State or reransana One CC to Mr. Mohammad Saleem, Advocate tOpUCj One CC to v. Ran tana Sarma'

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in C.C.No. 240 of 2019 on the file of the 1 st Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-1st Additional Judicial Fir.st Class lvlagistrate. Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri-Medchal District. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including dispense the presence of the petitioners in C.C.No. 240 of 2019 on the file of the 1st Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-1st Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Malkajigiri, Malkaligiri- Medchal District. l l.A. NO:3 OF 2025 Between: Shaik Yasmeen. Wo. Shaik Rasool Basha, Aged Housewife, rlo 29-1031 , Vinayak Nagar, Neredmet, Medchal District, Telengana State - 500 056. about 28 years, Occ. Hyderabad, Malkajigiri- ... Petitioners/Respondent No. 3/Defacto-Complainant AND

1. Smt. Shaheda 8egum, w/o.Silar, Age. 75 years, Occ. Housewife, 2. Sk. Silar, S/o. lmamam Sahib, Aged about 82 years, Occ. Retd. Employee. (all presently r/o Flat No.4, Sii Krishna Reiidency, Kiwis High Sctiool, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasham District, Andhra pra-desh).

3. The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. . . . RespondenURespondent - . . Petitioners/Accused No. 2 & 3

4. The Station House Officer, Neredmet P.S., Malkajigiri-Medchal Disfiict, Hyderabad - 500 056, Telengana State. ...-RespondenUCorirpliinant Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner No.1 and 2 /Accused to compromise the matter in c.c.No. 240 of 2019 on the file of the c.c.No.240 of 2e19 on the file of the learned '1st Addi.Junior civil Judge-cum-1st Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri-lt4edchaI District. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) r/w Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to Record the Compromise to proceedings against the Petitioners 1 and 2l Accused 1 and 2 herein in c.c.No.240 of 20'lg on the file of the learned 1st Addl.Junior civil Judge-cum- 1st Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajigiri, Ivtalkajigiri-Medchat District in view of the compiomise entered into between the parties. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. D.V. Ramana Sarma, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Mr. Mohammad Saleem, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 and Ms. s. Madhavi Assistant public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1. The Court made the following: ORDER j .,.,=ry TIIE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTI CE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI I.A.Nos.3 ard.4 of 2025 ln and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9O6 of 2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 'BNSS) by the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.24O of 2Ol9 on the hle of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additiona-l Judicial First Ciass Magistrate, Malkajgiri, Malkajgiri-Medchal District. The offences alleged against petitioners are under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act (for short DP Act')'

2. Heard Mr. Dantu Venkata Ramana Sarma, learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Mohammad Saleem. learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Ms. S. Madhavi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State' Perused the material on record'

3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for petitioners and respondent No.3, that during pendency of the I 2 JAK. J CRLP 906 2025 present Criminal Petition, parties have compromised the matter, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 h.ave been filed to record and permit them to compromise the matter to compound the offences. I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 xe ordered.

4. A Joint Memo is annexed along with I.A.No.4 of 2O2S in this criminal petition. When the matter was heard, it was representerl by learned counsel for petitioners/ accused Nos.2 and 3 that accused No.l, their son passed away. Both accused Nos.2 and 3 are senior citizens and are residents of Ongole and they cannot be physically present for identification. This Court directeci the High Court Legal Services Committee to a_rrange lor their appearance through virtual mocle (video conference).

5. A report has been filed by High Court Legal Services Committee that accused Nos.2 and 3 have appeared through virtual mode (video conference) from counsels Mobile No.9666630230 to Mobile No.98667 13734. Their Aadhar cards were verified and identified. It is further stated in the report that both parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into the compromise. Compromise deed 3 JAK, J cRI-P 906 2025 dated 23.01.2O25 is placed on the file of this Court. It is observed that both parties have signed the terms of compromlse

6. In view of the Joint Memo filed (annexed along with I.A.No.4 ol 20241, the compromise deed (on a non-judicial stamp paper) and the report of the High Court Legal Services Committee, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders need to be passed in this matter. 7 . Needless to state that in view of the compromise, this criminal petition stands allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 in C.C.No.24O of 2Ol9 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Malkajgiri, Malkajgiri- Medchal District are liable to be qudshed and hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha-ll stand closed. To, Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR AS //TRUE COPY// SECTION O FFICER 1 The lr Additionar Junior civir Judge cum XrX Additionat Metropolitan Maoistrate Cyberabad at Malkaiqiri ifH ;til" lj; J.L*otti""' nii'l'o;'" P ol ice Station' Kushaisuda D ivision The Secretary. High courtLeA';;;;Committee' Hish court Buildinss' 2 3 Hyderabad I Iff"r:ffrliiJiric Prosecutor, Hish court ror the State or reransana One CC to Mr. Mohammad Saleem, Advocate tOpUCj One CC to M/s D V. Ran tana Sarma' Advocate toPUCl two cD copies 4

6. 7. DL/gh \ / I I) I HIGH COURT DATED:1Ol02l2o2s ORDER LA. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2028 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETIT|ON NO: 906 OF 202s '!aJ' L STAI€ ( f o 21 ilr$ ?[25 I t DESnaa ",('c ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION // /l ifi/' Z l:t-' . I I t I I I