The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in F l.R No. 357 of 2024 on the file of the Regonda Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and ^ proper in the circumstances of the case. l-A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in F.l.R No- 357 ot 2024 on the file of the Regonda Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Smt. Karre Swapna, Wo. Rakesh, aged about 34 years, Occ. Housewife. R/o Venkateswarlapally Village, Regonda Mandal, Jayishankar, Bhupalpalty District ...Petitioner / Respondent No 2 in l.A.No.3 & 4 of 2025 AND '1. Karre Rakesh. S/o. Adaiah aged about 44 years, Occ. Business 2. Smt. Karre Samrajyam, Wo Adaiah, aged About 66 years, Occ. Household Both are R/o Plot No. 42, Praneet Pranav Meadows, BVowrampet, Medchal Malkajgiri District

3. The State of Telangana, through S.H.O. Reqonda police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, Rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad ** l,;' llffn?i:.' [T':'ilfr; "' Res pond ent,1Xi,T. i ['itl]Brl Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirhinal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to compound the offence U/Sec. g5 of B.N.S. and Sec. 3 and 4 of D.P. Act and to quash the proceedings in F.l.R No. 357 ot 2024 on the lile of the Regonda Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise and to quash the proceedings in F,l.R No. 357 ot 2024 on the file of the Regonda police station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K Shrikanth, Advocate for the Petitioners and Ms S Maffivi, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Rohith Kumar Sattu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following Order : I I I I THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 1n and CRIMINAL PETITION No.878 of 2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is liled under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short tsNSS) by the petitior-rers/ accused Nos.1 and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in F.I.R.No.357 of 2024 on the file of Regonda Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. The offences alleged against petitioners are under Section 85 of BharatiyeL Nvaya Sanhita (for short 'BNS') and Sections 3 and 4 of Do,.vry Prohibition Act (for short 'DP Act').

2. Hearcl Mr. K. Shrikanth, learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Rohith Kumar Sattu, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Ms. S. Madhavi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State. I)erused the material on re t:ord.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel(s) appearing for petitioners arlcl o:grondent No.2, that during pendency of present Criminal Petition, parties have _expressed willingness ...,, t i 2 JAK, J CRLP 878 2025 to compromise the matter and compromised. I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are filed to record and permit compromise of the matter between parties. I.A.Nos.3 and 4 are ordered.

4. A Joint Memo is alnexed along with I.A.No.4 of 2025, wherein it is stated as follows: "It is submitted that during the pendency of the above said case, at the intervention of the elders ald well-wishers and more patticularly keeping in view of the bright future of the children, the matter has been amicably settled and the petitioner and 2"d respondent herein have decided to stay together and lead happy marital life along with their children and the 2"a respondent has agreed to withdraw the said case and pendency of the said case would create hurdies in their marital life. In view of the said settlement, no purpose would be served in continuing the above proceedings."

5. Having perused the Joint Memo, this Court queried the counsel(s) for both parties ald learned counsels stated across the Bar that they received instructions from petitioners/ accused Nos.1 and 2 and respondent No.2 parties that they have been living together under the same roof and settled the differences and disputes amicably on the advice of elders. That, there is no necessity for further adjudication in the matter. 3 JAt(i CRLP 878 2025

6. A report is filed by High Court Legal Services Committee that accused Nos.1 ald 2 and respondent No'2 were duly identified in presence of their counsels and both parties willfully, without coercion entered into compromise. 7 . In vie'*. of the submissions made across the Bar, Joint Memo filed (annexed along with I.A.No.4 of 20241, report of I the High Court Legal Services Committee, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders need to be passed in this matter.

8. Needless to state that in view of the compromise between parties, this criminal petition stands allowed and proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 in F.I.R.No.357 of 2024 on the file of Regonda Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha-Il stand closed. Sd/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA AS STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 The Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Bhupalapally The Station House Officer, Regonda PS, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana' Hyderabad [OUT] I

4. One CC to Sri K Shrikanth, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Cooies ; ;;; czl"6f. pohoh |<..m.v S"$u, A\pc!"+€ copJ() - [ Along with the Copy of the Joint Memo of Compromise ] VA/gh lX- I HIGH COUR'T DATED:1 010?-12025 ORDER I.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 in / and CRLP.No.878 ol 2025 SErt TA 14: *o o () 16 APfl Nffi a i , o ES t'alCY\ t ALLOWING THE CRLP AND !.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 a .od4 &r. 0 iN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. ---- ,of 2025 Against FIR No. 3St of 2024 (on the file of the Regonda police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District) Between: 1) Karre Rakesh s/o Adaiah aged about 44 years, occ: Business, 2) Smt. Karre Samrajyam w/o Adaiah, aged About 66 years, occ: Household Both are r/o Plot No. 42, praneet pranav Meadows, Bvowrampet, Medchal Malkajgiri District. 1) The State oiTulangunu, through S.H.O., Regonda Poliie Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, rep. By public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. ..Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1&2 2) Smt. Karre Swapna w/o Rakesh, aged about years, occ: Housewife, r/o Venkateswarlapally t .3-4. Village, Regonda Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. ..Respondents/Complainant loI ME LED BY THE E NDR NDE 1) It is submitted that the 2nd respondent herein lodged a compraint on 18-12-2024 stating that she was harassed by her husband and mother-in-raw i.e., the petitioners herein for additionar dowry. Basing on the said compraint, the police registered a case in FIR No. 357 of 2024 *' -2- 2) It is submitted that during the pendEi"cy of the above said case, at the intervention of the erders and weil-wishers and more particurarry keeping in view of the bright future of the chirdren, the matter has been amicabry settred and the petitioner and the 2nd respondent herein have decided to stay together and lead happy marital life along with their children and the 2nd respondent has agreed to withdraw the said case and pendency of the said case wourd create hurdres in their maritar rife. In view of the said setue no purpose would be served in continuing the above proceedings. nt, 3) in view of the above it is prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in F.I.R No. 357 of 2024 on the file of the Regonda police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, in the interest of justice v- COU NSEL FOR PETMONERS ,'t<'SrhtX"r P ONERS (\-"\u uL- COUNSEL FOR RES.NO.2 RESPONDENT NO.2 er H. r.tr)&r"/ '-