High Court · 2025

4. Vanhya Sai Kumar, S/o. Varthya Srinu, Aged about 25 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Ryo. 9-5, Ponna Gutta Thanda, Maharajpet, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. Pathloth Hanmya, S/o. Pathloth Somla, Aged about 28 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 8-8, lrrikunta Thanda, Maharajpet, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

6. Path Loth Jagan, S/o. Pathloth Somla, Aged dbout 25 Years, Occ. Agriculture, B/s, 8-&, {rrkunta,.Ihanda, Maharajpet; ShankerpaHy Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

7. Pathloth Kishan, S/o. Pathloth Naresh, Aged about 25 Years, Occ. Daily wager, R/o. 7-161'l, Kakarlagunta Thanda, Irrikunta Gram Panchayat, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. Pathloth Srikanth, S/o. Pathloth Laxman, Aged about 18 Years, Occ. Daily wager, Rl/o. 8-10, lrrikunta Thanda, Maharajpet, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 . The State Of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, AC Guards Rd, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2. The Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Having its Office at Tellapur, ' Telangana.

3. The Telangana Pollution Control Board, Represented by its Member- Secretary Having its office at Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad.

4. The District C)ollector, Ranga Reddy District, Having its Office at Kongarakalan, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Orders Declaring the action of Respondents in not c;onsidering the Representations Dated '13.11.2024 made by the Petitioners to the Respondents requesting them to Relocate/Remove the Kollur Compost Shed/Dump Yard from its current location as it is in close proximity to lrrikunta Gram Panchayat, as unjust, arbitrary, untenable and violative of principles of natural justice and Consequently to CTIRECT the Respondents to consider the Representations Dated 13.1 1.2024 :;ubmitted by the Petitioners and thereby to relocate/remove the Kollur Composl Shed/Dump Yard from its current location, as it is in close proximity to lrrikunta Gram Panchayat. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Resporrdents to consider the Representations Dated 13.11.2024 to the Respondents thereby to relocate/remove the Kollur Compost Shed/Dump Yard from its current location, as it is in close proximity to lrrikunta Gram Panchayat. Counsel for the Petitioners: MS. D. SHIVANI REDDY, REPRESENTTNG M/S RESU LAW OFFICE Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA, Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRt ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD, Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, The Court made the following: ORDER GP FOR REVENUE THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHTEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. WSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION No.2155 of 2025 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paut) Ms.D.Shivari Reddy, Iearned counsel representing M/s.Resu Law Ofhce, for the petitioners; Sri Krishna Reddy Putta, learned counsel for respondent No.2; Sri Zeeshan Adnan Mahmood, learned counsel for respondent No.3; and Sri Mura-lidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent No.4

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner advanced singular submission. She submits that the representation of the petitioners dated 13.ll .2024 is pending consideration before respondent No.2, which may be directed to be decided within the stipulated time. I I

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that he has no obiection if such representation of the petitioners is directed to be decided within thirty days from the date of presentation of a copy of this order

4. Learned counsel for the other respondents ha,",e also not raised any objectron

5. Accordinly'y, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioners to resubmit the representation dated 13.11.,.,),O24 along with a copy of this order to respondent No.2. In turn, r-.espondent No.2 sha1l consider and decide the said representation in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking orde4 within thirty days therefrom. The outcome shall be communicated to the petitioners. It is made clear that this Court has not exp.ressed any opinion on the lnerits of the case. No costs. Miscellant:ous petitions pending, if any, shall stancl closed. /ffRUE COPYII SD.K.SREERAMA MURTHY SqrsrANT REGI9-IBA- SECTION OFFICER To, r of Munici pal 1 . The Princi pal Secreta ry, Commissioner and Di 2. The Administration, AC Guards Rd, Masab Tank Hyderabad, The State Of Telansana,. Telanga na Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Having its Office at Tellapur, Tela ngana The Member-{lecreta ry Havi ng its office at San Pollution Control Bo ard, Hyd erabad. The District Collecto r, Ranga Redd y District, Having its Office ai Kongarakalan Ranga Reddy District One CC to I\,4/r; Resu Law Two CCs to GP for Muni ct for the State of felangana, at Hyderabad louTj Two CC to The Gp for Revenu e, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyde rabadloutl One CC to Sri 2leeshan Adnan Mahmood, Advocate [OPUC One CC to Sri Zeeshan Adnan Mahmood, AdvocateI OPUC] Office, Advocate [oPUCl pal Administration ath Nagar, The Telangana Urban Development, High Court

8. I 1 0. Two CD Co 3 4 5 6

7. TJ LS Y* I r HIGH COURT DATED:1 110312025 ORDER WP.No.2155 of 2025 -i T t o ( o 1 L 0 IA 2025 ( I + DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS fl A- ') 3 2rS