M.A. Qayoom v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by grarting liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.T.JAYASREE REGISTRAR AS //TRUE COPY// SECTIO N OFFICER To,
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 1731 OF 2025 Between: M.A. Qayoom, S/o. M.A. BaseerShaik, aged about 62 years, Occ. Retd Gvt Servent and agriculture R/o. H. No. 1-7-12, T .D. Gutta, Mahabubnagar Town and District. ...PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
#2. The Joint Collector, JogulambaGadwal District, JogulambaGadwal 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal Division, Gadwal. JogulambaGadwal District.
#4. The Thasildar, Gadwal Mandal, JogulambaGadwal District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mardamus declaring the action of the respoMents No.2 to 4 herein in not implementing the proceedings No. D1l1931l2OOS dated 24.03.2@5 issued by the 2hd respondent herein revoking the mutation proceedirlgs issued by the 4th respondent herein by maintaining status quo Ante inspite of the representations dated 21.06.2021, 1 1.O4.2O22, 3O.O9.2O23 and 22.06.2O24 submitted by the petitioner herein respect of the land in Sy. No. 63/Ka, admeasuring Ac.1{3 guntas, Sy. No.64, admeasuring Ac. 1{0 guntas and Sy. No.65, admeasuring Ac.1-18 guntas total admeasuring Ac.3-21 guntas situated at Ananthapur Village, Gadwal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, based upon his registered sale deed vide document No. 1303/191)1 , dated 2241-1991 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violation of the principles of natural justice and aontrary to law and consequently direct the respondents herein to implement of the name of the petitioner as pattadar in the ROR in respect of the agriculture land Sy. No.63/Ka, admeasuring Ac.1-03 guntas, Sy. No. 64, admeasuring Ac. 1{0 guntas and Sy. No.65, admeasuring Ac. 1-18 guntas total admeasuring Ac.3'21 guntas situated at Ananthaur village, GadwalMandal, Jogulamba Gadwal Distry, based upon registered sale deed vide document No. 1303/1991 , dated 22-O7 -199'l by duly implemerrting the order of the Joint Collector in file No. Dl/1931/2005, dated 05-11-201-as implemented in the name of another revision petitioner by name Sakeena Bee in respect of. her land lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition un'Jer Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to implement of the name of the petitioner as paftadar in the ROR in respect of the agriculture land Sy. No. 63/Ka, admeasuring Ac.1-03 guntas, Sy. No. 64, admeasuring Ac. 1-00 guntas and Sy. No. 65, admeasuring Ac. 1-18 guntas total adm,:asuring Ac.3-21 guntas situated at Ananthaur village, Gadwal Mandal, Jogularr, ba Gadwal District, based upon registered sale deed vide document No. 1303/'1991 , daled 2241-1991 by duly implementing the order of the Joint Collector in file No. D11193112005, dated 05-11-2005 as imptemented in the name of another revision petitioner by name Sakeena Bee in respect of her land, pending disposal of main Writ Petition Counsel for the F'etitioner: SRI. KOPPULA GOPAL Counsel forthe Ftespondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BIIASKAR R.EDDY WRIT PETITION lto. L73L of 2O25 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies as available under law.
#2. Permission as sought for is accorded.
#3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by grarting liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.T.JAYASREE REGISTRAR AS //TRUE COPY// SECTIO N OFFICER To,
#1. One CC to SRl. KOPPULA GOPAL Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE 'High Court for the State of Telangana'
#3. Two CD CoPies KKS BS G /; UJ' '/o .o i,\\o \1 oR 1HE s14 03 ytAp ZW a c^ P6a6;1ri.O .l Q^ ($ C' 41.:, HIGH COUIRT DATED:22lO1l2O2S ORDER WP.No.1731 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUT C:OSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.