Pushpa Bai v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not implementing the common Judgment and Decree dated 19/06/2024 in o.s. No. 171 of 2008 and o.s. No. 74O of 2O1g passed by the Honourable Xl Addl. District and sessions Judge-cum-Xl Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge at L.B.Nagar as illegal, arbitrary, violative of provisions of the Telangana Stamps and Registrations Act, violative of Articles 14 and 300,4 of the Constitution of lndia' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to implement the common Judgment and Decree dated 1910612024 in o.s. No 171 of 2oo} and o.S. No. 740 of 2019 passed by the Honourable xl Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-Xl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at L.B.Nagar. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.SURYA SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATTON The Gourt made the following: ORDER 7 THE HONOURABLE SI{I IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR t' ORDER: IATRIT PETITION No.2553 of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for stamps and Rcgistrations appearing for respondent Nos-1 to 4. with their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 2 This writ petition has been filed seeking ttre fo owing prayer:- "to declare tlrc nction of rc respondents in not implementing the contmon ludgment and Decree dnted 19.06.2024 in O.S No.171 of 200g and O.S No.740 of 2019 passed hy tfu Honourable Xl Adtll. District nnd Sessions ludge-cunt-Xl Ar)ditionnl Mctropolitnn Sessiorts lutlge nt L.B Nngar as illegal, arbitrnry, ttiolntiue of protisions of the TeLangana Stamps and Registrations Act, t,iolntitte of Articles 14 and 300A;f the Conslitu lrcn of lndin."

3. Brief facts of this writ petition are that the petitioner had filed O.S.Nos.171 of 2008 and 740 of 2079 on the file of the XI Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-Xl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at L.B Nagar (hereinafter referred as Trial Court) anrl the Trial Court tide corrunon Judgment ciated 19.06.2024 in O.S Nos.171 of 2008 anil 740 of 2019 passed rhe following order:- "(1) OS No.171/2008 is fucreed ruitlt cost declaring the plaintiff as absolute oruner of tlte suil scltedtrle P/ol Nos..l8 nntl 39 ndmeasuring i000 Sq.ynrds in Sy.No.105 (Pnrt) sitrtntcd nt Puppnlngudn Village, Rnjendrnnngar Mnndnl, Rnngn Retldry l)istrict by t'irtue of Registererl sile dae d Doc.No.1863/1999. Dated:1't .05.-1999 nnd to cancel tlrc Registeretl I I i 2 sale deed Doc No.5290/2.006, dnted: 06-04-2006 exeated by defendant No.1 in fnuour of defendant No.2. (2) OS.No.740/'10'19 is also decreed ruith cost declnring the cancellation of snle deed, dated 24.03.2006 uide Doc.No.1309/2006 registered in tlrc ffice of the Sub-Registrar, Ra.iendratmgar ns null nttl ttoid and tlu defendants, their agents, men and serl,ants etc., Ltre restrained from interfering zoitlt thz possession of tlrc plaintiff ot'er tlu suit schedub property."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thr: petitiorrcr t)ll

29.08.2024 and 23.1,1.2024 made representations and requested respontlent authorities to take note of the common Judgment dated 19.06.2024 passcd in O.S Nos.171 of 2008 and 740 of 201,9 and update the revenue recortls in respect of the subject property and further submits that the same is still pending for consideration and pray this Court to direct the respondcnt authorities to clispose the petitioner's representations tlatc-ci 29.08.202.1 a r-rcl

23.11,.2024, in a tirne bound period

5. Learneci Assistant Government Pleader appearing ior rcsponclents submits that no instructions are forthcoming from the respondcnt authority and further submits that if the petitioner representations clated 29.08.2024 and

23.7'1.2024 are still pending for consideration; the respondcnt authorities rnay be directecl to dispose of the said representations and pass appropriatr. orders in accordance with Iaw

6. In view of thc submission made by learned counsel appcaring on either side and without expressing any opinion on the rnerits of the case, this writ J I petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to dispose the petitioner's rePresentations dated 29'08 2024 and 23 JJ2024 and pass appropriate orders skictly in accordance with law' as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner'

7. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of' Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed No order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// SD/. T.TIRUMALA DEVI REGISTRAR ASSISTA SE ION OFFICER o, 1 . The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Stamps and Registration Department, at HYderabad.

2. The Commissioner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps' 5-3- - 9;'5. Ni;;r-sjiuhi no., H,roTarn;ini vtu'ket, Herza^Estate' Risala Abdullah Colony, Jam Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana 5uuu95

3. The District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department Ranga Reddy " e"it6irision, p"risnahtn iriilii' ton Kukatpdllv, Kukatpallv' Hvderabad' Telangana 500072.

4. The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office Rajendernagar' H.No. 1:8-184' NIRD - il - i,r*it'ii.n"'cotonv,-Haleno ranagar Mandal' Hvderabad' Telangana 5. One CC to SRI T.SURYA SATISH, Advocate' [OPUC] 6.TwoCCstoGPFoRSTAMPSANDREGISTRAT|oN'HighCourtforthe State of Telangana. [OUT] 7 Two CD CoPies. BSK HIGH COURT DATED:31 10112025 ORDER WP.No.2553 of 2025 !!!!p"' siEH f,l: 05 r;,: i-' O LTJ7 t, * *' ',''-A DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0