Anjani Priyanka Naru v. Naru. Anli Reddy
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.JAGAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MD. FAIZUDDIN SIDDIQUI Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'T ILANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KI RTHIK WRIT PE-TITIONNo .2595 0F 20i6 29th JANUARY,2026. Between: Anjani Priyanka Naru and 2 others. AND Petitioners The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principai Secretar5z, Revenue Department (Stamps & Registration), T.G. Secretariat, H-vderabad ald 3 olhers. ORDER: Respondents With the consent of both the parties, this Vr it Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itseil
#2. This Writ petition is hled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the follon.ing reliel: "-..to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more partrcL in the naturc of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the :it t Respondent in w.ithholding the petitionJrs, Szl Documents registered on 2a-O6.2O25 as dis-criminatory, illegal and consequently, direct 4rh Rl to forthwith release Sa_le Deeds Documents registerec the Petitioners vide Registration No. 143 (P95/2O25), p96 /2025 & pg7 /2025 etc., in resptr lalded properties purchased by them in Sy.Nos.! situated at Varshnavi Nagar of Gajulara:iraran Quthbullapur Mandal, Medcha_l Malkajgin District, i all other consequential benefits...,, . 1 iarl_.r' one on of 4th Deeds rbitrary, pondent n favour ;8l2O2s : of the l&32 Village, nd with ,
#3. Heard Mr.V.Jagapathi, learned counsel representing Mr. Mohd. F. Siddique, learned counscl for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Stamps ald Registration for the respondent:.
#4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 purchased a residential plot bearing plot No.35, admeasuring 292 sq. yards (equiva-lent to 244.11 sq. meters), through a Sale Deed executed in her favour by one Ginju Uj rvala Reddy. Similariy, petitioner No.2 purchased commercial property bearing Plot Nos.C2 and C 1, totalling
166.66 sq. yards, from one Ginju Vemana Reddy, and petitioner No.3 purchased commercial property bearing plot Nos.C3 and C2, totalling 166.66 sq. yards, from Ginju Vemana Reddy on 28.06.2025. All the aforesaid properties are situated in Sy.Nos.2O and 32, Vaishnavi Nagar, Gajularamaram Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. After completion of all pre-registration forma-lities, all the three Sale Deeds were submitted to respondent No.4 for registration. Respondent No.4, being satished with the formalities, intimated the petitioners as well as their vendors regarding the slot booking timing for I t. J registration of the sale deed documents Acc t rdingly' on 28.06.2025, the petitroners' lheir vendors and 1l c u'itnesses appeared before respondent No'4 as per the s: reduled slot and all three Sale Deeds lvere registered on the '': 66 fl6y lvith registratlon numbers assigned Hor.r'ever, desPit : registratlon' theSaleDeedshavenotyetbeenreleasedbyrel;,ondentNo.4 Therefore, learned couns'r I prays this to the Petitloners' Court to direct resPondent No'4 to forthwitlL release Sale Deeds registered in favour of the petitioners uitl ' Regisration Nos.14358/2 025 (Pssl2O2s\' Pg6l2025 & t )712025' all d,ated 28.06.2025 ng for the l1 release the rondent No.3.
#5. Learned Government Pleader appear respondents submits that respondent No 4 'r documents if no obj ections are raised by re s Hor'vever, in the event of any objection' t: withholding the documents r'r'ill be duh' communicated to the Petitioners' 6. Having regard to the submissions m z de by iearned counsei for the respective pa-rties' this J rit Petition ts disposed of rvith a direction to respondent I'l r '4 to forthrvith : reasons for recorded and I r-- B I ; I t I release the Sa-1e Deeds registered in favour of the petitioners uide Registration Nos. 1 4358 1 2025 (P95 1 2025), P96 1 2025 and P97 12025, all dated 28.06.2025. In the event if respondent No.3 is having al'"' objections for withholding the said documents, the reasons for the same shall be assigned 1n lvriting and communicate the same to the petitioners. The entire exercise shall be completed, AS expeditiously AS possible, preferably r,r,ithin four (4) ',r,eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order Miscellaneous petitions, if an1', pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- C.DEEPI ASSISTANT REGI R SECTION OFFICER m s and Registration), TG The Principal Secretary, Revenue De partment ( Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad The lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, Market Road, Hyderabad I-he- Dlslrlct Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department, Medchal- IValkajgiri District at lVledchat. The Sub-Registrar, Quthbullapur SRO, Quthbullapur, tr/edchal-Malkajgiri District, Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI MD FAIZUDDIN SlDDtQUt, Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies gistration Bhavan, MJ \ To
#1. 2
#6. 7. SA TKS HIGH COURT DATED:2910112026 ORDER WP.No.2595 of 2026 toI HEs \-- 14r):.1 Ll^ {) ,1 lJ'+ '..: + \: I 2 .P fl:F 2rt1,.; ,,t,]-a-;H * DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. Ir{ a ,n
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 29 Jan 2026. The bench was PULLA KARTHIK.