Bindge Sainath v. Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C V BHASKAR REDDY
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn by granting liberty as prayed for' No costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous Petitions Pending, if anY, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/, SD/- L. LAKSH ASSIST ANT BABU STRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 One CC…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more so, a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, by declaring the inaction of the respondents, in not considering the representation of the petitioner on 28. 11. 2022, for cancellation of the Pattadar passbooks issued to the unofficial respondents namely, Bindge Durpathi Bai, Wo Balaji, Bindge Parvathi Bai, W/o Laxman, Bindge Madhav, S/o Bhujanga, by correcting the mistakes as per RSR in respect of the lands in Sy. No l 85 at Jawla B village. of total extent of Ac. 1. 37 guntas as arbitrary, illegal' and contrary to law and consequentially, to direct the respondents to cancel the Pattadar passbooks issued by the 3rd respondent to unofficial respondents. lA NO: 'l OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pet; tion, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the proceedings of the Tahsildar, Tanur Mandal, dated 25.1O:2024, vide proceedings R.C.No.8121812024 before this Hon'ble Court in the above writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28. 1 1. 2022, for cancellation of the digital passbooks issued jn favour of unofficial respcnd3nts in respeci of the land in Sy. No. 185 at Ja,,,ria B village, Tanoor I\4andal, Nirmal District by conducting enquiry and veriiicaticn of RSR and revenue records, during the pendency of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.4to6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.tsHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No. 2494 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that pending acljudication of this writ petition' the Tahsildar' Tanoor Mandal, Nirmal District has conducted an enquiry over the subject land and submitted a report to the District Collector, Nirmal vide proceedings No'B/2lAl2O24' dated 25.10 .2024, as such, seeks permission of this Courf to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition on the subsequent cause of action and avail appropriate remedies as available under law' 2 Permission as sought for is accorded
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn by granting liberty as prayed for' No costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous Petitions Pending, if anY, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/, SD/- L. LAKSH ASSIST ANT BABU STRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 One CC to SRI G VASANTHA RAYUDU' Advocate lOPUCl Two CCs to GP FOR nEVfNf Uf ' iouTl High Court for the State of Telangana G,frt HIGH COURT DATED:21 101,t2025 ;r;- STA 1 1 ( aA a. c o 2 7 Ftts ?025 t D.eS PATCH cC , I I c ORDER WP.No.2494 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSiTS I (6) tSlLlL,
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.