The High Court · 2025

4. P.Archana, W/o.Srinivas Goud, Aged about 28 years, Occ Agriculture, 5. lVl.Lakshmi, W/o.Shankariah, Aged about 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 6. ltilanne Raju, S/o. Raja [r/allalah, Aged aiiout 35 years, Occ Agflculture, 7. R.Pradeep Reddy, S/o.Rama Chandra Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture, B. IV.l\/ogulaiah, S/o Late l\,4allesh, Aged about 50 year , Occ Agricutture, 9. Kotha Ratnamma, W/o. Vithalaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ Agriculture, 10. B.Lakshmamma, Wio.Janamarah, Aged about 49 years, Occ Agriculture, 11. Kotha Vithlaiah, S/o.Lakshmaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture, 12. P.Galaiah, S/o.P.Venkaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ Agriculture, 13. M.Shankaraiah, S/o.Chennaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ Agriculture, 14. R,lVallamma, Wio.Rama Chandra Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture,

15. lVl.Ramulu, S/o.Buchaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ Agriculture, 16. Smt.Kamalamma, W/o. Chendraiah, Aged about 48 years. Occ Agriculture, 17. Pandari, S/o.Rama Goud, Aged about 62 years, Occ Agriculture, 18.Ashok, Sio.Hanumath, Aged about 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 19. K.Gopal, S/o.K.Gangaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture, 20. A.Narsimulu, S/o.Kistaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture, 21 . A. Lakshmamma, S/o.A. Narsimulu, Aged about 46 years, Occ Agriculture, 22. B. Venkatesham, S/o.Shankaraih, aged about 50 yrs,, Occ Agriculture, 23, B.Surender, S/o.Shankaraiah, aged about 42 yrs., Occ Agriculture, 24. K.Sugunamma. W/o.Shiva Goud, aged about 60 Yrs., Occ Agriculture, 25. Koteedi Lakshmamma, W/o.K.Narimlu, aged about 45 yrs., Occ Agriculture, '.. f: i

26. G. tr,/alleshn ari, w/o.Ramulu, aged about 30 yrs., Occ,\1riculture, (All are R/o.Perldapur Village, Sadasivpet Mandal, Sangar,,;ddy District.) AND .PETITIONERS 1 Stateof Tel lngana. Rep by its Principal Secretary, T.fl rnd B Deparlment. navrng Ufitce at Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Dlstrict Collector, Sanga Reddy District, having ot e at Sanga Reddy Engineer in Chief (R & B) Roads, having office at Errar.r Manzrl, Telangana State, Hyder'abad. The Thasild;:r Sadasivpet l\/andal, having office at Sa,r,rsivpet Sanga Reddy District. 2 3 4 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lnrl a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High may be pleased to issue an order, writ or Writs more partrcure-ry in the natuie of lVlandamus declari rg the action of the respondents herein r tryinE to dispossess the petitioners from their agricultural lands mentioned in the tabular column, situated at Peddalrur Vilrage, Sadasivpet l\r1andar, sanga i,.:ddv district, without due process of larv as illegal, arbitrary and against the pr.rvislons of the Land Acquisition Act, an I unconstitutional and consequently direo the respondents not to interfere in th() petitioner's peaceful possession anrl enjoyment of their agricultural land s 'cJurt l.A. NO: 1 OF 20 17iWPM P. NO: 8538 OF 2017) Petition und(,r section 151 cpc praying lhat in the ci- umstances stated rn the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High court m:,, be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere in the petitioner's peil'..eful possession and enjoyment of the pt:titioner's agricultural lands mentioned rr abuiar form situated at Peddapur Village. Sadasivpet lr,4andal, Sanga Reddy distr : . Counsel for the Pe':itioner: SRl. NyAyApATHI PRASHANT Counsel for the Re:;pondents: SRI M.VIGNESWAR REDDy GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made th() following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.6942 of 2OL7 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and M.Vigneswar Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings appearing for the respondents and pcrused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are questioning the action of the respondents hcrein in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the agricultural lands situated at Peddapur Village, Sadasivpet Manda-l, Sanga reddy District, without following due process of 1aw.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings basing on the para Nos.6 and 7 of the counter hled by the respondents submits that the respondents are not) interfering with the possession of the petitioner and l ! .ri a s,(,J ,r .6912 oJ 2017 W they have c()nducted detailed survey and lzirr.l acoulsltron process u.as initiated and compensation tO the acquired land r.l'as al.-eady paid to the affected land r \vners. The land of the petitioner is not required as ; ut rrf total sanctioncd l:ngth of 8.27 km a length ol -) lC (m., in 3/850 to 5;/950 is already widened anrl completed. Wherever new alignment is necessitated in < r 2 / 5OO to 3l2OO the L..A,. process is initiated. The road u oik is being taken up r,r,i1hir-r available ROW as confirmec by Rer,enue Authorities. 'lhe R&B Department is following 1:rocerlure as stipulated urnder 1au, and u,ork is being taken u:: u,itl-rin the available (R&3) land only u.ithout taking petitir,: Lr_-r_s lands.

4. In vier.r, of the submissions made by bot I sides, the writ petition is clisposed of directing the resporL len:s not to interfere rvith the possession of the petitioner in rhe subject property, r.r'ith out following due process of lau,. There sha11 be no order as; to costs. I / ,,/| To, \ 3 SKJ W.P.No.69a2 of 2017

5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shail stand c1o sed. SDA M. OSMAN ALI BAI TANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, T,R and B Department having Office at Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, having office at Sanga Reddy 3, Engineer in Chief (R & B), Roads, having office at. Erram Manzil, Telangana State, Hyderabad. 4 The Thasildar, Sadasivpet IVandal, having office at Sadasivpet, Sanga Reddy District.

5. One CC to SRl. NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Roads and Buildings, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies KK GJ o HIGH COURT DATED:0914712025 \ C :)|,.. ') 18 tl[I 2q5 :1 I'u -", . . \ ;-rj I r,r' ORDER WP.No.6942 of 2017 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q $