ir,1flf.{1,95i,"fri:""Y,."#ilil:iu,*ft1;Bii v. Chairtr

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstance,s stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.'1 to 3 in not implenrenting the provisions of The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulatirrn of Street Vending) AcL,2014 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the procedur-. laid down under the said Act, for a consequential direction to the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to implement the provisions of the said Act and not to harass the Pr.'titioners by imposing fine, eviction, confiscation of goods etc., l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 23976 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit 'iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Rer;pondent Nos.4 to 7 not to harass the Petitioners herein by imposing fine, eviction, confiscation of goods etc., in violation of Section 3(3) of The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014", pending disposal of the Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 1OF 2O17(WPMP. NO:18570OF20171 Between:

1. S. Anu Radha, Wo. Venkateshwara Rao, Occ: Street Vending R/o. 9017lbl169, Madhapur, Patrika Nagar, Serilingampally

2. D. Saikumari, Wo. D. Babji, Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.2-14, ljjath Nagar, Kondap ur 3;"f;ii?llllf,;*Y:;,$i,,1J,"s, Nagar, Gachibowli, R.R. Dishici - . occ: Street vendins R/o.e51, sidiq Nagar, 4. Midambose, S/o. Bicas^Bose, Occ: Street Vending Rlo.2_6212t114, lndra 5. T. Chennakesavulu. Wo.. T. Kris_hnaiah, Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.B_7, HtG, ApHB cotony, Gachibowri, siiiirinJiripairv"'" 6. B. Vishnu, S/o. Janoaiah, _Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.4_316, Rajendra Nagar, Kokapet CBIT: R-R. oiiiiici' --' 7.Yle:^Flhiyaz, S/o. M.{. Riyaz, Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.14_1_ - 8. G. Srinivas. S/o. Duroa Rao, Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.1_106, HS Darga, 9. Golla Rangamma. Wo. Venkateswara Rao, Occ: Street Vending R/o. 10.T. Ratnamma, Wo- T. K.rislnaiah, Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.B-7, HlG, 'l 1.A. Subba Lakshmi. Wo. Subba_R?ju, Occ: Skeet Vending R/o. plot No.429, 129t29t344, Borabanda, ttew Atta-iur- Seritingampaily, nn DtstriCf ' H.No.282, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowti- - '--' * APHB Cotony, Gachibowti, n.n. biitrtct Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, n.n. diiiriit - '"-"' - --"-"'v "

12.P. Sailu, S/0. P. Narshimlu.,.Occ: Street Vending R/o. H.No.1-90/B/D/8, Vittal 13.K. Sarashwathi. Wo. K.:pile.ep, Occ: Street Vending R/o. p.No.1529, Sidiq Rao Nagar, Madhapur, seriiingamfJtiy 'vrrvrrrY I Nagar, Gachibowli, R.R. Distric[' ...PETlTIONERS

1. State of Telanqana. Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad AND

2. State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hydeiabad 'il1l,?"?j,1"'l3l%1ff ,T3f;ry.,g,:;[";fl ?'.::::., j?,]d3,iftffi i,;x'gg*", 'I13,3',i,.!",1j.+3i1it,xXyfiJ3'3fi l,,ifl r":fl i,:IFi;*o[,lif ?i]mssionerand 5. Commissioner of police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 6. Additional Commissionej of police (Traffic), Hyderabad and Member Town Vending Potice Control Room, HydirabiA:' ''-- -

7. The Station House Officer, Madhapur Traffic police Station Madhapur, Cyberabad, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

8. Telangana State lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd Basheerbagh, Hvderabad' Rep bv its':rg$giffiE'fri;;;;;r, RES'.NDENT No.B Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Respondent/ proposed Respondent No. 8 as Respondent No. g to the present rarrit petition along with all its miscellaneous petitions in the interest of justce. counsel for the Petitioner: sRl K.LAKSHMAN (Not present) counsel for tlhe Respondent No.l: GP FoR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT counsel for tl're Respondent No.3: Gp FoR MpcL ADMN & URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondents Nos.2, s, 6 & 7: Gp FoR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SC FOR GHMC Counsel for ttre Respondent No.g: SC FOR TSIICL The Court trarde the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICEVAIIITT RAMAI(RISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18532 of 2O15 ORDER: This petition is of the year 2015' On 24'lO'2O25 and 25.10.2025, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of ttre petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ,For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called' there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner' It seems that the petitioner is not having any inclination to prosecute this case' 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to costs'

3. Pending miscellaneous applications' if any in this petition, shall stan-d PloSed. SDI-A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIST ,/TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER r To,

1. One CC to SRI K.LAKSHMAN, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] 3. one CC to SC FOR TSIICL [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

5. Two CCs to GP FOR MPCL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State ofTelangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . IOUTI 7 PMK Ere Two CD Copies R.{,,- HIGH COURT DATED:.li111012025 ORDER WP.No.18532 of 2015 lttE s 1 6 ,{Af 212$ * 7 * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/DEFAU LT WITHOUT COSTS c4.9 (9