High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No. 8196212017-LRUP, dt. '1 3.06.2018 issued by the 2nd Respondent in favour of the 3rd Respondent and informed the said proceedings to the Petitioner through Memo No. 8125012020-5, dl. 29.02.2020 and lVemo No. 8134212020, dt. 04.06.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and violative of Articles 14 and 3004 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the said proceedings No. 8/962/2017-LRUP, dt. 13.06.2018 and consequently to direct the 2nd Respondent to rectify the online revenue record by removing the name of the 3rd Respondent in Khata No. 386 for an extent of Ac.0.'1900 Gts. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circuntstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Couft may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to remove name of the 3rd Respondent from the dharani portal while |estoring name of the Petitioner for an extent of Ac.1.26Gts. and the name of Mr. Venkataiah for an extent of Ac.0.14Gts farling in Sy.no.'146 of Venkatraopet Villar;e, Konaraopet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District as reflected in the original record and the digital passbooks by receiving the additional documents filed herevrith. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Siection 151 CPC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma'/ be pleased to direct the 2nd Resportdent to rectify the online pahani in so far as the Sy. No. 1461A of Venkatrao Pet Village, Konarao Pet Mandal by removing the name of the 3rd Respondent in Khata No. 386 which was wrongly mentioned only on the basis of the proceedings Nc.81962/2017-LRUP, dt. 13.06.20'18 witho:t any basis or documents or notice Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.SURYA SATISH Counsel for the Respordents No.1&2 : SMT.S.SRAVANTHI, . ASST.GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.1764 of 2O2L ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed questioning the proceedings No.B196212017-LRUP dated 13.06.2018 issued by the respondent No.2 in favour of the respondent No.3 and informed the said proceedings to the petitioner through Memo No.Bl25Ol2020-05 dated 29.O2.2O2O and Memo No.Bl342l202O datcC 04.06.2020 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to set aside the said proceedings dated 13.06.2018 by directing the respondent No.2 to rectify the online rcvcnue rccord by removir-rg thc namc of the respondent No.3 in l(hata No.386 for the land admeasuring to arr extent of Ac.0.190O gts. 2 Heard Sri T. Surya Satish, learned Counsel lor the petitioner and Smt S. Sravanthi, the learned Assistant Government for Pleader lor Rcvenue for the respondent Nos.l and 2. 2 -I SI(, II V/.P.No. l76rt of 202 I 2 Tht: personal notice sent to the respondent No.3 \\'as returncd with endorsement as 'Refusctl'and thcrefore. it amounts t.o deemed service of notice on the respondent No.3.

4. Lt:arned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in slritc of lapse of more than 3Y2 years, the official rcspondents did not choose to file counter and in spite of scrvice notic e, the respondent No.3 has refus,:d to receive the noticc'. He submits that after filing this rvrit petition, thc petitior-rcr made application through onlLne Dharani Portal for cor rection of cntries in the revenue re,lords and in spite of that the respondents did not take any steps for correction r '1' entries and requested trt direct the rt-'spondents to correct the entries in the revenue rccords an<l pass a pp ropriate orders. 5 Leirrr;ed Assistant Government Pleadt:r 1br Revenue submits that R()R Act was amended in the y<:ar,2025 and 3 SK, .J W.P.No.1764 of 202 1 now Dharani Portal was stopped by the revenue authorities and the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 came into force and if the petitioner makes fresh application as per the existing rules, the respondents will consider the same as per law and requested to pass l I appropriate order.

6. In view of the submissions of both sides, without going into the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh application to the respondents through online as per the existing Rules and on receipt of such application, the respondents are directed to consider the said application and pass appropriate orders as per law after issuing notice to the eflected parties including the respondent No.3 within 8 r'vecks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 - SK,J' W. P. No. I 764 of 20) I

7. Mis,:ellaneous applications pending, il. any, in this Writ Petitirtn, shall stand closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY' SD/.MOHD.ISMAIL OEPTJTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Secretariat at H tderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, h.onarao Pet Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla District -- SURYA SATISH, Advocate. IOPUCI 3. One CC to SRI 4. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION, High Court for the State of Telangana. [C UT]

5. Two CD Copies BSK LS HIGH COUR'T DATED:081101',r-025 I .j i4 (,\ 2 5 0il 2025 -) ORDER WP.No.1764 ot 2021 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSI'S @ I lv- o I