High Court · 2025

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS decraring the action of the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent in interfering and high handedly trying to dispossess the petitioner from Plot No.90 admeasuring an extent of 3oo sq yards in the land in sy No.165 and 166 situated at Sri Krishna Nagar, Kistareddypet Gram panchayat, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddy District on 21ro1t2o2s without issuing any prior notice and without obtaining any permission from this Hon,ble court and without assigning any reasons and without conducting any survey is irtegar, arbitrary, contrary to law and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation to the interim orders dated o1t10t2o24 in wp No.27126 of 2024 of this Hon,ble court and also in violation of Artictes 14,21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to not to demolish further and not to interfere with the possession from the subject property in prot No.90 admeasuring an extent of 300 sq yards in the land in Sy No.165 and 166 situated at sri Krishna Nagar, Kistareddypet Gram panchayat, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to not to further demorish the Ground Froor and not to interfere with the possession and not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property in Prot No.g0 admeasuring an extent of 300 sq yards in the rand in sy No'165 and 166 situated at Sri Krishna Nagar, Kistareddypet Gram panchayat, Ameenpur Mandal, sangareddy District, tiil disposar of the Wp No.22126 of 2024 and also pending disposal of the present Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.NARENDER REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondent No.2: sRr KATTKA RAVTNDER REDDY, sc FoR Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDY, SC FOR counset for the Respondent No.4: HYDRAA REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER ^"Yi8h i I I i i I I I I I I i 1 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN IIIRIT PETITION N0.1876 0F 2025 ORAL ORDER Heard Mr.G.Narender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No. 1, Mr.Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, Mr.putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.4.

2. It is the specific case of the petitioner herein that though this Court vide Order dated OI.LO.2O24 in W.P.No.27126 of 2O24 direcred the parties to maintain Status quo wit}:^ regard to the subject property in all respects, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are tr_r,ing to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property in violation of the said order. From 2L.OI.2025, they are clearing the debris and trying to take the posseEsion of the subject propertv by dispossessing him from t the sudject property. 2

3. Whereas, Mr.Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned Starding Counsel for respondent No.2 has produced written instructions of respondent No.2 stating that after demolition, respondent No.2 has received several complaints from the residents of the said locality alleging that the debris is causing inconvenience and requested respondent No.2 to clear the same. Therefore, respondent No.2 1S clearing the debris and it never tried to dispossess the petitioner as alleged in the writ alfrdavit. The said written instrlrctions are placed on record.

4. As discussed supra, W.P.No.27726 ol 2024 is pending. Vide Order, dated 01.1O.2O24, thris Court directed both the parties to maintain Status quo in respect o[ t]-re subject property in all respects. If respondent Nos.2 and 3 violated the said order, the petitioner has to file contempt case or file application seeking modification of the said order. Instead of doing so, he has frled the present writ petition. However, according to respondent No.2, it is only clearing the debris, it never tried to dispossess the petitioner herein. 3 \

5. In the light of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to respondent No.2 to clear the debris and not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. Petitioner is directed not to oppose respondent No.2 in clearing debris. However, both parties shall maintain Stafus- quo with regard to the subject property in all respects, as directed by this Court vide Order, dated Ol .1O.2O24 irr W.P.No.27126 of 2024. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. SDi-P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ANT REGISTRAR ASSI //TRUE COPY// cflo N OFFICER To A'd;; istration and u rba n Development'- Hvderabad

1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administlation.and Uban Development " o."r.tri,fit Dr. B.R. einUeatai retangana state Secretariat Buildings, 2. t*;H;i;h;;tr;i"iff Hvilerabad, State of Telangana Disaster Response aio"nd."i p.i"ition Agency (HYDRAA)' Hyderabad' Telangana 3. The Commissioner, Ameenpur Municipality' Ameenpur' Sangareddy District i. tii; i;h.liAii, Amtienpur tviandal, sansarbddv District' TS d: o"; bb*t65iic.run{eruoEn REDDY, 4d)i9.c9!9 toPUCl 6. Two CCs to Gp ron'iltb"1"Aij171'i1*a unanN Dev, Hign bourt for the State 7. iG-cc; toGp rdn-iEVErlriE, Hign court for the state of Telansana' at P u cI a. iji'l"bt ii s hr xn' -rr xn RAVI N D E R R E D DY-, s c- F o R HYDRAA .Lq 5: il; cc i;sRi punA'rnislrln Reoov, sc FoR MPCL [oPUC] 10.Two CD CoPies of Telangana, at HYderabad. [OUT] Hvderabad. IOUTJ PSK. BSK (fi- HIGH COURT DATED:2310112025 ORDER WP.No.1876 ot 2025 :( ,J .-,='--::- /a :-a( ). 0 5 ii liiii f)i1,,.,.,.., 1: {r ! I I I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @kp:-