arbitrator invoking clause 16 of tlre lease deed dated 18.08.2022 by the applicant under Sect:on 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \ \ (for short 'the Act').
The plea has been resisted by the learned Senior Counsel fe1 t.he respondent stating that the applicant has not invoked i i I l: :il ; t: I t I t, t: i I ! : iI i l, ,i {l 2 HCT GKTS' J) Arb. Appl. No.36 of 2025 Section 2L of the Act by any notice for appointment of an arbitrator. He is banking upon the notice issued by the respondent which contemplates mutual consultation under Clause 16.1 of the lease deed dated 18.08.2022 and which in fact was acted upon also.
Therefore, after some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Arbitration Application with liberty to the applicant to invoke the arbitration clause by notice to the respondent for seeking appointment of an arbitrator in respect of the instant dispute between the parties.
Operative part
Permission is allowed and the instant Arbitration Application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. VIJAYA BHASKER JOINT REGISTRAR . 6 / To, N,
One CC to Sri. P Pratap, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P. Kranti Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies l SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED: 20102|,2026 ORDER ARBAPPL.No.36 ot 2025 I ,/ I I L. :iL ,(} 2 B rEB 2u6 ; # ARBITRATIOI\I APPLICATION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.