QVed Akramu]la Hussaini v. The State of Te_langana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petitic,r is disposed of granting libertl to the petitioner to submit hi s representation online in the prescribed manner and upon suctr r ubmission, the…
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the. circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent no.2 in not considering the Petitioners representation daled 31.12.2025, seeking inclusion of eligible athletes and officials affiliated to the Kickboxing Association of relangana for participation in the 2nd Edition of the Hon'ble Chief Ministers Cup 2025-26, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of ,the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the Reslondent no.2 to Consider Petitioners representation dated 31 .12.2025 and permit the eligible athletes affiliated to the petitioner Association to participate in all eligible Kickboxing events under the 2nd Edition of the Hon, ble Chief Minister's Cup 2025-26, including appropriate age groups, weight categories and both boys and girls categories. / lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c t )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m a , be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to Consider Petitioners representation ( permit the eligible athletes affiliated to the Petitioner Assor;i aled 31 .12.2025 and rtion to pa(icipate in all eligible Kickboxing events under the 2nd Edition of the ll, n'ble Chief lvlinisters Cup 2025-26, including appropriate age groups, weight cat: and girls categories pending disposal of the above writ petitir ;ories and both boys t. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HASSAN HUSSAIN JUNAII) Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR SPORTS Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SC FOR SATG The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPANA WRIT PETITION No.2O23 of 2026
27.OL.2026 Between: Syed Akramulla Hussaini AND 'lhe Stale of Telangana, Represented by irs Principal Secretary. Youth Advancement, Tourism & Culture Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ano Lher . .. Petitioner ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri Hassan Hussain Junaidi, learned counsel for the t \ petitioner and learned Government pleader for Sports, appearing for respondent No.1 and iearned Standing Counsel for the Sports Authority of. Telangana State, appearing for respondent No.2. Perused the record.
#2. The present writ petition is iiled complaining inaclion of the respondents in not considering the petitioner,s representation, dated 31.12.2025 and seeking appropriate directions, as reflected in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 2
#3. During the course of hearing, the learned :ounsel for the respondents on instructions submitted, that t:: petitioner 1S required to submit his representation through th: online portal, and upon such submission, the same shall be considered in accordalce with 1aw
#4. In view of the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petitic,r is disposed of granting libertl to the petitioner to submit hi s representation online in the prescribed manner and upon suctr r ubmission, the respondents are directed to consider and disposc of the same as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with lar,r,' Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in t.-r s Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE coPY/{ ) ot' SDi. C.DEEPIKA lSTANTBEGISTRAR ,a. SECTI-ON OFFICER To i i ;*"s*ffitl+stsrm*;ul
#6. Two CD CoPies P o nd Culture r - 500022. ority of Telangana )l . toPUCl bf Telangana' at HIGH COURT DATED:2710112026 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.2023 of 2026 I r-( d il- \ E F i---., ' \\ l-. _ ^\-.\' +rs: 1 ,t ,F. \i I i .f l,.l x -,-' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.