The High Court · 2025

DMR Educational Society, bearing regd. No. 672t2O1O, office at Ranjole village, Zaheerabad ,.Mandal, Singareddy District, represented by, its , Secretary and Conespondent Sri Ankush Godke, S/o. Chandrakanth Godke,._aged about 3f,Yeqq, Rl/o.'' H.No.4-80, Bashveshwar Colony, Allipur village' Zah*tabad Mandal, Sangareddy District. - ,, : ND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue

2. TI:r- Assistant Director, Lands and Survey, Sangareddy District, at Sangareddy.

3.TheThasildar,ZaheerabadMandal,SangareddyDistrict. 4. The Deputy lnspector, Survey and Land Records, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.

5. Kotha Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o.Nagi Reddy, aged 40 years, Occ : Agriculture.

6. Kotha Nagi Reddy, S/o.Narsa Reddy, aged 66 years, Occ : Agriculture. 7. Kotha Jaipal Reddy, S/o.Narsa Reddy, aged 36 years, Occ : Agriculture. All are R/o.Ranjole Village, Zaheerabad Mandal, Sangareddy District. RespoMents No.5 to 7 are impleaded as per Court Order dated 28A-2O25 in l.A.No.1 of 2022 r" = RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wr:t of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not conducting the survey to fix the boundaries to the land of the petitioner society in Sy. No. 307 and 3O8, admeasuring Ac.4-25 guntas at Ranjole Village, Zaheerabad Mandal, Sangreddy Oistrict as proposed in file No. A3/915/2019 even after issuing notices for conducting the above survey and to fix the boundaries to the petitioner society so as to enabler the petitioner society to construct the compound wall to its educational institution, as illegal, unlawful, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to expedite the survey as proposed in file No. A3/915/2019 to fix the boundary of the land of the petitioner society so as to enable to construct the compound wall to its educational institution. I.A.NO:l OF 2020 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to complete the survey and fix the boundaries to the land of the petitioner sochty in Sy. No. 307 and 308, admeasuring Ac. 4-25 guntas at Ranjole village, Zaheerabad Mandal, Sangareddy District, expeditiously as proposed in file No. A3/915/2019, so as to enable the petitioner society to construct the compound wall to its educational institution, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitionerc : SRI M.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the lmplead Respondent Nos.5 to 7 : SRI S.KESHAVA RAO The Court made the following ORDER A (a TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JIISTICE E.V a U'RIT PEIITION 0.1525 0F 2o/2o/ raT:5[m! l-a-r----r-r{ This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constihrtion of India, is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue an order or direction more partianlarly one in tle natute of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of tle ath rcspondent in not conductirry the suruey to fu the boundaries to tle tand of the petitioner society in Sy./Yos-3O7 and 3O8 adm.ea,s-4rirq Ac.4.25 guntas at Ranjole Village, klrceraba.d Monda\ Sangreddy Dbt'ict @s proposed in fi\e No.A3/915/2019 euen afier issuing notices for anduding tle oboue atnteg and" to ftx the bound.aies to the petitiotter societg so 6ts to enable the petitioner society to crrnstruct tlg ampound. utall to ifs educational irlE;titrttion as illegal unlawfut antrary to law and consequentlg dired tle rgsltond,ents to expedite the surueA as proposed in- frL Ito.eS/gt5/2119 to ftx tle boundary of the lard of the petitioner societg so as to enable to construct tle ampound wallto its educational institution andpass-.. D

2. Heard sri M.Damodar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for tl:e petitioner and Sri S.Keshava Rao, learned counsel appearing for the Implead petitioners/proposed respondent Nos.S to 7 and. learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Covrt uide appearing \ \ i i I I I I I I I I I I I i I 1 order rlated O3.O2.2O2O in I.A.No. 1 of 2O2O has granted interim direction to conduct the survey and to fix the boundaries pertaining to ttre land to an extent of Acs.4.25 guntas in Sy.Nos.307 and. 308, situated at Ranjole village, Zaheerabad. Mandal, Sangareddy District. On such directions, respond.ent No.4 conducted the survey in the presence of the adjacent pattadars, independent witnesses and also in the presenc,-- of respondent Nos.S to 7( who were impleaded as per tlre orders of this Court on 28.08.2025l,. Accordingly, survey has been conducted and report has already been furnished. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the ollicial respondents in the presence of unofficial respondr:nts, as such, cause in the present writ petition does not sun"ive for furttrer consideration. Hence, he seeks to dispose of the present Writ petition.

4. learned counsel appearing for the implead petitione::s/proposed respondent Nos.S to 7 would submit that the respondent Nos.S to 7 are the adjacent owners of the subject property, as such, they are necessary parties to the present writ petition. He submits that at the time of \ !l ::3:: conducting survey by the 4th respondent, the respondents 5 to 7 }rave submitted their objections, however, the same were not considered by tlle 4th respondent, and concluded the survey and submitted report in that regard. He further submitted that civil proceedings are pending between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.S to 7 before the learned Junior civil Judge, Zaheerabad. 6- , karned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue, for tJre respondents would submit that the relief sought for in t]:e present has been complied by the 4th respondent, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition and sought for closure of the writ petition. q. Having heard the submissions made by all the learned counsel, tl:is court is of the opinion that the interim order dated O3.O2.2O2O in I.A.No.1 of 2O2O has already been complied with by conducting survey and fixing of boundaries in the presence of all concerned parties i.e., petitioner and unoflicial respondent Nos.S to 7. Therefore, the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for further consideration. However, since it is stated by the learned counsel for the i2422 responrlent Nos.S to 7 that civil disputes are pending between the pe'Eitioner and the unoflicial respondents, they are at liberty 1o agitate their rights before tJ:e civil Court concerned.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shatl be no ord.er as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, perlding in this writ petition shall stand elosed. To

1. lhe F'rincipal Secretary, Telang;tna at Hyderabad.- 2. The A,ssistant Director, Sangareddy. /TRUE COPY'/ Sd/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT N OFFICER riat, State of Revenue, t-ands :and ,Suryey, Sangareddy District at District. Hyderatrad.IOUTI 1

3. The Th;rsildar, Zaheerabad Mandal; 4. The Deputy lnspector, Survey'and- 5. Two cc;s to GP for REVENUE, High court for the State of relangana at 6. One CC to SRt M.DAMODAR REDDY, Advocate tOptrcl 7. One CC to SRt S.KESHAVA RAO, Advocate (OPUC) 8. Two CD Copies Sangareddy District. Land Records, Sangareddy, Sangareddy SA/MP W 4 / I I I HIGH COURT DATED t2810812025 I I I I I I i I i l ORDER WP.No.1525 of 2020 Tl-iE s Iil, ( l! 1\ * rr8 5 2{]26 * DISPOSING OF THE W.P UT a "* \