High Court · 2025

3. KAKI JAGADESH MUDIRAJ, S/o. Kaki Srinivas ttly-{!*j, Age-.30 Years' - lbrahimpatnam Occu--ngri"rttrre, FVo. H.Nb-3-36, Kongarakalg! fvfinOat, Hanga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510' -V]|]age, ' 4'KAKILAVANYA'Wo.KakiJanardhan,Age.48Years,occu-Agriculture, nyo. +-Ag, fongaraialan Village, lbrahinipatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 5015'10.

5. KAKI SHIVA SAIKIRAN, S/o. Kaki Janardhan, Ag9- 26. Years.' Occu- Agriculture,Fl/o.4-S3,Kongarakalan-Village,lbrahimpatnamManoal'Kanga R6ddy District, Telangana State - 50'1510. - 6.KAKIYASHoDA,W/o.LateKakiSriramulu,Age-70Years,occu-House i,tiid, Ryd. 6_48, rongi.akiiin vitiug", iurahtmpitnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510. T.KAKIRAJU,S/o-LateKakiSriramulu'Age.4SYears,occu-Agriculture,Fl/o. 6-4ti: (ongirahran Vitlagu, lbrahimpatiam Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' Telangana State - 5015'10' " S.KAKIBHooPAL,S/o.KakiJangaiah,Age-73Years,occu-Agriculture,R/o. b_id; (on-slrakiian virrJse- toahimbatiam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510.

9. KAKI SRIHARI, S/o. Late Kaki Jangaiah, Age- 73 Years, Occu- Agriculture, - Ry;. o-+8, Kohgararirin vittage, -lbrahim[atnam Mandal' Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510. lO.KAKI sHlvA SHANKER, S/o. Kaki srihari, Age- 46 Years, occl- Agriculture' - R/o. o-aa, rong"tuk;rln Viriag", lbrahimpltnam Mandal' Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510

11.KAKI HARI KlsHAN, S/o. Kaki Narsimha, Age- 57 Years, occu- Agriculture, F ;.- o-%, kongaratuiu" Viriag"' lbrahimfatnam t\Iandal' Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510. '- b:i;: kongir;krr"n Viriag",-rOianimpalnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, l2.KAK|SUDHA,Wo.KakiKeshavulu,Age-52-Years'Occu-Agriculture.'llo' Telangana State - 501510. "m',?5"Ti5i,?i:ffi i!.f "'ifi!fi tt!:ri&,fi "3ii!;tiiillj*fl i Telangani State - sotSto. (Petitioner No.1 to 13 are represented by Petitioher No.14 Power of Aftorney holder)

14.KATAR| VENKATA RAYAPA RAJU, S/o. Katari Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, Aged about 60 years, Occ- Business, R/o. Villa NoJ 5, Jayab^he^ri, The M-eadows, Gachib'owli, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State -500032. .....PETITIONERS AND 't. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Reventre Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Ranga Reddy. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Land Reforms Tribunal, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. Ranga Reddy. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Oourt may be pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not disposing the Review application File No. 8,1188712024 daled 2610912O24 liled under section 9- A of Telangana Land Reforms (COAH) Act, 1973 as illegal, arbitrar'1 and contrary to law apart from violations of Principles of natural justice besides violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the Review Petition in terms of its earlier orders in F. No.L179412020 and in F. No. L179712020. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the Review Petition in terms of its earlier orders in F. No. 1179412020 and in F. No. Ll797l2O2O, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI B.VAMSHIDHAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER Y HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY ORDER WRIT PETITION No.1818 of2o25 This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the .action of respondent No.3 in not disposing of the Review Application in File No.Bl1887/2024, dated 26.09.2024 fited under Section 9-A of the Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, ),973 (for short "the Acr, 1973,,) as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 2l and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and consequently prayed lor other appropriate reliefs.

2. It is stated that the petitioners are the lineal descendents of the protected tenants and their predecessors' names have been recorded as protected tenants as per the provisions of the Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. It is further stated that the pattadar, suppiessing the fact of the rights of the protected tenants, has surrendered the land admeasuring Acs. 19.OO guntas situated in Sy.Nos.28l , 282 and 283, situated at Kongarakalan Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under the provisions of the Act, 1973 and the Land Reforms Tribunal had issued common orders in File Nos.CC.No.3373/1175,3374/1175 and 3396/ l/75 and when it 2 CVBR, J wp l8l8 2025 has come 1.o their notice, they filed an application sr:eking to review the aforesaid orders. The grievance of t1-re petir,ioners is that even after receiving the said review applicalion, the respondent authorities have not passed any orders.

3. Considered the submissions of the learned couns,:l for [he respecti\re parties and with their consent, this writ pr:[ition is dispose ol at rhe admission stage.

1. Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri B.Vamshidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners htrs vehemently contended that even thor.rgh said Revierv Application has been taken on file on 26.09.2021, so far respondent No.3 has not initiated any proceedings for conducting cnquiry in terms of the Act, 1973.

5. ln vieu' of the above submissions, this Court, without expressing :rry opinion on the right and entitlemenr of the petitioners an,l since it is stated that the petitioners hr,Lve fileC Review Applrcirtion in File No.B/ t88T 12024, dated 26.Ct9.2024, deems it appropriate to dispcse of this writ petition directing respondent No.3 to examine the said Review Applicatton and decide the same in accordance r.,,.ith the provisions of rhe Act, 1973 after issuing notice to all the persons intere:;ted as 3 CVBR. J wp- 1818_2025 expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four (08) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/- T.TTRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGIST / E TION OFFICER To 't. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at HYderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Ranga Reddy' 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Land Reforms Tribunal, lbrahimpatnam' Ranga Reddy District. Ranga Reddy. +. Two-CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to SRI B.VAMSHIDHAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies SA s ) :\ .S rA IO- tHE c ^q- g 1t ir:B zofli * f);:t' ^ - " ,. HIGH COURT DATED:2310112025 ORDER WP.No.1818 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. e)q'' 7K