The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS ! Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No.106, admeasuring 200 Sq.yds in Sy.No.36/24, situated at Phase ll, Virlayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Didtrict and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing ani notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of thd petitioner in respect of his Plot No.106, admeasuring 200 Sq.yds, comprised in Sy.No.36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, l I I a Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without foll(,r /ing due process of lavt and without issuing notice. I lA NO: 1 OF 2022 I i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr thd affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma1 Respondent No.3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates not t: pobsession of the Petitioner in respect of her Plot No. 10 Sqlyds, comprised in Sy.No.36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vir Gdpanpally Village, Serilingampally t\/andal, Ranga Re l following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Jmstances stated in be pleased to direct interfere with the i, admeasuring 200 ryak Nagar Colony, 1y District, without counse I for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5: SMT. S. SRA'/ \NTHI, AGP FOR RE\/ :NUE Colunsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADI IINISTRATION ] URBAN DEVELOPMENT I Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA Rl: )DY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIE! ,AL Court made the following: ORDER t -7/ // IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3646 of 2022 (DATED, THIS THE lorrr DAy OF DECEMBER, 2025) Between: Sri Gali Hrudaya Raju AND ...Petitioner

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others. ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. a

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the SI(,J action of respondent Nos.3, 4 and their sut ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the li ncing stones 1n respect of petitioner's Plot No. 106, admtasuring 2O0 Sq.yards in Sy.No.36 f 24, situated at Phase II, \/ nayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally M r nda-l, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess t he petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice rnd without following due process of law, as illegal and arbitr rry

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that while admitting the matter, this Court passed nterim order dated 28.01.2022 with a direction to maintai t status quo existing as on that date until the next date r ,f hearing in respect of the subject property. However, in sp te of lapse of more than three and half years, the responder t authorities a did not chose to hle counter or vacate petitiorL denying the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. In ) 7 3 SK,J view of the same, Iearned counsel requested this Court to allow the writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner respect to the subject property without following due process 1n of law.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government \ Pl"rd., for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents will not interfere with the petitioner's possession of the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders' In view of the submissions made on either side, this 5. Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in .Plot No.106, admeasuring 2OO Sq'yards ln Sy.No.36/24, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony' I I a 4 sr,J \ Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, i anga Reddy District, without following due procedure of lan.. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending n this Writ Petition, shall stand closed SD/- I4.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSII |TANT REGISTRAR "7 / //TRUE COPY// \ $.r,oN oFFrcER To

1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Departmer of Revenue, T.S Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 13. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Divisior RR District. i+. tne Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Di trict, 5. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State o Telangana, at 7. fwo CC to ihe GP for Municipal Administration Urban l) >velopment, High B. One CC to Sri Putta Krishn-a Reddy, SC for Municipalit e s[OPUCD] 9. Two CD Copies Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT] Hyderabad [OUT] i J T I ) H GH COURT oAteo:t ot1ztzo2s I i I o DER I WP.No.3646 of 2022 l o( ,ii,*o. _ -.,i\1.. i0 Jr 1) ; * .,:: ,'/ . -:,.2 Ir , .-) \\'^\i? \: D SPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION a I WITHOUT COSTS r +/'