✦ High Court of India · 04 Mar 2025

Dharavath Kamli v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,015 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in non-following the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C. nor '1 74 of B.N.S.S. and non-initiating to register the F.l.R. against the Respondent Nos. 7 to 19 who hatched a plan to grab the land of the Petitioner to an extent of 4c.5.12 Gts in Survey No. 185 & 186 which is situated at Gurrala Dandi Village, Bibinagar Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District and trespassed into the land of the petitioner and attacked with deadly weapons and tried to kill petitioner and created panic situations is illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to follow the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 1 54 (3) of Cr. P.C. or Section 1 74 of B.N.S.S. Act and take the necessary action against illegal activities of the Respondent Nos. 7 to 19 by registering the F.l.R. basing on the complaint dated 2811212024 who are trespassed into the lands of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.5.12 Gts in Survey No.185 & 186N which is situated at Gurrala Dandi Village, Bibinagar Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District and damaged the crops and tried to kill the Petitioner with deadly weapons. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to follow the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C. or Section 174 of B.N.S.S. Act and take the necessary action against illegal activities of the Respondent Nos. 7 to '19 by registering the F.l.R. basing on the complaint daled 28.12.2024 who are trespassed into the lands of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.S.12 Gts in Survey No. 185 & 1BO which is situated at Gurrala Dandi Village, Bibinagar l\,'landal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District and damaged the crops and tried to kill the Petitioner with deadly weapons pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1to6 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.7to19 : - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VI]AYSEN REDDY ORDER: wRrTP ON No. 2 20 of 2()25 Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated

19.02.2025 to the Registry stating that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting the liberty sought for. The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ,TRUE COPY// 5 ,'. L. VIJAYA LAXMI IS ANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate. [O Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies. BSK GJP 8r To, 1 2 3 HIGH COURT DATED:0410312025 ORDER WP.No.2201 of 2025 lkl E STA r€ ( i zg it;,t zll25 \\ a a c'. -n r 7: .rf-$ t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS (r, X) 2\ @

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments