Ms.Cheera Anusha v. 1. The State of Telangana

3. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda Division, Nalgonda District. 5. 'The Tahsildar, Chityal Mandal, Nalgonda District. 6. Mr.Syed AzajAhmed, S/o.Ayyad Ali, Age.45 years, Occ.Agriculture, Fl/o.Nalgonda Town and District.

7. Smt.Sayeda Bhanu, Wo.Sayyed Ali, Age. 45 years, Occ.Agriculture, Fl/o.Nalgonda Town and District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate,writ, order or direetion more,particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in non-considering online application of the petitioner through vide No.2300161404 dated 15-1 1 -2023 and non-initiating to cancel the illegal pattadar passbook of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 who are issued on the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.0.21 guntas in Sy.No.348lJ2, Ac.0.20 guntas in Sy.No.390, Ac.0.20 guntas , :.:;,:, : -i;Er:."' " 3ffiii;i':: in Sy.No.39t2lJ, Ac.0.15 guntas in Sy.No.348, Ac.0.04 guntas in Sy.No.366/1, Ac.0.14 guntas in Sy.No.369l2, Ac.0.30 guntas in Sy.No.390/1, Ac.2.00 guntas in Sy.No.392 and Ac.0.09 guntas in Sy.No.411, which is situated at Chinakaparthy Village, Chil.yal Mandal, Nalgonda District, which are issued by the respondent Nos.3 to 5 on the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without having right, title and physical possession to them on the land of the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles, 14, 15, 21 and 300 of Constitution:of lndia and also violative of natural justice and r:onsequently to direct respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider my online application and cancel the illegal pattadar passbook of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and do the needfuljustice to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petitior under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.S not to entertain registration in the joint family property of the petitioner on the name of third parties and do the needful justice to the Petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF ?.024 Petitior under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responderrt Nos.3 to 5 to consider my online application and cancel the illegal pattadar passllook of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and do the needfuljustice to the Petitioner, perding disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UDIT NAAYAN, REPRESENTING SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, ADVOCATE -counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 5: MS., T.S"!ry.LIg.HS$|_"qgE S*EILENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 and 7: The Court made the following: ORDER -r';";.:.' '.;r-'gg IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL \[I.P.No.2L2O of 20.24 Date: L7.12.2025 Between Cheera Anusha AND petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. ...respondents 0II{DIEa{ This Writ Petition is fited to declare the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in not considering the online the petitioner vide Application application of No.230Ot6t4}4 dated 15-1L-2O23 and not initiating to cancel the illegal pattadar pass book of the respondent and.7 who were issued on the tand of the petitioner :.".u \ 2 EVV,J W.P.No.2l20 of 2024 to arr extent of Ac.O.21 gts in Sy. No.348/J2, Ac.O.2O gts in S1'. No.39O, Ac.O.20 gts in Sy. No.392lJ, Ac.0.15 gts in Sy. I{o.348, Ac.0.O4 gts in Sy. No.366ll, Ac.0.14 gts in Sy. N'o.369/2, Ac.O.30 gts in Sy. No.39OlL, Ac.2.OO gts in Sy. l{o.392 and Ac.O.09 gts in Sy. No.411, situated in Chinakaparthy vi[[age, Chityal Mandal, Nalgonda District, whictr were issued by the respondent Nos.3 to 5 on the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without having right, title and physi,:al possession to them on the land of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. '.2. Heard Sri Udit Naayan, learned counsel, representing Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. T. Swetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondent Nos.l to 5. Perused the material available on record.

3. When the matter is taken up for consi.deration, learnec: counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction to responrlent Nos.3 to 5 to examine and pass orders on her 3 EVV,J W.P.No.2l20 o12024 (1 application No.2300 161404 dated 15- 1 l-2O23 pending before respondent authorities

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that considerable time would be taken consideration of petitioner's application No.23OO l6L4O4 dated l5-ll-2o23 and for passing \ \ appropriate orders.

5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the material available on record, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing respondent Nos.3 to 5 to pass appropriate orders on the application No.23o0l6l4o4 dated 15-11-2023 submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, after conducting thorough enqui.y, issuing necessary notice to the petitioner and all interested witnesses and afford them sufficient opportunity of hearing, as expeditiousty as possible, preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this ,r 4 EVV,J W.P.No.2l20 of 2024

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions peniling, if any, shall stand closed. To, 1 /TRUE COPY// ' SD/. A. SREENIVASA REDDY SECTION OFFICER Department, 2 . The chief commissioner of Land Administration, Near Annapurna Hotel, : - Nampaily, Hyderabad. 3. The Dis;trict coilector, Nargonda, Nargonda District. 4' The Re'venue Divisionat Officer, Natgonda Division, Nalgonda District. 5. The Tatrsildar, chityar Mandar, Nargonda District. 6. One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two ccs to Gp for Revenue. High court for the State of rerangana, at 8. Two CD Copies Hyderabad IOUTI TJ GJP \q. HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 T-l tE WP.No.2120 of 2024 TI.IE S ( ,:J * 23 APR 202$ .1!i).. ' * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS ,JtA 6v t C, r! .;il*;-+,# :,.jiiffiHt