The High Court · 2025

26. KRamt:str Kumar Jain, s/o Late Mohanrar Jain aged about 4s years, r/o 3-3- '-' " - - - 1O,Main Road Dornakal VillandMandal Dornakal Warangai bistribt. 27. Mahav-erer_J-ar!, s/o Nemchand Jain aged about 4s years, occ Business r/o H.NO.3-3-26,Bank Street Viil and Mandit Dornakat WlAng;aD[tri6t]"'*- "- " 8ff,""i,"'?#Hi,rd:-?8r1ft[ifinfl"yfir,i]r3la f,,n"?rr,1'83]#?,r,i,:%.?",: niila! ,Jqr1, S/O Kasturchand. -J-ain aged about 78 years, Occ r/o 3-1-85/1,Main Road Viil and Mandal-Dornafa['Waiangal District.

29. Kalachira Business District. AND

1. The state of relanoana, [!p..by its principar secretary, Roads and Buirdings - Departnent, Secreiariatl HiiUeiaUia.

2. The District Collector, Warangal 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Roads & Buildings, Eramanzii, Hyderabad 4. The Suparintendent Engineer (R&B), Warangal, Warnagal District. 5. The Exer:utive Engineer(R&B), Mahabubabad, Warangal District. 6. Dornal Gram Panchavat, rep. by its sarpanch, Dornakar, viilage and Mandar, Warangal District. sPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 or the constitution of rndia praying that in the 'u" circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ilrerewith, the High pleased to issur: an appropriate writ, order or Direction, .orui".tiJ"rrv Jie'in 'c6'urt the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities in making markings on the houses of the petitioners for widening of the internal road leading from old Dornakal to Railway station through Hain Road and also upto the statue of subash chandra Bose, despite there is 100 feet lblpass road existing, without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Law, as being illegal, arbitrary unjust and unilateral and consequently direct the respondent authorities to drop the proposal of the widening of the internal road l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015 P. NO:3063 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the writ petition being devoid of merits by vacating the interim order dt. 02.07 .2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 19861 of 201S. LA. NO: 2OF 2015|WPMP. NO: 25630 0F 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including demolition of the houses of the petitioners located on the either side of the internal road leading from Old Dornakal to Railway Station through Main Road and also upto the Statue of Subash Chandra Bose, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition l.A. NO: 3 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 40874 0F 2015) Between: t 9.n! Banoth Sarala Wo. Sairam, aged about 42years, Occ: Ward Member, 8"' War{ r/o. Bankt Singh Thanda, Dornakal Viitage & Mandal, Warangai District.

2. Talari Ravikanth S/o. JohnRight, aged about 45 years, Occ: Business, r/o. H.No.1-2-47, Jayapuram, Dornakal Village & Mand;1, Warangal District. 3. Reddiboyina. Srinivas S/o. Anantharamulu, aged about 35 years, Occ: .Business, r/o. H.No.4-3-77, Patha Dornakal, Dornakal Villaga & Mandal, Warangal District.

4. Md. Aquilullqh S/o. Habeebullah, aged about 32 years, Occ: Business, r/o. H.No.3-2-132, Shanthinagar, Dornakal Village and Mandal, Warangal District. 5. Sk. Khader Baba S/o. Hussain, aged about 32 years, Occ: Business, r/o. H.No.3-3-1 15, Rajiv Nagar, Dornakal Village & Maridal, Warangal District. ...PetitionerslProposed Respondents 7 to 11 AND street, Viil Dornakal,Mandal Dornkal WarSngal Dishict. '

1. Patny 9gqrao Bhai Mo lnder Chand, aged about g0 years, r/o 5_1_13.Bank 2. Mami<li Rammurthi, s/o samtaiah aged about s6 years,occ Agriculture Rl/o H. N0.4-3-97,Vill and Mandal Dornakai Warangal Didtrict.

3. Kodunruri Narasimha Rao, s/o Ramulu,agaed about 6g yeaars r/o H.No.4-3- 4 Sadhanala Laxmi, wo rate Laxmi Narayana aged about s6 years,occ House 5. MandapalliNageshwar Rao, s/o Narayana Aged about 43 years r/o H.N0.4-3- 69 ,Oc'c Kirana shop Vill and Mandal Dorniakal Warangal Oisiiici. wife r/o H.No.4-3-136,Vill and Mandal DornakaiWarangat Oijtnci. '- - 39, Villand Mandal Dornakal Warangai Distridt. Mandal Domakai Warangal Distridt. Nagar VillandMandal Dornakal W-rangal District.

6. 9undral..Radha, W/O Bhas.ka.r.-qged ab.ou! 49 years r/o H.N0.4-2_12, lndira 7. 9anji. tlhadraiah, s/0 Mallaiah.aged about 73 years, r/o indiranagar,Vill and 8. chikur{hy Jayamma, wo Babu aged about 40 years, r/o H.No 4-2-13 rndua 9. Bandaru. Murali, s/o Ramaia.h aged about 55 years r/o H.No 4-2-3, Indira 10. Booranr Anasurva. wo Krlslr.n? .aged about g0 years r/o lndira Nagar Viil and Nagar t/lll and Mandal Dornakal Warangal Distri6t. Mandat Dornakdt Warangat oGiri&l-- ----'-- '-' nagar \/ill and Mandal Dornakal W-rangal Distriit. " $'?T:'J i*ffi ["'6f Bl$"?8f ' a bout 60 vea rs r/o r nd i ra N asa r 12.Ad.epu .layammma, wo Neerakantam aged about 70 years r/o H. No 4-2-16, ^HtJ}i'3Tf lndira n,rgar Vill and Mandal Dornakal Wirangat Districi. Dornakert Viil anb Mandat OornaxaiWaringil Dist?ict. " 8i!l: []fr"n'.fjilTi,,Yl? il,:',::iBXl;:?"1'r,iH:3:lB?"il""T 14.Alli satthi reddy, s/o venkaiah.ag.ed abotit 80 years Rio H. No 4-3-45,ord 'l5.sandra€iri sathyanarayana, s/o Narsaiah aged about 75 years R/o H.No 4-3- 16.chintamalla Jayaraju, S/o prilaiah aged about 43 years R/o H.No 4-2-17 . 19 , tndi-a nagai Viil arid Mandat Dornaxal Wiianlit oistrict. r/o H No 4- lndira na gar Vit[ anrj Mandat DarnakatW;;ndji oiitri"t. nagar Vlll and Mandal Dornak-al Warangal Oi6trict.

17.Battu Kishan, S/o Kes.aru aged,.about 43 years R/o H.No 4-1-79, Bapuji 18.shaik serkeenabi, wo Ari(late) aged aboul g5 years R/o H.No 4-3-20, rndira nagar Vitl and Mandal Dornaka-l Warangal Distriii 19.9.Ram !4q!gn, S/o G.Satynar.ayana-aged alout 46years, Occ Agriculture r/o H.No.4-3-1 57, otd Dornakat Viti'and nltlnaat Oornaial wiiangli di;nd.'' " " 20.Mudhulag.hg1 Jnglapr:akgph, s/o LFte Mallari Rao rto 3_2_62,Main Road Dornakal Vlll and Mandal Doinakal Warangil Dstiiict. District. "H&1*11'H5i:tl."lif, itr*X?B';'*?::u,igil,0ff :"&:: 'Rif fl ?l!,XjilS#S?lvi{""R,fi *?llSg:"1Hii,V#:,,,ifl [,P,"TBusiness "iB?TlJ,:,,fifl

23.Kala Raj kumar Jain, S/o Santhulal Jain aged about 59 years, Occ Business r/o 3-1-83,Main Road Dornakal Villand Mandal Dornakal Warnagal District. 24.Praburam Sarma, S/O Gopaji aged about 38 years, Occ Buisness Main Road,Vill and Mandal Dornakal Warangal District.

25.Trilokchnad Jain, S/o Late Hanuman bagas aged aboul 77 years, Occ Business r/o 3-1-6,Main Road,Dornakal Villand Mandal Dornakal Warangal District.

26.K.Ramesh Kumar Jain, s/o Late Mohanlal Jain aged about 45 years, r/o 3-3- 10,Main Road Dornakal VillandMandal Dornakal Warangal District. 2T.Mahaveer Jain, S/O Nemchand Jain aged about 45 years, Occ Business r/o H.NO.3-3-26,Bank Street Vill and Mandal Dornakal Warangal District.

28.Suresh Upadhyaya, S/O Sankarlal Upadhyaya aged about 40 years, Occ Business r/o H.NO.3-1-92, Main Road Vill and Mandal Dornakal Warangal District.

29. Kalachiranjilal Jain, S/O Kasturchand Jain aged Business r/o 3-1-85/1,Main Road Vill and Mandal Do about 78 Years, Occ rnakal, Warangal District.

30.The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...WRIT PETITIONERS

31. The District Collector, Warangal

32.The Engineer-in-Chief, Roads & Buildings, Erramanzii, Hyderabad

33.The Superintendent Engineer (R&B), Warangal, Warnagal District.

34.The Executive Engineer(R&B), Mahabubabad, Warangal District.

35.Dornal Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Sarpanch, Dornakal, village and Mandal, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS IN W.P. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioners herein as respondents 7 to 11 in the above WP as well in the WPMP Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PONUGUPATI SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY (SC FORTG ZPP.MPP-GPPS) The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH No. 20L ORDER: Learned.Counselappearingforthepetitioners subrnits that after filing of the writ petition, the f€sprsndents have issued notice to the petitioners, in vieu, of the sarne, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are necessary in this matter and thereby, the Writ Petition has become infrrctuous.

2. Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, all the interlocutory applications shalt stand closed. SD'- M.JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One Crl to SRI PONUGUPATI SUMAN, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two Crlsto GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS, High Courtforthe State of 3. ONC C-r] tO SRI G. NARENDER REDDY (SC fOr TG ZPP.MPP-GPPS) [OPUC] 4. Two Cll Copies Telangana. IOUTI BN PSK dl1 HIGH COURT DATED:tl4l1112 25 0 t= Li 1 HE S Y 1 6 irAll 7 )i l WP.No.19861 of 2015 * 0r t) DISMISSII{G THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT.COSTS ,e