2 Vallapu Mahalaxmi v. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.30/11 of Kulsumpura P.S., Ghoshamahal Division, Hyderabad. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B.Vijaysen Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following. //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
The XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
The Station House Officer, Kulsumpura P.S., Hyderabad.
Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
One CC to Sri B.Vijaysen Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare Copy Ab AB DRAFTED ON 11-4-2011 HIGH COURT GKMRJ DATE: 11-4-2011
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.