Goparaju Jayasri v. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 15 Mar 2007
- Bench
- L NARASIMHA REDDY
Outcome
Disposed of
Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5297 of 2007
O R D E R: Petitioner is said to be the owner of an extent of
Operative part
277.77 square yards of land in plot No.3 in Survey No.151 part of Vepagunta Village, Visakhapatnam District. She executed a general power attorney in favour of one Sri K.Subrahmanyam, who, turn, entered into an agreement of sale, in respect of the said property. The General Power of Attorney Holder of the petitioner presented the said agreement of sale to the second respondent for registration. The grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent is not accepting the document for registration, on the ground Government issued a notification under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short ‘the Act’), in respect of the land in the said Survey Number. This writ petition is filed seeking appropriate directions to the respondents, in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Section 22-A of the Act empowered the Government to issue notifications almost preventing the registration of documents in respect of the lands to be mentioned therein. Such a power was held to be ultra vires and the provision was struck down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan v. Basanth Nahata [1] . Once the sole basis for the second respondent to refuse registration had disappeared, he is under obligation to receive the documents and consider the same, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and the Registration Act. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to receive and process the document presented by the General Power of Attorney Holder of the petitioner and take necessary steps, in accordance with the provisions of Indian Stamp Act and Registration Act, within one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Date: 15.03.2007 JSU ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J [1]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Registration Act, 1908; Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Mar 2007. The bench was L NARASIMHA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.