RAMAKKAPETA RAVINDER REDDY v. l.THESTATEoFTELANGANA

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, fhe High Court may be pleasedtoissueanappropriateWrit,orderorDirection,moreparticularlyonein the nature of Writ of Mandamus, questioning the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No.4 in issuing Letter Dated 17 '12'2024' vide Lr. No. B/399i2024 in declaring the Respondent No'8 is in possession of sy.No.1379 situat( (i at Mariyala Village, Bommalaramaranr l,4andal, yadadri Bhuvanagiri Distric thereby Respondent No.7 in registenn I -he Rectiiication Deed Dated 03.01 :2025 bearing Document No. 58 o{ 2o2ri i-t favour of the Respondent No.8 a rd the same is iltegal, Arbitrary and against .:o the Article 21 and 300 A of const tution of lndia and against to the principles; or Natural Justice and consequenty s:rt aside the Letter Dated 11 .12.2o2a, vide L -.No.B/3 ggt2o24 issued by Respor Jent No.4 and to cancer the Rectification Deed Dated 03.01 .2025 bearrng Document No. 58 of 2025 registered in favour-of Respondent No.B. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition unde section 151 cpc praying that in the circ:u r.rsta nces stated in the affidavit fileJ .r support of the petition, the High Court rna,r be pleased to susPEND lmpugyne; Letter Dated 11 .12.2024,vide Lr.No.8/399/2024 issued by Respondent No.4, z rrd to cancer Rectification Deed Dated o:).01.202s bearing Document No 58 :>f 2O2S registered by Respondent No.7 in favour of Respondent No.8 pe -,ding disposar of the writ petition in rhe interost of justice. Counsel for the Peti,ioner: SRI RAVINDER REDDY MUppU Counsel for the Resrrondent No.1 to 7: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the rollowing: ORDER I HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRITPETITIO N No.2935 OF 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: " ...to issue an appropiate Wit, Order ot Direction, more pnrticularly one in tht nature of Wit of Mandaruus, questioning tlu action of Respondents more particalarly iespowlent No.4 in issuing lztter Dated 17'12'2024 oide 'tr.No.ABee2OZi in dectning tlu Resporulent No.8 is in posxssion of Sy'No' 1379 sihu;tud at Maiyai Village, Bommalaramoram Mnndnl, Yadadi Bhuaanagii District, thereby Respondent No.7 in registenng the Rechfcttion Deed Diteit 03.01.2025 beiing Documenr No. 58 of 2025 in fnaour ol the Respondent No.8 anil the same is illegal, Arbitrnry and against to tle Article 27 oni 3OO A of Constitution of lndia anrl against to the pinciples of Natural lustict and convqruntly st aside the bttur Dated 17-1'2.2024 aide Lr'No'B/399p44 issued by i<"tpria"nt No 4 and to canul tht Rectifcotiott Deed Dated 03'01'2025 beaingbocu.ment No. 58 of 2025 registered in faoour of Resporulent No'8 ond to grant..."

2. The case of the petitioner is that basing on the teport aide Lr. No.B/399 /2024 d,ated 17-12-2024 said to have been submitted by respondent No.4 - the Tahasildar, Bommalaramaram Mandal' to respondentNol3--theRevenueDivisionalOfficer,Bhuvanagiri Divisiory resPondent No.8 aPproached respondent No'7 - the Sub-Registrar, Bhuvanagiri, for execution of rectification deed for correcting the entries in the subject land. , I

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that excePt the comPetent civil Court, neither the revenue authorities nor respondent No'7 have any I I 2 power or au tl- ority to carry out corrections of survoy numbers or boundaries ri lre schedule property of a sale der:d/c onv,:vance deed and the correlt ons ought not to have been carried out in the grft deed basing on th,: rr port submitted by respondent No.4

4. As the pe :itioner is having efficacious and alternativl lemedy for cancellation r,f the sale/gift/ rectification deed by insti h rting a suit before the corr-r )etent Civil Cour! this Court deems it aporopriate to dispose of ttr€' r, rit petitiory granting liberty to thr: petitioner to file a suit seekirlg c,rr:ellation of rectification deed bearing c1c,cu ment No.5g of 2025 datel 03.01.2025. In the event of filing of such suit, the concerne,l (:rurt shall decide the matter on its cwr rnerits without being influencc.r by the report sent by respondent No.4 to respondent No.3 oide Lr. \ct 8/399/2024 dated17.12.2024.

5. With tlrr: I bove observatiory this writ petition is d isposed of. There shall be'rrr order as to costs. As a ser1.rc. thereto, miscellaneous applications, if arry, pending in this writ petit,c,tr s;tand closed. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Princip)al :iecretary Department of Reven Telangana. SD/.. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SEC'IION OFFICER ue At Secretariat, State Of I J

2. The District ()o lector, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri Diskict. 3. The Revenu: Divisional Officer, Bhuvanagiri Division, ya d a dri-B huvanagiri District. \ t cNl 7 \ 4 5 6 7 8 o At Bommalaramaram Village' Mandal, At Bommalaramaram \ The Tahsildar, Bommalaramaram Mandal' Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District' The Mandal Surveyor, Bommalaramaram Viifage, VaOaari-Bhuvanagiri District' The Revenue lnspector, Bommalaramaram Mandal' At Bommalaramaram Viifage, VaOaOri-Bhuvanagiri District' The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office' At Bhuvanagiri' One CC to SRI RAVINDER REDDY MUPPU' Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

10. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP HIGH COURI' DATED: 0310212025 I I ORDER WP.No.2936 ,rf 2025 t, , , '\ (^i . o f t- 21 flrY 2it25 2 g;.r,11grE , t ::, DISPOSING ()F THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT CC STS \> 'u-