Shri Kolan Ravinder Reddy, Sio Late Sri. Kolan Venkata Reddy v. The Joint Commissioner of Central Tax
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
gly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
M/s. Upakar lnfra Projects Pvt Ltd, 6-3-34712211012, Saiville. Ap-artments' Dwarkapuri Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana- q00 9q2 Rqp.. by its Managing Directoi, Shri Kola-n.Ravinder Reddy Sio Late Sri. Kolan Venkata Reddy, aged about 63 years, Rl/o 8-2-293l82tFlilN7, 1st Floor, Skatos Apartments,.Road No. 5, Film Nagar Cooperative Housing Society, Shaikpet, Hyderabad- 500 033 ...PETITIONER AND 'l . The Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad GST Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, L B Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad- 500 004 2. fhe Principal Commissioner of Central . Tax,- Hyderabad . GST Commission6rate, GST Bhavan, L B Stadium Road, Basheerlcagh, Hyderabad- 500 004
Union of lndia, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Rep by its Principal Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more specifically one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to Quash the order in original No. 155/ GSTl2O24-25- Adjn. (JC)-HYD-GST dated 25.10.2024, passed by the Respondent No. 1' ', t:.a- .:*' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more specifically one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to Quash the Order in Original No. 155/GST/202a-25-Adin. (JC)- HYD-GST dated 25.10.2024, passed by the Respondent No.1. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI CHUNAP ANVESH KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: M/s. DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF INDIA WRIT PETITION NO: 3174OF 2025 Between: Shri Kolan Ravinder Reddy, Sio Late Sri. Kolan Venkata Reddy, aged about 63 years, No 8-2-293l12lFlllN7, 1st Floor, Stratos Apartments, Road No. 5, Film Nagar Cooperative Housing Society, Shaikpet, Hyderabad- 500 033 ...PETITIONER AND
The Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad GST Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, L B Stadium Road, Basheeibagh, Hyderabad- 500 004
fhe Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad GST Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, L B Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad- 500 004
3. Union of lndia, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Rep by its Principal Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more specifically one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to Quash the Order in Original No. 155/ GST/2024-25-Adjn. (JC)-HYD-GST dated 25t10t2024, passed by the Respondent No.1. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay operation of the Order dated 25t10t2024 passed by Respondent No.1 till the disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. FOR SRI CHUNAP ANVESH KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No.'t & 2: M/s. DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF INDlA The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 1 I THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTTCE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA IVRIT PETITTON Nos.317O and,3174 of 2O2S COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the Acting ChieJ-Justtce Sujog paul) Sri M.S. Srinivasa Iyengar, learned Senior Counsel appearing fo. Sri chunap Anvesh Kiran, lea, red counsel for the petitioners, sr:eks to withdraw these writ petitions with the liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy of appeal. He prays that some time lirrLit may be fixed for fiiing the appezrl.
2. The other side has no objection.
Operative part
3. Accordi.gly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn by reserving the liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal. If the appeal is prei'erred within fifteen days from today, th e appellate authority shall not dismiss it on the ground of dela-rr and shalt decide it on merits in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stald closed \ To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. IS MAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR l\ I l\ Secr ION OFFICER 1 2 3 4 One CC to SRt CHUNAP ANVESH K|RAN, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/s. DOMTNIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC tOpUCI 3p:^,","il:-:#3f;1ff fl y:i:l5yy3,*i"i?Tl,?3,:311o,5,o,.4.*'o, Two CD Copier; BS BS HIGH COURT DATED: 1010212025 ,t COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.3170 and 3174 of 2025 t?r ( e i o HE 9I4 l4: 1 i t'tAB 2fl25 -^' * €.9r.,",r 6.*i --=-- i:- J DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS I I I I
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: gly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Constitution of India.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.