High Court · 2025

Petition unde' section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed in s;upport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to lssue lnterim Directions <lirecting Declaring the inaction of Respondent no.2 in not considering the rep resentation of the petitioners dt. 2111 1 12a24 and also the inaction of Responrient nos.3 and 4 in not considering the representation of petitioners dt. 2411112024 received vide rlomplaint lD EM/071 9/MEDM(H N/DAy002 t31 4312024 as contrary to taw, arbrtrary, untenable and unjust and consequenfly to direct the respondent nos,2 and 4 to forthwith initiate action agains;t the unauthorized construction being raised by respondent no. 5 in property, of petitioner no.1 admeasuring Ac. 1 .1 6 rSts in sy. No. lZ2laalaluu, Ac.0.1(i667 gts in sy. No. 1 1gluu/ee totailing Ac. .1 .26213 gts and property of petition':r no.2 in rand admeasuring Ac.0.0333 gts in sy No. .r 18/uu/u and Ac 0.10 gts in sv. No. lz2laalatru totailing Ac.0.131/a gts., combinedry totaily acmeasuring Ac.2.0[r gts in sy. No. 1 1B/uu/ee, '1 1g/uu/u, sy. No 1 22raararru, sy_ No sy. No. 122raa,'aruu at Doorpafly viflage, eutbularur Mandar, rv4edchar - Malka.jgiri District and be pleased to pass such other orders as this Honble directing Respondr:nt no. s to stop unauthorised construction in property admeasuring property of petitioner no.1 admeasuring Ac.1 .l O gts in sy. No. I 22laalaluu, Ac.o.16667 gts in sy. No. 1 1B/uu/ee totailing Ac. 1 262,3 gts and property of petitionerr no.2 in rand admeasuring Ac.0.0333 gts in sy. No. rt g/uu/u and Ac.o. 10 gts in s;y. No. l22raararru totafling Ac.0.i31/3gts., combinedry totaily admeasuring Ac.2.00 gts in sy. No. 1.18/uu/ee, jlgluulu, sy. No. .l 22laalalru, sy. No. l22laalaruu at Doorpaily viilage, Qutbuilapur Mandar, rr,,4edchar IVarkalgiri District. lA NO: 2 OF 202s Petition under :lection 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to rssue lnterim Directions directing Respondent no. 5 to stop unauthorised construction in property admeasuring property of petitioner no.i admeasuring Ac:. 1.10 gts in sy. No l22raararuu, Ac.c 16667 gts in sy. No. 118/uu/ee totaring Ac. .r 26 2/3 gts and :.:7 property of petitioner no.2 in land admeasuring Ac.0.0333 gts in sy. No. 118/uu/u and 4c.0.10 gts in sy. No. l22laalalru totalling Ac.0.'l 3'l13 gts., combinedly totally admeasuring Ac.2.00 gts in sy. No. '1 18/uu/ee,118luulu, sy. No. l22iaalalru, sy. No. l22laalaluu at Doolpally village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Medzhal - Malkajgiri District. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY The Court Delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'B];E THE ACTING CHIEF WSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE; HON'BIE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.1l5 of 2o25 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog' ,Daul): Sri Vivel< Jain, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for \ \ Municipalities, f,rr respondent No.2.

2. With the ,3r)ns€nt, finally heard.

3. Learned r:ounsel for the appellants submr.ts that the appeilants int,:nd to file a more specific and comprehensive representation for the present grievance before respondent No.2 and said authority may be directed to decide the same in accordance with law, without getting influenced by the order of learned Single Judge

4. Learned ljt-anding Counsel for Municipalities, for respondent No.2, has no obj ection

5. Accordingl'r, this Writ Appeal is disposed of Lry reserving liberty to the a.ppellants to file such comprehensive representation before respond,:nt No.2. In turn, respondent No.2 shall decide the same in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed aLrr1, opinion on the merits of the case. No costs. 2 Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. //TRUE COPY' SDI B. SAryAVATHI D P TY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal.Administration and Urban Development' Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyoeraoao'

2. The Commissioner, Kompally Municipality' Village Main Road' Kompglly' ' D;;ff;i Giniirai'"sr*irtrino jt, Meocnlat - Ma-lkajgiri District -5001 00 g. ihe Chairman, State Level TS-bPASS Committee' Princioal Secretary' m plex' o pp' PT I trilunicipal Administration a-nO [r.Oan beuetopment' Office bt sth Floor' ENC o b'"' pu i xisn a n i B u rl{i ns i"P"H i"B'rltffi , rrlX" ^co tir'jii6rs, Ad-Guirds, Masab tdnk' Hvderabad - 500004' "o-u 4 The Chairman, District Level TS-bPASS qgrytiltge' District-Collector' - rri;;ri;t'rM;ikris'nioi.trictlsirr rtoor, rr'lclPH)Buildins, MAandUD.. U;ffi, rlsiiil", ariidl;;b;bi;i' opp Prr Buirdrns'hc Guards' Masab tank,' HYderabad - 500004' -S-lqnMarket'

5. The tvlanaging Director, Alpine Ventures' Offlce at Ad1 " ililii;:Al;-liaaon onilrapiallv, Kompallv, Hvderabad - 500100 6. One CC to Sri Vivek Jain, Advocate [OPUC] 7 one CC to SRl. P.KRISHNA REDDY, Standing Counsel, High Court For The 8. Two ccs to GP for Municipal Administratio^n UI-ban Development' High court " r";ih; si;t" o1 T"ianguna,'at Hyderabad [oUT] 9. Two CD CoPies State of Telangana. [OPUC] TJ GJP / HIGH COURT DATED:3 0t0112025 JUDGMENT WA.No.115 of 2025 (t HE SI4rc' (' t ll 5 t'lAfi 2[25 i.) \t-!i. 'a. ? i i \'( ti r-C '. --i.-.._..- -- (" ( ::, -: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS /,1 /t ,/? / ,4>