1- Smt.Rajeshri v. APPEAL SUIT No.539 of 2O18

Judgment

The present appeal is frled against the preliminar5r decree dated 30.06.2017 passed in O.S. No. 46 of 2O1l by the II Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Medak at

Sangareddy. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court passed the preliminar5r decree for partition and separate possession of the A and B schedule properties. 2 Heard Sri Meherchand Mori, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S.R.Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. During the pendency of the appeal, it was brought to the notice of ttris Court that the parties have entered into compromise and I.A. No. 2 of 2025 to that effect was frled. In the light of the a-foresaid, this Court, uide order dated 27.03.2025, has directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, for their identification. In compliance thereof, the parties have appeared before the Secretar5l, Telangana High Court Legal Services \ \ 2 51(s,J r^ NL 2 of2o2s IN/AND aPPE^L sarf No_$e ot 2013 Committee, who has submitted a report dated 27.O3.2O25 to this Court recording the compromise between the parties.

4. In the compromise, it has been stated that due to the intervention of the well wishers of both the parties, the parties have compromised the dispute with following terms: "The respondent/Smt. Vijaga agreed to relinquish all her rights tn the srult schedule propertg granted in tLLe preliminary decree doted 3O.O6.2017 in O.S. No. 46 of 2O11 on the ftle of the Court of the II Additionat Dbtrtct Judge (Fast Track Court), Medak at Sangareddy, on receipt of the benefits bg taking the monetarilg benefits from appellant No.2/Sri. Rahul Deshmukh. She also agreed to set aside the preliminary d_ecree and pa.ss a fresh decree in lerms of lhe compromise. Compromi.se hos been agreed u.tith appetlant No,2/Sri. Rahul Deshmukh to ma.ke a pagngnt of Rs.2O lakhs i.e., Rs.2 lakhs on 31.05.2O25; Rs.6 lakh.s on

31.12.2025; Rs.6 lakhs on 31.12.2O26 and Rs.6 lakls on 31.12.2027 vide post dated cheques bearing Nos.00OO67, 000068, OOOO69 and 000070." (Emphasis Supplied)

5. Having regard to the setflement arrived at between the parties, the I.A. is ordered. In such circumstances, this Court 3 SKS,J r.L No. 2 of 2o2s WJA]ID APPF.AL sUIT do.539 of2ol8 deems it appropriate to dispose of the appeal in terms of the memorartdum of comPromise. Accordingly, A.S. No. 539 of 2018 is allowed and suit i'e'' 6. O.S. No. 46 of 2Ol1 is decreed in terms o-f the compromise entered between the parties. Consequently, the preliminary decree dated 30.06.2017 passed in O'S' No' 46 of 2011 by the II Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Medak at Sangareddy, is herebY set aside. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ot4,,,,,* 1. The ll Additional Diskict Judge (Fast Track Court) Medak at Sanga Reddy //TRUE COPY// SECTI To, (with records, if anY) Z. bne CC to Sri Meherchand Nori, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri S.R. Deshmukh, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies (Along with a Copy of Memorandum of Compromise) Kam,? SL HIGH COURT DATED:01 10412025 COMMON JUDGMENT+COMPROMISE DECREE l.A.No.2 of 2025 IN/AND AS.No.539 of 2018 -iHE"S R 2 .,r ,tult 2525 ,n 'rf' ,(, :h [ 3385 ] THE APPEAL SUIT AND l.A.No.2 o12025 ARE ALLOWED 6 a{ i.-: Y i I l 1 L] 1 N rlr, n,G*,cou*r tg;ffi;S' oF TELANGANA: Ar ' I.A.NO. A:S.NO' oE 2)25 oF 2018 N 539' BeNveen: t'u"mgeshmukh' ' '1,,, *;I'ffif*l*t,ffi A PPELLANT' "*,Rs AND :f;1f;,}iif[##r# RES' oNDENr,Rr spoNDENr \ SE ITI S o CoF o D

1. It is submitted that the reslondent herein filed a suit i .e. O'S.No' 46 District Judge (Fast Track Court)' of 2011 on the file of the II Addl lvledah at Sanga ReddY seeking to Pass a preliminary decr ee for Partitron beNveen her and d B schedul e ProPerties and separate possession of A an ants herein) and to aPPoint an Advocate the defendants I arrd} (APPell d B schedule on and seParation of A an ical Partiti Commissioner for PhYs S*.*,. V*\'}P> R g""-n @)* -rj--,& j I : I properties with metes aod borrrrrt" n^A ^tt . , ,^-t final decree. bounds and al1ot 7/3'd share to her by passing a ji"

2. I submit thar in the sr B properties u." uoro,u,."'' Deshmukh. Her father death of her father, both properti es and are "r, "r,,i" share in the property, rhe defenrl,^r" _:^_,'l she filed the suit. the plaintiffclaims that the schedule A and ; properties of her Iate father srinivas Rao died intestate, She also claims that after the *tfl :::,:;*H:,,ff T: j:;:: '^ "_"" lefendants refi.rsed for the same and as such 3. I submit that wc filcd written statement stating that I am the ltv35 p.s Deshmukh' As the said Srinivas Rao executing * o*r,,", ir""J"#T:: ;::fi:J ;;:rffi,T ::';:,::";::i;.""";'j'''"o her rarher n* o"nn adoptivc son of late Srin . Deshmukh has no male -by ",.o the properries ;.m:; **: i I JI:TT;j:.il:" l;" L,*.I:# away Ac 5 ro n.,,, *"1;1':'"::::::::,r" #:: yn: :"i vruc regrstered sare deed vide Doc.No.l6 72/rgg2dare, l <_no , ;*-:: 16-09-1992 and invested the sale proceeds for construction of house name oftheprarrro.nrrorl'r.Gowliguda" Hyderabad standing in the ;",,j:'ilTT;1::;T" ''''"'iffwas ,,TJ::J:#ffi ;lh'"il"H ; #.?:i;1' ;:l *: ;j enritred . *y,r,,." i, J;'H""fl,:T:i:T:;l:lT,l* arlotted with share during the {"; s*\/,,+",{{ A"j {\r.; r,[- ,,1 i 1i I i t I i i 1 I t i l I L I I I I i I alienration ol the tan! towards her share 1o others' *^*"" ffi; ;,r"or; r; j,"i;; ;:,.'ffi1.'iH;:;' ; .'. p.ffi"1 are falien to_ th such there are no ; *O U he plaintiff is not entitled for partition asPravef for' ,..,, Deshniukh had taken me Hindu 1id'{i "*""t'tittgili"udo"too by the plaintiff and deed on 26-05-1986'as'per ,''" tr'luo*o **ad stated above;'srinivirslRao in adoption by customs and the t'td o**""- D""d *u' 'u:tt": aft e'takihsadoption'"*1"'1""'"Y:T::-:T;::I'':r1;:: tuna in Sy'No'62 sittidted'at':Narayarikhed towrirds plaintiffs tn*" nid''*ing land Ac'8:!3lets and Dastagardan defendarrt No'l was Inarn land of Ac'25 '24Jsl* O"" r"r r'n'' not provided with-any ;;"' tin; hel son 2od defendantwairtaken adoptidn by their father Srinivas Rao Deshmukh' : 6. I submit that Srinivas Raq peshmukh died' leaving behind me as his adopted so,n' * *'"n'"*it""^odto hrs death' the 2"d dQfendant made an applicatign to the Revlnr e-'"""*1 oftrc+, Sangargd{y' for grant of oec*pancvt*t'"*"'in'"'peddi.:1):l"i;i".-"li:'ir",":; ;*n"* (sy'No'96) admspsuting LcZl24 lovn?pd*r".,*ivisi,onaro**tlt1n:T:T:f,"T1""1-:':" ir, ,r*"q thq finat nalta certiflcatg *'i"i ]:: preeeedings*"u^J'Lo-e6datedt":Il;:;T1i:T::::H: irrrr^*- of tt'q said certifrcate' my na{n9 was mL: ' by virhre of inheritance as adopted son' ' . '1 . I submit that the 2d defendant also made an application to mutation of suit schedule 'B' property ^Ets -s '' Narayankhed Grtrn '*"** "r s*" Vr@ Pe1";"'; @rW i I l I l l I i I l I I i by virtue of adoption deed and the Executive Officer, Narayankhed Gram Panchayat after giving notice to the praintiff and defendant No.1 _ mutaled his name as owrer of I he ".i,r of the said,grogerty in Gram panch4yat records vide proceedings No.l4912000 dated 07_03_2000 *A rnrtrtion '.ner 'i"r'i ", '';1r,' 1 .,'1. i"^' proceedings are well withir rhe kflowledge of plaintiffand I,r defendant.

8. 11 is submifled that the the appeal !];f sui'!,Q;s No'+o of 2011on the file *. Meds(atsansareddy,the,,,#li.iJ'ffi ::-J.[Tff ;*l ""'^"]::irn "a on 30-06-2017: 'iln the result, a pri:liminary decree is.passed a. O*ira, *O separate possession of the a anrt D ^^L^r. I praintiff is entitred,o..,nl"."1.To ;Jj;H #T:l::J:; to l/3'd share each in the A an.t R c^L-.r..r^ _, circumstances, no costs. rl ;'",";1".t*,T::T:,"j:jl; separate appl ication',. Aggrieved by the said .judgment and decree bf the court below we are preferred appear A'S'No'53g of 201g on the fi,e of this Hon,bte court. Aggrieved by the brder this Hon,ble Court passed the following order: "This is an application filed for stay :of pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 30_06_201g ; O.S.No.46 of 20l l on the file of II Additiorial District Judg.e,,@ast Track Couit), Medak at Sangareddy. The,suit iS filed for partition and a preliminary decree was granted under the i.pugn.O orU.r. There shali be stay of passing of the final decree alone. All otl.rer proceedings can continue,,. all rfuither proceedings ,: ..:..:. Srral (6{e}r,,1 I { l r i i \ \ \l 1l i 'l ,1 ,tl .l ^"r".u"", ftll"1t'.utiur'u' ' 'Iy gr'l"f"tl'" Srinivas Rao Destrnukh (my ' *i'o'" name was changed after the g ' It is lubmitld adopted rather) 'i:* y''}i, ffi, ;;,,t;" woi "huog"iti,.Y.:'I **iug" u. p"r M aharashl ;enr appeal fited a H;T;;: o,he.han Til:fr:ffij|,*iil**"ddy the said 'oJCtuiutioi't.for9 the La )n th" fri"'of t-*d ::;* ;; rq':l ;:il;ffi '.|ff ;;; l; n,,,,ru *" Reforms Tribunal' *i1]Lu"u the land holdings of my Adopliv" futt'"' land ieforms tribunl::"ii;;; o"*;; said order that *re eitts Srinivas'Rao Deshmukh' tt " "u.'"i.]l" .'), ., hereinl was aiso ,,".; 1" ;;",,.^-i"::"';,#il$1T:"*';: ;* * recorded *i:: |.i.::,:il; ;t:t No'3314ari75 the gift settrement defendant which -- ^Tu:';'""1u"'"'*"0 one as such *" *:o t*o-t^ deed given to the daug]- No'l who is the none holdings of the defendant :ffiffi,"'t*tl-#ffi' rt is also evident ftom the above '" T5;T":l:: I"':" -.",i"1,::-':: i:: JiH ff' daughters of Srinivas n-ao Oestrmu]i]t-11 on 17-12-1976 stating that as per filed objection p'"t'"'lnt '"n*utely ram*vsenlem;';;;;"';-"*l-""'i::::f i}"il':;l:I Dawoor (v) to pratibha and SvNos' t ,r, *" ;t*o'u'*o"u (v) to smt. 'O'* I'i;;:;;;;;'"lands and ; ;;' and since then *"''*: ]".1:-'::T; **'" ",."*..t ,"'"r"u,""_1;,f: ;:ilf,TTr:iJff;- theselands fro "';;;;;i*u; Irrtr'r w r"* - RO*.va @'Lt tf, S".."r. V / ,n ' orRDo' rnade hv t11",'"] subseguentll tne declarations 'n" of Covid Covid restrictions *t to p'odu"' mv *""t my declaration t"' mY mor1" Raieshri vx6 and the said appeal bv its the p59 '#, '*' 2020 i'e' iust before to aftcnd the'enquirv No 5l or tsso unoer onlv I was appriserl ";r;#, "ttnr "^;'r"rrl1hen r"'h"t tr,"Lou o, *";;; *'l'o -, o".r# *.r" Aggrieved by lhe sri.l ^_, fi led Land Reform]Y: * adortive fa* order dared , o_ , I ',p:^.^u' a* *".r, "a ;;;* *" *",rr*0. sangareddy *.r.0 1-''l' ,"r*n .r' , Covid, durins ,n. *::]:" -r. berore rhe *o, ,r^ll"o , with *r** ,;'in't rhe Land a.,,,n* o]i'Ydv 2022 t attended,n..,l;^ -t'l'o* "ll]"]";";RA bv rhe RDo .o"r" rlll" mv adoptive *,n", record in supporr "r,nll indicaring ,*, *,*;-'.'^l1l' records with me and a-111" orders as 0".,n. .."o.J1:'::':**o ;;;::il"'-e nor I have anv ro pass appropriate rhe said period I u.r", ,fL*ui''bre records and during the orders of rhe Land JII^r:. me a copv or rribunar. rhe appeuar" ,l:l*: Rerorms Appellate since r ry65 working ,rnl::r,or,n"rrn.'*rlid me a Xerox copy. , ;,;;:,.;, since r was 0,,",I1.:*r,* mv counsel in srate rhat on my visir ," r],'^l"n 'n, "oroun] ;;J" works I tunher about the s.,tus orrhe ",,1^l::*''' ^';;il';'r;t rhe orders orthe LRc ,rr;;::l- 0u.,..,", , o.',Jfii::r,:,:::; 10. I stare har I filed I., I of 202j in A.S.No. ttus Hon'bre 1" :*.,*,.#f *lI#,:* [::j,iy,[:: :: l.:J atong with the main t'l aflidavit -;:;a , tuafter ^ ffi^::",:::;-:;r:: wirh ;;;#:"' rr*"rr,* . ,]e rribunar ; ;;:''*'s j;1 appeal. The contents of thr rrus peririon. Ard ,n" ""*l,r* l,No rryderabad &!.r R f"u,-l j J, I I l I respog-d' ent the 11 It is submitted that during the'pen$ency of th9 appga'l for taking into consider4iign ofrelalioqshi;i*"u' '* apeuans ld elders and well-wishers p'i"l"a t'pon *1": ::-t{"i* :HT: thb'matter:tfie,t* *:, ,' : ' ".' ;;il,.;'idicordinglv ', .,.) lollowing tetins' .:., ' : Fonowing are, *" ."*l seftlemer-$ lentered '-!Y '* a*,. ttjura (ResPonden0 I l.' ffi'ilTfl:: J"*i: ;ilil*T, 'Smt ,-r, . , '- :' . , . :' aya agreed to relinquish all her riglrts tn 1. The respondent smt vijava *::: ;";;inary decree dated on the file of the-court of the II ""'-i' thesuitschedulep(opertygrantedinthenrelrmtnTT:.'.. 30.06-201? in o'S' No' ou Addl. Districr ludge, (Fast Track courr), Medak at Sangareddy, on receipt of the benefits O' t*"' *" monetarily benefits ftom Rahul t"i#:1 Deshmukh, ,'u unn""u"f i" uo". "T""1^t:" :l: a rresh decree rn decree and :ass ;;;;; compromlse' Lr'l I I

2. compromise n* o"* .",n;:.;,H15;ffrffiT:; paYment of rRs' 20 Lakhr lollows: no' 000067 0523161002279

3. Rs. 2 Lakhs on 31st Mav 2025 vide eostla:d of HDFC Bank ", "1""* "'oer 4. Rs. 6 Lakhs on 31st December 2025 vitle postdated cheque no' 000068 of account number 0523161002279 of HDFC BL*, theOue 1,b e4\ll \ s .ih#rF#

5. Rs. 6 Lakhs on 3lst December 2026 vide postdated cheque no. 000069 ofaccount number 0523161002279 ofHDFC Bank

6. Rs: 6 Lakhs on 3lst,December 2027 vidd postilat6d iheque no. 000070 of account number 0523 I 6 I 00 227 9 of HDF C Bank . For ,th9 l9.?son! stated abqve, it is therefore pp4yed that.this Honlble Court may be pleased to record the compromise by settir]g aside the preliminary -decree rendered in O.S. No. 46 of 2011 on the file of the court':of,the.:Il'Addl. District,Judge, (Fast Trdck. Corirt), Medak at Sangareddy:, and .ito lpass hn decree in terms ',of Meinorandum of compromise between the parties and pass such other order or otders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. . .1ti I fro7"^r"n' 2 APPELLANTS CO FO ELLANT 6*r^:' F1{r4,. RESPONDENT "r-^ilr COTINSEL FOR RESPONDENT IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA l.A.No.2 ot 2025 IN/AND APPEAL EUIT No: 539 of2018 Between:

1. Smt.Rajeshri, Wo.Ramesh Rao Deshmukh, Age:61 years, Occ:household, C/o.Late Late Srinivas Rao Deshmukh, R/o.H.No.1-5-91, Gouli Galli, Narayankhed Village and Mandal, Medak District (now Sangareddy district) 2. Rahul, S/o.late Srinivas Rao Deshmukh, Age:39 years, Occ: Service, C/o.late Srinivas Rao, Deshmukh, R/o,H.No,1-5-91, Gouli Galli, Narayankhed village and Mandal, Medak District. (now Sangareddy district) AND Smt Vijaya, Wo.Digamber Rao Patil, Age:66 years, Occ: housewife R/o.Presently residing at H.No.5-1-969/1, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. ...Appellants (Defendants) ...Respondent (Plaintiff) Appeal under Section 96 of CPC aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 30-06-20'17 in O.S.No.46 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Medak at Sanga Reddy. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the preliminary decree dated 30-06-2017 on the file of ll Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Medak at Sangareddy. l.A.No.2 of 2025 petition of CPC pr2ying that the High Court may be pleased to pass a decree in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise filed therewith as between the petitioners/appellants and respondents/respondents in the said l.A.No.2 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. The appeal and l.A coming this day for orders as to setflement in the presence Sri Meherchand Nori, Advocate for the appellant and of Sri S.R. Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent, Appellant and-respondent through their respective advocates having filed in l.A.No.2 of 2025 of requesting the court to pass a decree in terms the memorandum of compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds appeal, judgment and decree of the Lower court and the memo of compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and their Advocates and filed with said l.A.No.2 of 2025 and it appearing from the said memorandum of compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter out of court in terms memorandum of compromise filed herein. This Court Doth Record the terms of the said memorandum of compromise in original whereof is filed in the said l.A.No.2 ot 2025 of and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and DorH in terms of the said memorandum of compromise declare ORDER and DECREE in l.A.No.2 of 2025 as fottows:

1. That the Appeal be and hereby is allowed and suit i.e., O.S.No.46 of 201 .l and hereby is decreed in terms of the compromise entered between the parties;

2. That the respondent Smt. Vijaya agreed to relinquish all her rights in the suit schedule property granted in the preliminary decree dated 30-06-2017 in O.S.No.46 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Medak at Sangareddy, on receipt of the benefits by taking the monetarily benefits from Rahul Deshmukh, 2nd appellant. She also agreed to set aside the preliminary decree and pass a fresh decree in terms of the compromise;

3. That the compromise has been agreed with Rahuk Deshmukh to make a payment of Rs.20 Lakhs_ Dates and timelines of payment as follows:

4. That the Rs.2 Lakhs on 31"tMay 202s vide postdated cheque no.000067 of account number 0523161002279 of HDFC Bank;

5. That the Rs.6 Lakhs on 31"t Decembe r 2025 vide postdated cheque no.000068 ofaccount number 0523161002279 of HDFC Bank:

6. That the Rs.6 Lakhs on 3l"tDecember 2026 vide postdated.cheque no.000069 ofaccount number 0523161002279 of HDFC Bank; and

7. That the Rs.6 Lakhs on 31"t December 2O2l vide postdated cheque no.000070 of account number 0523161002279 of HDFC Bank. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR seetofurrrcec To,

1. The Il Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) MedakatSanga Reddy 2. fwo CD Copies KamPSL HIGH COURT DATED:01 10412025 COMPROMISE DECREE l.A.No.2 o12025 IN/AND AS.No.539 of 2018 THE APPEAL SUIT AND l.A.No.2 ot 2025 ARE ALLOWED e {