Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 12th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION 16010 OF 2008 12th August, 2008.
Judgment
Cause title
Smt. Amara Bhasker Rao, W/o. Late Bhasker Rao, in the Premises of I.A.S.E., Masab Tank, Hyderabad. AND ..... PETITIONER
1 Government Institute Advanced Studies in Education, Rep. by its Principal, Welfare Centre, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 Mr. Jagdish, S/o.Not Known to the Petitioner, Government Institute Advanced Studies in Education, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 Aleem, S/o.Not Known to the Petitioner, Government Institute Advanced Studies in Education, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in trying to evict the petitioner through proceedings Rc.No. 1/Spl/B/2007 dated 19-6-2008 directing the petitioner to vacate the premises as illegal, arbitrary, intentional, malafide, without authority and without following due process of law and consequently set-aside the impugned proceedings Rc.No. 1/Spl/B/2007 dated 19-6-2008 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION 16010 OF 2008
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 12th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION 16010 OF 2008 12th August, 2008.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.