High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to isque a Writ Order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus ...RESPONDENTS i E.tr ,L !' i* a 1:. l :, 1 declaring th e au;1ion of the respondents in trying to la,y 33 KV High rension line across the lanrl cf the Petitioner in sy.No.'|74lJ to arr extent rrf Ac.015 gts and sy No.174lti to irrr extent of Ac. 0.16 gts. totar extent of Ac rl 3.r gts, which is single compa,:t ernd situated abutting Narsanapally 60 feet roar: , patha Rajampet Village, KanrareJcy Mandar anQ District without folowing due pr,cedure as iflegar, arbitrary and lrrr r:r:nstitutiqnal and violation of principles cf nratural justice and violation Art. 14 19, 21 and gg0-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respon(lents no! ray./qreqt 33-KV High rension rine across of the rand of the Petrtione r. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petitic,n unrler SecJion'!51 CPC praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit {ilecr irr 6uppgd of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Responclenrr; r.rot to lay Q3 KV High rension rine across the rand of the Petitioner in S,y \c. 1741_3 lo an elitent of Ac.O15 gts and Sy No 174lH to an extent of Ac ( 16 gts. tgtpl e.{ten! gf Ac. 0.31 gts, which is sin,:tte compact land srtuated abutting t,larsanapalllZ 60 {eet road, patha Rajampet Viltage, Kamareddy tvlandal and Drst.ict Counsel for the t)':titioner; SBI G. SUNDARESAN Counsel for the Flespondent l-{o.1: Cp FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Ftespondent ifos.2 to S: SRI A. CHANDRA SHAI.(ER, SC Counsel for the Flespondent |los.6 to g: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for ther Re,spondgnt No.9: cp FOR ROAD AND BUil_DI$G The Court made the following: ORqEn I,t: I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 1996 of2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is frled seeking the fotlowing relief: '...to issue a Writ Order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trylng to lay 33 KV Fligh Tension line across the land of the pJtiti"oner irl. Sy.No. l74lJ to total extent of Ac'O15 gts and Sy No' O 31 gts' l74lH to an ixtent of Ac. 0.16 gts' total cxtent o[ Ac *fri.t ;" single compact situated abutting Narasnapally 60 feet io"a, p"tfr" -n"jampet Village, Kamareddy Mandat and District without following due procedure as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionaf ;nd uiol^iiott of principles of natural justice and violation Art. 14, 16, 21 and 30O A of the Constitution of [ndia uoJ lorr""qr..rt1y direct the respondents not lay/erect 33-KV High Tension lini across of the land o[ the Petitioner and pass - " .

2. Heard Sri G. Sundaresan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri A. Chandra Shaker, learncd Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5. t earned counsel for the pctitioncr submits that the petitioner is 3. the absolute owner and possessor of the Iand in Sy Nos 174 /J and 174/H, situated at Patha Rajampct Viltage, Kamareddy Mandal and District, admeasuring an exl-ent oi Ac.O 15 gts ' arrd Ac.O.16 gts., respectivcly, totaling an extenL of Ac-0-31 While cnjoying the peaceful possession of the subject land, rcspondents started 2 PK, J t{. } No. 1996 of 2025 l.jub Station, laying 3I t{\, High Tension Line from 22O / 71\2 til KamareCctl, t,) the Sub Station at Narsanapally 50 ft. ro ad. Though the responrlerts initially planned to lay the poles alorgsi.ic the 6O ft. road, tl e;. ,: tanged the aJignment aIld are tryjng -o l: .y the High Tension Lirr,_- ,hrough the subject lald of the petiti,rner However, despite rePr,:r.r:d requests of the petitioner to lay the electr.icity line as pcr thc tnllir etl plan, the respondents did not heed tr: lris request. Therefor-r:. lt.a -ned counsel for the petitioner prays this Cc urt to pass ncccssar,y' , )rrl)-s in the present writ petition.

4. Le: ntcrl I jtanding Counsel for respondent Nos.2 o l. rciteratins the avcrntenr s ,tf the counter alfidavit, submits that firc p cposecl 33 K\/ I{igh Ji'rr;rcn Line is not passing/going through thr: lanrl. an I lll rI the petitioner, on mere appreherLsior and on lmagrnatr()n th;r the proposed Line may go through his l:rn,.l, rvithout kno*ing th(. :.(.tual facts or enquiring about the same ha,l fllcd the prescnt w-rt le tition. Therefore, it is prayed to dismrsrs [lre present lr,'r it pctiri. n )e tltioner's

5. Havinlt regard to the assertions made by the learned Standrng Counsel fo- lhi. r jspondents, the petitioner is not en-itleri l_,rr thc relief s.ught for ir .t: prcsent writ petition. However, in casc rht: land of l I !!! $ E F I t t E a E F : , t' i ! T. 3 PK' J w.P.No.1996 of 2O25 the petitioner is required for the purpose of laying High Tension Line' the respondents shall ensure that due process of law is followed'

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of' Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition' sharl stad closed' No costs' //TRUE COPY// sD/- N. sRrHARr DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 J 4 q 6 7 8 I 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 {4- TJ SS f, ! i I I t ,l i. *t* f s 1 t ,. HIGH COL'RT DATED:09111412025 \ \ \ ORDER WP.No.1995 of 2025 Ct ?'l ltr: ZW t-, t -l ,+ j DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C(]STS ..(("" 1-O \4r,]\ \ : i!:} t a