S/o G. Beerarah, Assisrant Lineman ApCpDCL, Jogipet, tr,4edak 2 v. Sangameswar. S/o. \/eerajah

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particurarry one rn the nature of wrrt of mandamus decraring the discrimrnatory action of the respondents in payment of equal pay for equal work for the services rendered by the petitioners on par with the regurar employees as well as the contract Labourers of the respondents No 3 to 5 herein as arbitrary, ilegar, viorative of the fundamentar rights guaranteed to the petrtioners under Article 14, 16,21 and Directive Princrples of State Poricy under Articre 3g(d) of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondenrs to pay salaries to the petitioners on par with the regular employees of the respondents No.3 to 5 including all the benefits. I.A.NO:1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 32131 OF 2008) Petition under section 15-1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents to pay the arrears of Fixed rraveling Allowance from 01.02.06 to till date payabre to the petitroners and continue to pay the same, pending disposal of the above writ petrtion I.A.NO:2 OF 2008( WPMP. NO: 32132 OF 2008) Petition Under sectron 1rr1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the salaries to the petitioner on par with the regulr employees of the respondents No.3 to 5 including all the benefits, pendrng disposal of the above writ petition. l.A.NO:1 OF 200 9(WPMP NO: 16962 OF 2009) Petition Under Section 'l 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High court may be pleased to lake the above writ petition for hearing on out of Turn basis. l.A.NO:j OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 20184 OF 2010) Petition Under Sectron 1 51 CPC prayrng that in the circunrstances stated rn the affidavtt filed rn suppcrt of the petrtron. the Hrgh Court may be pleased to take the above writ petrtron for hearing on out of tLrrn basis. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: SRI P.R.BALARAMI REDDY The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI ] USTICE NAPIAVARAPU RAJ ESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24615 OF 2oo8 ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.09.2025,

07.1O.2025 and 28.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on

18.11.2025 under the caption 'For Dismissal'. In spite of the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. it appears that the petrtioners are not having any interest t() prosecute [he matter.

2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD .M. JAWAHAR REDDY A ISTANT REGISTRA ECTION OFFICER To l i Hyderabad. [OUT]

1. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, Hrgh Court for t eSt 2 One CC to SRI V.R REDDY KOWURI, Advocate 3 one CC to SRI P R.BALARAMI REDDY Advocate (oPUC) 4. Two CD Copies UCI te of Telangana at SA BS *g- HIGH COURT DATED:1811112025 R liiE s T^, c 2 I ri 18 2026 oJ\ * D\.. t ORDER WP.No.24615 of 2008 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON _ PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. Al" b 1