V.Srinivas v. The Authorized Officer
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SRI MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETI TION NO: 1604 OF 2026 Between: V.Srinivas, S/o. Yakaiah, Aged Major' Occ. Business, R/o' H No'10-3-71' Burhanpuram, Khammam, Khammam District. ...PETITIONER
AND 1 2 The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of lndia' Assets Recovery Branch, 249l3RT, 1stfloor, Main Road, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad. The Union Bank of lndia, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Khammam Wyra Road Branch, Khammam. ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that, a) the Respondents shall consider the letter of the petitioner dated 03/01/2025 for his request for one (1) time settlement towards his loan account No.365101980050000 in Union Bank of lndia situated in Khammam Branch, Khammam for clearing the loan amount payable by the petitioner. b) further declare that, the Respondents shall not take any coercive steps for sale of property of house of the petitioner viz., House bearing No 1-5-64/ 2(01d) or 10-3- 71(New) situated at Burhanpuram Area, Khammam Town' lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci,r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court me1 be pleased to direct the respondent to finalize the OTS amount payable by the Jx titioner towards one time settlement for the loan obtained by the petitione r vide Account No. 365101980050000 in Union Bank of lndia situated in Khammam Branch, Khammam, in pursuance of letter addressed by him datecl 0310112026 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJ J Counsel for the Respondents: SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT The Court made the following: ORDER I t \ \ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JIJSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16O4 OF 2o26 DATE:20.01.2o.26 Between: V.Srinivas And l.The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, Assets Recovery Branch, 249/3RT, l"t Floor, Main Road, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad and another. . . . Petitioner . Re spondents Mr.Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
ORDER:
(Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. W.P.No.1604 of 2026, atong with at. connected applications, is accordingly dismissed as with,l -awn. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/., \. SRINIVASA REDDY A!; ;ISTANT REGISTRAR { //TRUE COPYII '_7 SECTION OFFICER To,
One CC to SRl. SR|N|VASA RAO MAD|RAJU, Advo,: rte [OpUC]
One CC to STANDTNG COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL G() /T, [OPUC]
Two CD Copies DAN BS di- I HIGH COURT DATED:2010112026 ORDER WP.No.1604 of 2026 \ o() 1iltr,1 - r_ \- '^-1. i Ltrr .r 2 B [,i ?r\/i j:. (.? :. 1., - : .>_i .': 'r' -)- '/ /'t',./ '. r''.(:: '-:. - 'rru' '' -k Dn.sl--/i, DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ( '$),t
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.