Pinna Mahender v. '1 . The_S-late of Telangana

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction, directing the Respondents forthwith consider the representations submitted by the Petitioner dated 16-12-2024 and 18-12-2024for referring the matter to the Third Party Expert Committee for identifying correct answer to question No.43 in respect of Divisional Test Paper-l (Paper Code No 030) held in the month of May, 2023 session for Departmental Tests November, 2023, pending disposal of the wit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.V.RAMANA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SERVICES - | Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI P.S.RAJASHEKAR, SC FOR TELANGANA SATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21o4 OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent ol the parties, tllis Writ Petitit-rrr is taken ltp lbr disposal, at the stage of admissiorr rtsell 2, 'lhis Writ Petition is llled uncler Article 2 rb ol ConsLitutiou ol lndia seeking the lbllowing reliel- ".-.to issue a Writ, order or directttltt, more partrcularlv ottr ttt lltc natule ol' Writ ol Mandalnus, declarirlg thc actlotl ut lllr l'ul)llc Servlce Commrssron in not rel'errrng the mattcr 1o tllc llllr(l l'art\ Dxpert Committee lor identil\'itlg corre(rt answer to (luestlotl No.-{.1 itt respect el Divisional 'l'est Paper I (l'aper Co(le No.O3Ol lrel(l rrl Decernber, Mav, '2023 sessions, ln sl)lte ol sttlrlrrittlllll representations dated 16-12-2O24 and lll l2 2t)24, ilt sl)rt(j ol Produr:ing valid evidence lbr treating option No.2 selcclc(l l)\' llre petrtioner is the right answer as illegal, arbitrary and violatcs 1\l'ticle$ l-+, lb an(l 2 t oi the Constitutlon ol Indta arlcl colrse(luer lt lall\' (llrccl the Respondents to reler the malter lo thr .l''r l'arl\' Uxperl Committee to tind out correct answer to Questton No.43 ()l lllvlsl()llal 'l'est Paper-l (Paper Code No.03O) held irr Mav, 2023 $essror itrr(l t(, Pass..."

3. Heard Sri P.V. Ramana, learnecl counsel lbr thc petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Services-l lor responclenl No. l; and Sri P.S.Raia Shekar, learnecl Standing Counsel lor 'l'elangatrit State Public Service Commission, lbr resp<;ndent No.2.

4. Lezrrned counsel for the petitioner submits that thc peLitioner was appointed as Junior Assistant irl AugLlst 2UOt3, sr-r bsctlr-tentll', promoted to the post ol Senior Assistant in thc .vctrr, ')UJ:, and working as such till date. For promotion to the next trtgher cadrc i.c., District Accounts Ofhcer, the petltionel' is requtrccl to Pass n vtlt )t{)4 2025 departmenkrl tcst in Divisional Test Paper- 1 (Paper Cocle No.O3O). Therefore. thr: petit-ioner applied for the said test in Mav 2023 scssion and appeared for the Computer Based Test.

5. lrr rcspecl ol' question No.43 i.e., 'Expenses inr:urred on advertrsemenl rs an example of', the petitioner selected option No.2 i.c., 'Rcvenur: expenditure' li'om the available options. However, treating thc said option as incorrect, the petitior-rer was not awarded onc rnark lbr the question. As a result, the petitioner is short o[ onc mark. After publication of the results, the petitioner madc a representation to respondent No.2 on lB.l2.2O24.justifving that option No.2 is correct based on page No.243 of Intermediatc First Year Accountancv book by Telangana State Board of' lntermediatc Education, Telugu Academy and also Financial Accounting-l lor B.Com. and requested to appoint a third partv Expert Committee. However, the same is pending for consideration. Therefbre. lcarned counsel for the petitioner pravs this Court to dircct rcspondcnt No.2 to consider the representation, dated

111.12.2024. submitted bv the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders, withrn a stipulated period of time.

6. Lcarne<i Standing Counsel lbr respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 will consider the representation of the petitioner. datccl 1IJ.t2.2O24 and pass appropriate orders. in accorclance with Ia u, -) lrA'N,./ \Vl) : ll)'l :(,!:'

7. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel lbr the respective parties and without goin,{ into thc tncrit.s ol thc case, this Writ Petition is disposed oi directing respondcnt No.2 [o c<.rnsi<ler the representation, dated La.l'2.20'24, submrttecl bv thc petitioner, and pass appropriatc orders thereon, strictlv itt accordance with law, as expeditiouslv as possible , prel'erzrbl.y within a periocl ol tbur (4) weeks from the date ol receipt ot it copv ol this order ilnd communicate a copY thereol to thc petitiorlcr. 'lirere shall be rto order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, il any, shall stancl closecl. SD/- P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// s TION OFFICER Hyderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, I and CAD Department, Dr.B.R. ^ Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. The Secretary, Telangana State Public Service Commission, Nampally, 3. One CC to SRI P.V.RAMANA, Advocate tOpUCl 4. ONE CC tO SRI P.S.RAJASHEKAR, SC FbR TELANGANA SATE PUBLIC 5. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES- l, High Court for the State of Telangana at 6. Two CD Copies SERVtCE COMMTSSTON (OPUC) Hyderabad. [OUT] g \ To SA ,/ r{E srAr€ J ,.) t]6 ril Zflffi ],z a Og.SD^TC\r7_O HIGH COURT DATED:2710112025 ORDER WP.No.2104 of 2O2S DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. {, qc- ;\,vr