The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Through WPS, North Zone, Hyderabad Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RespondenUComplainant in CRLP and lA.Nos.2 &3 of 2025 Smt Nazleen, Wo Mohd Waseem Ahmed, Aged about 29 yrs, Occ: Household, R/o H.No. 11-1-7761121A, Beside Joseph School Chilkalguda, Secunderabad. ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant in CRLP and lA.Nos.2 &3 ot 2025 Petition under Section 528 o'f BNSS Act, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Ntlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C. No. 7596 of 2020 against the petitioners/A-1 and A-4 pending on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS Act, 2023 prayt'g that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimin:,1 Petition, the High Court may be pl,:ased to permit the Petitioner to file the Comp omise Petition in view of the Compromise between the parties in connection witt the C.C. No. 7596 of 2020 pendin,T on the file of XV Additional Chief t\rletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, for the offences Uisec 498(4), R/w 34 of IPC and Sec ] and 4 of D.p Act, in the interest of ju,stice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) R/w 528 of BNSS Act,2023 praying that in the circurnstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimin,rl petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the petitioner to compromrsr r for quashing the criminal case ar]ainst Respondent No. l and 4 herein and quash the proceedrngs against ll^e respondents No. '1 and 4 / accused No.1 and 4 in C.C. No. 7596 of 2024 pending on the file of XV Additional Chie. Ivletropolitan Magistrate, HyderabarJ This Petition ctming on for hearing, upon perusing the M<.morandum of Grounds of Criminal I)etition and upon hearing the arguments of S ri [Vlohammed Afzal Pasha, Advocatr: for the Petitioners and the Additional public f,rosecutor on behalf of the Responclent No.1 and of Sri S Mohd Abdul Kareem Kran, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the f rllowing: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.1716 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 4 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.7596 of 2000 on the file of XV Additional Chief t\/etropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 49BA r/w 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Crlminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound I { the offences.

3. Vide order daled 07.02.2025, this Court direct6d the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Cou( for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification' and to submit a report. 2

4. Purstrant to the above said direction issued by .his Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High C )urt Legal Services Committee, has identified the pa(ies and sL bmitted a report, dateri 11 02.2025 and the same is placed orr record.

5. ln vie,r,, of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 lnd 4 in C C.No.759(i of 2000 on the fite of XV Additiorral Chief lVletropolitan lVlagistrate, Hyderabad, are hereby quasherl. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sh all stand closed \ To, //TRUE COPY// ASSISJA ', \ \ r \.J ]SE Srl/- K. AMMAJI NI REGISTRAR ClION OFFICER 'l . The XV Additio ral Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad 2. The Station Horrse Officer, WPS North Zone Police Station, Hytlerabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of -'elangana at Hyderabad [OU1']

4. The High court Legal Services Committee, High Court foi the S ate of Telangana at H Yderabad

5. One CC to Sri ltlohammed Afzal Pasha, Advocate IOPUCI 6. One CC to Sri {) Mohd Abdul Kareem Khan, Advocate [OPUCI 7. Two CD Copies ADK a Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise .a ':'-.*r*r:i!.t6.{rt\*ta:i,1. _ t::l : X ,.&, HIGH COURT DATED:17102i2025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1716 of 2025 i .:- i'., .,.J 1' .l:t t' 2 o 2 I APf 2025 *, t-)fgp7,'' l-;\ :a';r- ALLOWING THE CRLP AND IA.NOs.2 & 3 OF 2025 0 0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD i FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA I.A No: of ?OZ5 In L.P.No. of 2025 Between:- 1). Mohimmed Waseem Ahmed S1o Mohammed Khader Ahmed Age: 30 YEARS, Occ ; private employee, Vo H.No. Lt-7-776/12/A, Beside Joseph School Chilkalguda, Secunderabad. 2). Saiqa Begum W/o Mohammed Farhad Ali Shah, S Aged about : 33 years, Occ : Household R/o H.No. lL-l-776/tZlA, Beside Joseph School Chilkalguda, Secunderabad 4 1). The State of Telangana, Through WPS, North Zone, Hyderabad Represented by its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hycierabad Petitioners/Accused No. 1 AND 4. AND ... - Respondent / Complainant 2). Smt Nazleen W/o Mohd Waseem Ahmed Aged about 29 yrs Years,. Occ: Household, R/o H.No. 17-l-776ltz/A, Beside Joseph School Chilkalguda, Secunderabad ... Respondent/Defacto-Complainant MEMORANDUM OF JOINT COMPR OMISE.M EMO FILE D BYTH E PARTIES Contd...P/2 I il2il 1. It is submitted tnat, this quash petition is fired praying this Hon,:re court to. quash the CC No. 759(i of 2020 against the petitioners / A-1 and A-4 per ding on the file of Hon'bre XV Aririitionar chief Metroporitan rvragistrate/ Hycrerab rd in which Petitioners names are shown as accused No.1 & 4, First petitioner and respondent No.2 were married on OS-02-ZOI7 at Hyclerabad, The .arriuge rvas i n arranged marriage and the marriage was consummated and 1 chirdren were borr out of the wedlock

2. Whereas the fitarriage, due to some mis_understand ing disp rtes arose between the petitioner I'Jo.1 / A-1 and Respondent No. 2 herein and nrw both of them decided to Iive ha;pily considering thr: future of their 1 childrer .

3.) The respondent No ;l has filed a crinrinal complaint bearing F.I.R. No. 24 of 2020 dated: or-03-zo2r, the said FIR is registered for the offences punish:bre under section. 498(4), 406, 4t4 of IpC & sec 4 & 6 of D.p Act, and after r:ompreting investigation charge sht:r:t was filed against all the petitioners/A_1 and.\_2 herein and numbered as C.C. No. 7596 of 2,020 and cognizance was takr n for the offence punishable U/se: a9B(A), R/w 34 of IpC & Sec 3 & 4 of D.p by tl e Hon,ble XV Additionar chief rvletr,poritan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitior ers/A_1 and A-4. 4' That the petition:rs submit that as the disputes that arose betrveen the petitioners and the respondent No. 2 is resolved, respondent No.2 doesn,t !/ant to C rntd...P/3 j I I l I ,<'.& lt3tl continue the criminal proceedings as such.the present quash petition is filed by the p6rties praying this Hon'ble court to quash the cc No. rsg6 of2020 pending on the file of Hon'ble XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. It is submitted that, in view of the dbove submissions this Hon,bre Court may be pleased to quash the c.c. No. 7596 of 2020 pending on the fire of Hon,bre XV Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, for which the respondent No.2 has no objection. Date: -07-2025.' Place: Hyderabad CounsW" petitioners l Petitioner No.1 /A-1 l,*- Petitioner No.1 /A-4 N^1}4 Respondent No.2/

4. Defacto complainant Counsel r spondent No.2