Criminal Petition No. 3405 of 2004 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
“HENCE, THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
The state of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Respondent/complainant in do AND COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: M/s. T. Pradyumnakumar Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition Under Sections 438 of Cr.P.C. praying The High Court to direct the Station House Officer L&O Governorpet Police Station, Vijayawada and to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 34/2002 of Governorpet L&O Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. The Court made the following
O R D E R:
Operative part
PETITIONER SEEKS TO RENEW HIS REQUEST FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL. HIS APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL HAS BEEN DISMISSED BY THIS COURT EARLIER IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2958 OF 2004 ON THE PREMISE THAT HE IS NOT ARRAYED AS ACCUSED AND THAT HE WOULD MOVE FOR BAIL, IF THERE WAS AN INCLUSION OF HIS NAME IN THE CRIME
. “A PERUSAL OF THE RECORD SHOWS THAT IT IS SAID THAT UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COUNSEL, A-1 AND A-2 BROKE OPEN THE LOCK. THE PROPERTY IN THIS CASE AS SEIZED FROM THE POSSESSION OF A-1”. “INVIEW OF THE SAME, THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER APPEARS TO BE GENUINE, AND HIS APPREHENSION IS REAL”.
HENCE, THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED. THE PETITIONER SHALL BE ENLARGED ON BAIL, IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST, ON HIS EXECUTING A BOND FOR RS. 5000/- WITH TWO SURETIES FOR THE LIKESUM EACH TO THE SATISFACTION OF STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOVERNORPET L&O POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ON SUCH RELEASE, HE SHALL APPEAR BEFORE HIM AS AND WHEN REQUIRED AND SHALL CO-OPERATE WITH THE INVESTIGATION IN THIS CASE
. // TRUE COPY // Sd/- K. VIVEKNAND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To KNK
The SHO, Governorpet L&O Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT)
One CC to Mr. T. Pradyumnakumar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare Copy. HIGH COURT DATE: 9-8-2004 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.No. 3405 of 2004 BAIL GRANTED DRAFTED BY: KNK DRAFTED ON : 9-8-2004 HIGH COURT TCSR,J DATE: 9-9-2004
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: “HENCE, THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Aug 2004.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.