The High Court · 2025

1. SMT. A.ALIVELAMMA, Wo.Late A,Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 80 years, Occ.. Housewife, R/o.Villa No.4'1 , Lumbini SLN Springs, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. SRl. A.VENKATRAM REDDY, S/o.Late A.Narasimha Reddv. Aoed about 58 years, Occ. Professor, R/o.Villa No.41, Lumbini SLN Springsl Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Temporarily resident at USA. 3. SRl. A.VENKATESWAR REDDY, S/o Late A.Narasimha Reddv. Aoed about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Villa No 41, Lumbini SLN Spdngi, Gichibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,

4. SMT. C.RAJITHA REDDY, Wo C.Jeevan Reddy, D/o.Late A.Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Medical Practitioner, R/o.Villa No.41, lympini SLN Springs, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. (Petitioners 1 , 2 and 4 arc represented by their General-Power o:f Attomey Holder SRI.A.VENKATESWAR REDDY S/o.Late A.Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Villa No.41, Lumbini SLN Springs, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District).

5. SMT.V.KOUSAYLA DEVI, W/o. Late A.Raghuma Reddy, Aged about 68 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Plot No 1 . Anjireddy Colony, Karmanghat, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distnct.

6. SRI.V.VDAY B REDDY, S/o Late Raghuma Reddy, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Employee, R/o.2068, Quret Cove Sanford, Florida, USA.

7. SRI.V.RAVI BHASKAR REDDY, S/o.Late V Raghuma Reddy, Ag,ed about 45 )rears, Occ. Employee, Presently residing at 8025, Tangelo Drive, Boynton Beach, Florida, USA. L SMT.RAJANI NALLA, Wo Suman Nalla, D/o.Late V Raghuma Reddy, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Medical Practitioner Presently residing at 727 Chateaus Drive, Coppell, Texas, USA. Petitioners 6 to 8 are represented by their General Power of Attorney Holder SMT V.KOUSAYLA DEVI Wlo. Late A.Raghuma Reddy, Aged about 68 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.Plot No.1, Anjireddy Colony, Karmanghat, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS // AND 2

1. MAHENDER AGARWAL, S/o. Late Om Prakash, Age j about 53 years, Occ Business, R/o. Plot Nos.104 and 105, Trimurthy Coope ative Society, Mahendra Hills, llnd Venture, East Maredpally, Secunc )rabad.

2. A.NARASIMHA REDDY (Died per LRs), 3. V.Raghuma reddy (Died per LRs), (Respondent Nos l rrrd 3 as made proforma Partys) ,..RESPONDENTS lA NO: 4 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th() c:ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cct 1 nray be pleased To permit the Attorney i.e., A.VENKATESWAR REDDY to prcr -.cute the above case by all means on behalf of Petitioners/Revision Petitioner Nc ;. 1, 2 and 4. lA NO: 5 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL 1 rray be pteased To permit the Attorney i.e., V.KOUSAYLA DEVI to prosecute he above case by all means on behalf of Petitioners/Revision Petitioner Nos,6 to 3. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr, lircumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r t may be pteased To suspend the Orders Daled 23.11.2020 in E.A.No.67 of :,- 20 in E P No.145 of 2020 in O.S.No.239 of 't 998 on the file of Hon'ble Junir Civit Judge, Medak District at Sanga Reddy pending disposal of Civil Revision f etit on lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ) rc.rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r t may be pteased To grant leave to the PetitionerV Revision Petitioners to r3 the Civit Revision Petition against the Order Daled 23.11.2020 in E.A.No.67 rr 2Ct2O rn E P.No.'145 of 2020 in O.S.No.239 of 1998 on the file of Hon'ble Jun c - Crvit Juctge, Medak District at Sanga Reddy. Counsel for the Petitionerc: SRl. RESU MAHENDER Rt: )Dy Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI ZEESHAN AONAN Mr\ IMOOD ,/,/ // .// CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1z'.l F 2021 J Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the non e,onsidering of EA.(CFR No.14 of 2021) in EP.No.145 of 2020 on the file of the Prl. Junior civit Judge, at Sangareddy, wherein the court below refused to order the change of description (based on newly assigned Jurisdiction) of the Police Station in implementing the order of Police Protection. Between: MAHENDER AGARWAL, Son of late Om Prakash Agarwal, Aged about 57 vears. Occupation Business, Resident of Plot No. 1 04 and 105, Tirumurthy Co. bp. Sbciety,'Mehendra Hills, ll Venture, East Marredpally, Secunderabad ...PETITIONER ANO

1. A. NARSIMHA REDDY(Died), HYD 2. V. RAGHUMA REDDY, son ofV. Janga eddy, Aged about 77 yea$' Occupation. Service, resident of H. No.16-9-611, Old Malakpet, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 'f OF 2021 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the station House officer, Police station BDL Bhanur to provide Police protection in favour of the Revision Petitioner in respect of the subject Property i.e., land admeasuring Ac.5-12 Gts, in Sy.no 161/A, at Kardanaru Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak for implementation of the lnjunction orders passed in favour of the Revision Petitioner in A.s.No.28 0f 2003 as confirrned in S.A.No.734 of 2004. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAo NANDIKONDA CTVIL REVISION PEf,ITION l{os.197 6r L2L of 2O2L COMMON ORI)ER: When the matter is taken up for heari:t g, learned counsel for the respondents in C.R.p.No.t9T of 2O2L wlno is appearing on behalf of the petitioner in C.R.p.No.L2l tf 2O2L appeared virtually and submitted t].at both the rev.r io, petitions will become infructuous on ttre ground that tl.e :x€'cution petition itself was closed by way of the compromise ar cl learned counsel appearing on the other side also submits the r;, Lmr:.

2. Recording the aforesaid submissions o both the learned counsel, these revision petitions are dismiss: i as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petifions, per dirrg if trny, shall stand closed. SD/- A. I ,REENIVASA REODY ASS ISTANT REGIS \'i--*.-- \'SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Medak District at Sar gareddy 2 OneCCto SRl. RESU MAHENDER REDDyAdvocak: OpUCI 3 OneCCto SRI ZEESHANADNAN MAHMOODAdvocz tetOpUCl 4 Two CD Copies .TPK/ABK HIGH COURT DATED:1411012025 COMMON ORDER CRP.No.197 of 2021 AND CRP.No.121 of 2021 a'-. { /.,'<;i+\)o C) ,- HES i rRi 2t t(E t< \. :,S,)ATCI-I CIUL REVISION PETITIONS AFI= DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS u