Sri Nalkari Raju v. Sri P. Neelakantam
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT P ETITION NO: 3653 OF 2025 Between: Sri Nalkari Raju, S/o Late N. Anjaiah, aged Ql ye-ars O-cc Business, Rl/o H No' 17-7-3O7tB Brbhmanwadi, Yakapura Hyderabad 500 023 T.S AND 1 2 Sri P. Neelakantam, S/o P.Vittal Rao, aged 56 years Occ Business R/o H No' i-z-4ztltz, Gaganmahal Colony, Domalaguda Hyderabad 500 029 T.G The Honourable Court of XIV Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad 500 002 T.G ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of [\/andamus declaring inaction of the respondent in particular the 2nd respondent in not passing judgment/orders in A.s No. 121 of 2023 after being it is reserved on 1olo7 t2024 as being arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondent No.2 to pass ludgment/orders in the interest of justice' ' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA SRINIVAS RAO Counsel for the ResPondents: - The Court made the following: ORDER € '7/ THE IIOI{OURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSIIY AND THE IIO\IOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING R,\O NANDIKONDA W.P.No.3653 of 2025 ORDER, (J. er ll, tn ble Sri ,lustice P.Sam Koshy) I-iear,l N4r. Naga Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel lbr the petitioner I'enu; ed the record.
Learr Led :ounsel for the petitioner prays for withdrau,a[ of the rvrit petitiou rvith Iibefty to file a duly constituted civil revision petition 1or the lelicf sought for in the instant writ petition
With the atblesaid liberfy, the writ petition stands di; rnissed as withdr-au n. l-here shall be no order as to costs Cons:que nt11,, miscellaneous petitions pending, il anl', shall stand closer l. I To, //TRUE COPY// SDi.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR ../ \ ) SECTION OFFICER 1 The Hon'b e C)ourt of XIV Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court; Hyderabad 500 002 T.G One CC to SRI NAGA SRINTVAS RAO, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2 3 BSR GJP I HIGH COUIIT DATED: 10i02t2025 ORDER WP.No.365:3 of 2025 /, .' (J ll. it o- sr4r€ i,J 0 2 APR 2025 )EspATc\^ r.o 2 o I {' * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDFIAWN, WITHOUT C;OSTS 5 4.4 ./2 # ./< 5
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.