The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, decldring the action of the respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.3 herein in threatening to demolish petitioner's residential premises bearing Municipal No.8-14-53/15/3 (PTIN - 1115505943),admeasuring 100 Sq. Yards or equivalent to 83.61 square meters, having plinth area of 100 square feet (A'C'C), situated at Meer Sagar, Mailardevpally Village, under GHMC Rajendranagar Circle, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana without following due process of law, despite currency of notice period in notice bearing No. 106 / COMM / HYDRAA t 2025 dated 17 .0'l .2025 granting (3) days of time to fumish documents in respect of the residential property, without inspecting petitioner's title and other documents, without putting petitioner on notice as highly illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Art.300(4) of the Constitution of lndia, in clear violation of petitioner's legal and fundamental rights, against the principles of natural justice, in consequence direct the respondents herein more particularly respondent No.3 not to demolish petitioner's residential premises bearing Municipal No.8-14-5:l/15/3 (PTIN - 1115505943), admeasuring 100 Sq. Yards or equivalent to 83.6'l.square meters, having plinth area of 100 square feet (A.C.C), situated at Meer Sagar, Mailardevpally Village, under G HMC Rajendranagar Circle, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC prqying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to furnish documents pursuant to impugned notice dated 17.O1 .2025 by enlarging time. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ZABI UR RAHMAN KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.2&3, ,,STHNDER REDDY, BEt ffi The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICT K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.1496 of2O25 ORDER: Heard Sri Zabi UR Rahman Khan, learned counsel for ttre petitioner and Sri K. Ravinder Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos'2 and 3' Perused the record.

2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is"absolute owner and possessor of residential house bearing Municipal No'8- 14-53115/3, admeasuring 100 square yards situated at Mailardevpally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. He is in possession of the said property' While the matter stood thus, 3'd respondent has issued notice dated 17 .O1.2O25 requesting the petitioner to furnish copies of the following documents: i. Copy of Sanctioned Plan & its Proceed'ings from the concerned authoritY, if anY' ii. Copy of Registered Documents of Property' iii. CoPY of Link Documents iv. CoPY of LaYout Plan v. Details of Court cases (if anY)'

3. Three days time was granted to the petitioner' It is the specific contention of the petitioner that 3'd.respondent I(L,J w.P Nc. r496 of 2025 )) r1 2 1 i instead of serving the said notice to the petitioner, affixed it on the subject property. Only three days time was granted to the pet.itioner to furnish copies of the aforesaid documents. Without waiting for the said three days time, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are trying to demolish the construction. Therefore, according to the petitioner the said action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 is arbitrary and illegal.

4. Where,as, Sri K. Ravinder Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 on instructions would submit that petitioner has to submit copies of the said documents and 3.d respondent will consider the same ald thereafter he will take action, if any.

5. In the light of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed of granting (10) days time from today to the petitioner to submit copies of the aforesaid documents as sought by the 3.d respondent, vide notice dated

17.07.2025 and on receipt of the same, 3rd respondent shall consider the same ald pass an appropriate order strictly in acr:ordance with law by putting the petitioner on 1 KL,J w.P.No.1496 ot2O25 J notice and affording an opportunity of hearing. Thereafter respondent Nos.2 and 3 are at liberty to take action, if any, against the petitioner herein. They sha1l complete the said exercise within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the aforesaid documents from the petitioner herein. Till then, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. If the petitioner fail to submit copies of the .said documents within 1O days from today, liberty is granted to Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take action against the petitioner herein. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed /ffRUE COPY// SD/. T. VIJAY KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^Ju SECTION OFFICER To, . The Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban o.iir"riiEii, stii"-"t't"i"[si;i, SeCretarlat Buildinos Hvderabad rhe commissioner, nvoeil'uXt' 6b;;ie;'-iig;p"nie f .'io Adsets Monitoring jni ffi 6"ii;;-A;;hCi IWDRAA), Bud na Bfi avan' Hvd erabad . The lnspector of Police, H#;fiXa6Gas:t;;R;;po"d" and Asset Protection 1 2 3 4 5 Agn:t'i ['3R1'XB' uR RAHMAN KHAN, Advocate toPUC] . Two CCs to cp FoR MCpIXiiilN uFiBAr.i DLV, fugh courtfor the state of u. 6"J3'83i;toSH]l*r,* RAVTNDER REDDY,.sc FoR GHMo/HYDRAA' ropucl (sri Katika nriinilih;-ddy,'dcior'HYDRAA shall inform this brder tb hesPondent No'3)

7. Two CD CoPies. BSK BN \ CC TODAY i t{ti S 14 r€ c o r{AJJ2 20fi :: t o,^ ./. HIGH COURT DATED:2010112025 ORDER WP.No.1496 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \O